 ... for losses suffered by the latter in consequence of the ordinary risks of the business in which he is employed, nor in consequence of the negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business, unless...  Biennial Report - Halaman 367oleh California. Department of Industrial Relations. Division of Labor Statistics and Law Enforcement - 1908Tampilan utuh - Tentang buku ini
 | New York (State). Commissioners of the Code - 1862 - 538 halaman
...negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business,1 unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employee.1 1 Sherman v. Rochester and Syracuse RR, 17 NY, 156 ; Russell ». Hudson River RR, id., 136;... | |
 | 1868 - 894 halaman
...negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business, unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable, employee." The rule, as stated, was adhered to in Armstrong v. Catawissa Railroad, 13 Wright 186, but... | |
 | California - 1876 - 622 halaman
...negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business, unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employee. § 1971. An employer must in all cases indemnify his employee for losses caused by the former's... | |
 | Edward P. Weeks - 1879 - 368 halaman
...negligence of anofher person employed by the same employer in the same general business, unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employee. 1 To such cases the rule of respondeat superior does not apply, unless there has been want... | |
 | Thomas Beven - 1881 - 188 halaman
...negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business, (a) unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employe." (b) Article 1,007: "An employer must in all cases indemnify his employe' for losses caused by his own... | |
 | 1888 - 1450 halaman
...negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business, unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employe.'" And: "But, gentlemen, if you find from the evidence that the defendant company was guilty of negligence... | |
 | 1906 - 1148 halaman
...the same general business, unless tlio negligence causing the injury was committed in the performance of a duty the employer owes by law to the employe,...the employer has neglected to use ordinary care in tKe selection of the culpable employé, n master is not liable for injuries to a servant caused by... | |
 | F. I. Vassault - 1884 - 176 halaman
...causing the injury was caused in the performance of a duty the employer owes bj law to the employee, or unless the employer has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employee. The principal or employer shall, however, be responsible for injuries caused by the negligence... | |
 | 1917 - 1226 halaman
...and control his services," we think, cannot be maintained. Section 1970 of the Civil Code provides that: The "employer shall be liable for such injury when the same results from the wrongful net, neglect or default * * * of a person employed by such employer having... | |
| |
