 Act, as often stated by this court, is that " whenever a court of law is competent to take cognizance of a right, and has power to proceed to a judgment which affords a plain, adequate and complete remedy, without the aid of a court of equity, the plaintiff...  Lawyers' Reports Annotated - Halaman 2331903Tampilan utuh - Tentang buku ini
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1884 - 732 halaman
...preventing an injustice irremediable at law." And the courtdeclared, as a result of the argument, "that whenever a court of law is competent to take cognizance...defendant has^ a constitutional right to a trial by a jury." See, also, Parker v. Cotton Co. 2 Black, 545; Grand Chute v. Winegar, 15 Wall. 373; Lewte... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1884 - 828 halaman
...preventing an injustice irremediable. at law." And the court declared as a result of the argument, " that whenever a court of law is competent to take cognizance...defendant has a constitutional right to a trial by a jury." See also Parker v. Winnepiseogee Lake Cotton and Woolen ManuSyllabus. facturing Company, 2... | |
 | Lawrence Lewis, Adelbert Hamilton, John Houston Merrill, William Mark McKinney, James Manford Kerr, John Crawford Thomson - 1884 - 740 halaman
...Justice Hunt, in this case, uses language, as follows: "And the result of the argument is, that wherever a Court of Law is competent to take cognizance of...defendant has a constitutional right to a trial by jury. The right to a trial by jury is a great constitutional right, and it is only in exceptional cases,... | |
 | Charles Patrick Daly - 1885 - 610 halaman
...Justice HUNT in this case uses language as follows : "And the result of the argument is, that wherever a court of law is competent to take cognizance of...defendant has a constitutional right to a trial by jury. The right to a trial by jury is a great constitutional right, and it is only in exceptional cases and... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1887 - 786 halaman
....21, 98. The effect of the provision of the Judiciary Act, as often stated by this court, is that " whenever a court of law is competent to take cognizance...defendant has a constitutional right to a trial by jury." Hipp v. Babin, 19 How. 271, 278; Insurance Co. v. Bailey, 13 Wall. 616, 621; Grand Chute v. Winegar,... | |
 | 1887 - 1458 halaman
...St. 21,98. The effect of the provision of the judiciary act, as often stated by this court, is that "whenever a court of law is competent to take cognizance...defendant has a constitutional right to a trial by jury." Hipp v. Babin, 19 How. 271, 278; Insurance Co. v. Bailey, 13 Wall. 616, 621; Grand Chute v. Wtnegar,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1887 - 1244 halaman
...L. 21, 93. The effect of the provision of the Judiciary Act, as often stated by this court, is that "Whenever a court of law is competent to take cognizance...defendant has a constitutional right to a trial by jury." Hipp v. Babin, 19 How. 271, 278 [60 U. 8. bk. 15, L. ed. 633, 685]; Ins. Co. v. Bailey, 13 Wall. 616,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1889 - 684 halaman
...suggested by the counsel in their arguments." He then adds: "And the result of the argument is, that whenever a court of law is competent to take cognizance of a right and has power to 10-. US 212. 592 ROOT v. RAILWAY COMPANY. [Sup. Ct. Opinion of the court, complexity of the .account... | |
 | William Blackstone - 1890 - 640 halaman
...Stat. 21, 98.) The effect of the provision of the judiciary act, as often stated by the courts, is that "whenever a court of law is competent to take cognizance...defendant has a constitutional right to a trial by jury." (Hipp v. Babin, 19 How. 271,278 ; Insurance Co. v. Bailey, 13 Wall. 616, 621; Grand Chute v. Winegar,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1891 - 800 halaman
...110 US 568, 573 ; Buzard v. Houston, 119 US 347, 351. And so it has been held by this court " that whenever a court of law is competent to take cognizance...defendant has a constitutional right to a trial by jury." Hipp v. £abm, 19 How. 271, 278. It would be difficult, and perhaps impossible, to state any general... | |
| |
