...Estate Loan Co. v. Molesworth. 3 Man. 116. "Whenever a court of law is competent to take cogniznnce of a right, and has power to proceed to a Judgment...defendant has a constitutional right to a trial by Jury." Hipp v Babin, 19 How. (US) 271, 278. 15 L. ed. 633 [ouot Watson v. Huntington, 215 Fed. 472, 131 CCA...

...law.' . . . The effect of the provision of the Judiciary Act, as often stated by this court, is that 'Whenever a court of law is competent to take cognizance...plaintiff must proceed at law, because the defendant has n constitutional right to a trial by jury.' In a very recent ease the court said : 'This enactment...

...rccision of the same is essential to protect the opposite party from pecuniary injury." Held, also, that whenever a court of law "is competent to take cognizance...without the aid of a court of equity, the plaintiff must in general proceed in law, because the defendant, under such circumstances, has a right to a trial...

...of law, competent to take cognizance of a right, has power to proceed to a judgment which af fords a plain, adequate, and complete remedy, without the aid of a court of equity, the plaintiff must, in general, proceed at law, because the defendant under such circumstances has a right to trial by...

...numerous other authorities, the matter is thus summed up: " And the result of the argument is that whenever a court of law is competent to take cognizance...defendant has a constitutional right to a trial by jury." The right to a trial by jury is a great constitutional right, and it is only in exceptional cases and...

...preventing an injustice irremediable at law. " And the court declared as a result of the argument. "That, whenever a court of law is competent to take cognizance...defendant has a constitutional right to a trial by a jury." Bee. also, Parker v. Cotton Co., 2 Black, 545 [07 US, XVII., 333; Grand Chuta v. Wincgar,...

...NY 524 ; Clark v. K. Co. 36 Mo. 202 ; Hynds v. n«ys, 25 Ind. 31 : Parker v. Jenkins, 3 Bush. OS7. court of law is competent to take cognizance of a...defendant has a constitutional right to a trial by jury." The right to a trial by jury is a great constitutional right, and it is only in exceptional cases and...

...»side as against the weight of evidence or contrary to lew or as without evidence to support It. Stuart court of law is competent to take cognizance of a right and lias power to proceed to a judgment which affords a plain, adequate and complete remedy, without the...

...may be had at law." This is the general rule in all courts, "and the result of the argument is that, whenever a court of law is competent to take cognizance...defendant has a constitutional right to a trial by jury." Hipp v. Babin, 60 US 271, 15 L. Ed. 633; Grand Chute v. Winegar, 92 US 373, 21 L. Ed. 174. In Parker...

...119 US 347, 351, 30 L. ed. 451, 452, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 249. And so it has been held by this court 'that whenever a court of law is competent to take cognizance...the defendant has a constitutional right to a trial byjury.' Hipp v. Babin, 19 How. 271, 278, 15 L. ed. 633, 635. "It would be difficult, and perhaps impossible,...