 | United States. Supreme Court - 1896 - 768 halaman
...it could not make it. Such a contract cannot be ratified by either party, because it could not have been authorized by either. No performance on either...be the foundation of any right of action upon it." 139 US 59, 60. But we think the present case falls within the language of Lord Chancellor Selborne,... | |
 | 1900 - 944 halaman
...that it could not make it. The contract cannot be ratified by either party because it could not have been authorized by either. No performance on either...be the foundation of any right of action upon it." In Biink v. Hawkins, 34 US App. 423, 18 CCA 78, and 71 Fed. 369, we drew a distinction between acts... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1900 - 1050 halaman
...by either party, because it could not have been authorized by either. No performance on either aide can give the unlawful contract any validity, or be the foundation of any right of action upon It" The doctrine so generally maintained that an estoppel to set up the defense of ultra vires arises from... | |
 | Darius Harlan Pingrey - 1900 - 480 halaman
...that it could not make it. Such contract cannot be ratified by either party because it could not have been authorized by either. No performance on either side can give the said contract any validity or be the foundation of any right of action upon it. When a corporation... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1901 - 1548 halaman
...cannot be ratified by either party, no performance on either side can give the unlawful contract an; validity, or be the foundation of any right of action upon it. 12. When a contract made by a corporation is beyond the powers conferred upon it by existing laws,... | |
 | Henry Osborn Taylor - 1902 - 1002 halaman
...make it. The contract cannot be ratified by either party, because it could not have been authorized bv either. No performance on either side can give the...be the foundation of any right of action upon it." ' As already said, the Supreme Court has apparently extended 439 TJ. 8. 24, 48 sqq. See the I in California... | |
 | New York (State). Supreme Court. Appellate Division - 1903 - 778 halaman
...majority of the claimants, and the contract cannot be ratified by either party, because it could not have been authorized by either ;. no performance on either...the foundation of any right of action upon it. "When App. Div.J SECOND DEPAKTMBNT, DECEMBER TEKM, 1902. a corporation is acting within the general scope... | |
 | James Smith McMaster - 1903 - 1004 halaman
...that it could not make it. The contract cannot be ratified by either party, because it could not have been authorized by either. No performance on either...be the foundation of any right of action upon it." This language was also cited and expressly approved in Jacksonville, etc., Railway v. Hooper, 160 US... | |
 | Bruce Wyman - 1903 - 170 halaman
...that it could not make it. The contract cannot be ratified by either party, because it could not have been authorized by either. No performance on either...be the foundation of any right of action upon it." This language was also cited and expressly approved in Jacksonville &c. Railway v. Hooper, 160 US 514,... | |
| |
... conferred upon it by the legislature, is not voidable only, but wholly void, and of no legal effect. The objection to the contract is, not merely that the corporation ought not to have made it, but that it could not make it. The contract cannot be... 
