 | 1924 - 520 halaman
...(26 US) 1, 7 L. Ed. 27, the United States Supreme Court stated : " 'Where an instrument is drawn and executed, which professes, or is intended to carry into execution an agreement, whether in writing or by parol, previously entered into, but which, by mistake of the draftsman, either... | |
 | William Mack, William Benjamin Hale - 1920 - 1290 halaman
...into execution an agreement, which is in writing or by parol, previously made between the parties, but which by mistake of the draftsman, either as to fact or law, does not fulfill or which violates the manifest intention of the parties to the agreement, equity will correct the mistake... | |
 | 1894 - 1212 halaman
...which professes, or is intended, to carry into execution an agreement, whether In writing or by parol. previously entered into, but which by mistake of the...draftsman, either as to fact or law, does not fulfill, or which violates, the manifest intention of the parties to the agreement, equity will correct the... | |
 | 1919 - 710 halaman
...attention in this case, in substance as follows: "The fact is that, where an instrument is drawn and executed, which professes or is intended to carry into execution an agreement, whether in writing or by parol, previously entered into, but which, by mistake of the draftsman, either... | |
 | 1924 - 1010 halaman
...(26 TJ. S.) 1, 7 L. Ed. 27, the United States Supreme Court stated: "Where an instrument is drawn and executed, which professes, or is intended, to carry into execution an agreement, whether in writing or by parol, previously entered into, but which, by mistake of the draftsman, either... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1902 - 710 halaman
...parties had agreed on, that would have formed a very different case, for if an instrument is drawn and executed which professes or is intended to carry into...by mistake of the draftsman, either as to fact or to lav,*, does not fulfill that intention, or violates it, equity will correct the mistake so as to... | |
 | 1924 - 1626 halaman
...Court of the United States in Hunt v. Rhodes, 1 Pet. 1, 7 L. ed. 27: 'When an instrument is drawn and executed, which professes, or is intended, to carry into execution an agreement, whether in writing or by parol, previously entered into, but which, by mistake of the draftsman, either... | |
 | Mississippi. Supreme Court - 1892 - 1142 halaman
...intended, to carry into execution an agreement, whether in writing or by parol previously entered into, and which, by mistake of the draftsman, either as to fact or law, does not fulfill the manifest intention of the parties, equity will correct the mistake. Hunt v. Rousmanier, 1 Peters,... | |
 | 1914 - 1226 halaman
...Story's Equity Jurisprudence, it is said: "Where an instrument is drawn and executed, which pi-ofesses or is intended to carry into execution an agreement...by mistake of the draftsman, either as to fact or to law, does not fulfill that intention, or violates it, equity will correct that mistake, so as to... | |
 | 1912 - 1250 halaman
...general principles, we hold to be incontrovertible. The first is that, where an instrument is drawn and executed which professes or Is intended to carry into execution an agreement, whether in writing or by parol, previously entered into, but which, by mistake of the draughtsman,... | |
| |
... or which violates the manifest intention of the parties to the agreement, equity will correct the mistake so as to produce a conformity of the instrument to the agreement. 
