 | 1990 - 408 halaman
...account the effect of any consistent biases due to those types of errors. The chances are about 68 out of 1 00 that an estimate from the sample would differ from a complete census by less than the relative standard error. The chances are about 95 out of 100 that the difference is... | |
 | 1966 - 656 halaman
...variance, but does not measure any systematic biases in the data. The chances are about 68 out of 100 that an estimate from the sample would differ from a complete census figure by less than the standard error. The chances are about 95 out of 100 that the difference would be less than twice... | |
 | National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.) - 1993 - 344 halaman
...occur by chance because only a sample of the population is surveyed. The chances are about 68 in 100 that an estimate from the sample would differ from a complete census by less than the standard error. The chances are about 95 in 100 that the difference would be less... | |
 | 1995 - 520 halaman
...account the effect of any consistent biases due to those types of errors. The chances are about 68 out of 1 00 that an estimate from the sample would differ from a complete census by less than the relative standard error. The chances are about 95 out of 100 that the difference is... | |
 | Robin A. Cohen, J. F. Van Nostrand - 1996 - 337 halaman
...occur by chance because only a sample of the population is surveyed. The chances are about 68 in 100 that an estimate from the sample would differ from a complete census by less than the standard error. The chances are about 95 in 100 that the difference would be less... | |
 | United States. Department of Health and Human Services - 2000 - 998 halaman
...than the entire population. Assuming a normal distribution of events, the chances are about 68 in 100 that an estimate from the sample would differ from a complete census by less than the standard error. The chances are about 95 in 100 that the difference would be less... | |
 | 1974 - 680 halaman
...enumeration errors but does not measure systematic biases in the data. The chances are about 68 out of 100 that an estimate from the sample would differ from a complete census figure by less than the standard error. The chances are about 95 out of 100 that the difference would be less than twice... | |
 | 2006 halaman
...errors but does not measure any systematic biases in the data. The chances are about 68 out of 100 that an estimate from the sample would differ from a complete census figure by less than the standard error. The chances are about 95 out of 100 that the difference would be less than twice... | |
 | 1971 - 610 halaman
...errors but does not measure any systematic biases in the data. The chances are about 68 out of 100 that an estimate from the sample would differ from a complete census figure by less than the sampling error. The chances are about 95 out of 100 that the difference would be less than twice... | |
 | 1971 - 52 halaman
...errors but does not measure any systematic biases in the data. The chances are about 68 out of 100 that an estimate from the sample would differ from a complete census figure by less than the standard error. The chances are about 95 out of 100 that the difference would be less than twice... | |
| |
... by less than the standard error. The chances are about 95 out of 100 that the difference would be less than twice the standard error. The figures presented in the tables are approximations to the standard errors of various estimates shown in this... 
