 | 1974 - 160 halaman
...but it does not measure, as such, any systematic biases in the data. The chances are about 68 out of 1 00 that an estimate from the sample would differ from a complete census figure by less than the standard error. The chances are about 90 out of 100 that this difference would be less than 1.6... | |
 | 1973 - 40 halaman
...it does not measure, as such, any systematic biases in the data. The chances are about 68 out of 100 that an estimate from the sample would differ from a complete census figure by less than the standard error. The chances are about 90 out of 100 that this difference would be less than 1.6... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Education and Labor - 1971 - 258 halaman
...errors but does not measure any systematic biases in the data. The chances are about 68 out of 100 that an estimate from the sample would differ from a complete census figure by less than the standard error. The chances are about 95 out of 100 that the difference would be less than twice... | |
 | United States. Bureau of the Census - 1971 - 202 halaman
...because a sample rather than the whole of the population is surveyed. The chances are about 68 out of 100 that an estimate from the sample would differ from a complete census by less than the standard error. The chances are about 95 out of 100 that the difference would be less... | |
 | United States. Bureau of the Census - 1972 - 264 halaman
...because a sample rather than the whole of the population is surveyed. The chances are about 68 out 100 that an estimate from the sample would differ from a complete census by less than the standard error. The chances are about 95 out of 100 that the difference would be less... | |
 | Eugene E. Hixson, Edith Mary Huddleston - 1972 - 52 halaman
...because a sample rather than the whole of the population is surveyed. The chances are about 68 out of 100 that an estimate from the sample •would differ from a complete census figure by less than the standard error. The chances are about 95 out of 100 that the difference would be less than twice... | |
 | 1972 - 902 halaman
...occur by chance because only a sample of the population is surveyed. The chances are about 2 out of 3 that an estimate from the sample would differ from a complete census by less than the standard error. The chances are about 19 out of 20 that the difference would be less... | |
 | Charles S. Wilder - 1972 - 52 halaman
...not include estimates of any biases which might lie in the data. The chances are about 68 out of 100 that an estimate from the sample would differ from a complete census by less than the standard error. The chances are about 95 out of 100 that the difference would be less... | |
 | 1974 - 156 halaman
...errors but does not measure any systematic biases in the data. The chances are about 68 out of 100 that an estimate from the sample would differ from a complete census figure by less than the standard error. The chances are about 95 out of 100 that the difference would be less than twice... | |
| |
... by less than the standard error. The chances are about 95 out of 100 that the difference would be less than twice the standard error. The figures presented in the tables are approximations to the standard errors of various estimates shown in this... 
