 ... to establish a defence on the ground of insanity, it must be clearly proved that, at the time of the committing of the act, the party accused was laboring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality...  Albany Law Journal - Halaman 3261870Tampilan utuh - Tentang buku ini
 | Irvine Loudon - 1997 - 612 halaman
...from disease of the mind as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing; or, if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong'. To put it more simply, the rules fell between two stools, neither ruling out the possibility of the... | |
 | E. Attwooll - 1997 - 280 halaman
...from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing, or, if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong' - sometimes characterised as posing the question 'Would he still have done it if there had been a policeman... | |
 | John Pratt - 1997 - 228 halaman
...of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act or. if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong. (See M'Nughten '.i Cast; (1843) 10CI. & Fin. 200.) impulse and homicidal mania, for example, were by... | |
 | Christopher D. Webster, Margaret A. Jackson - 1997 - 488 halaman
...from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing; or, if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong. (Regitta v. M'Naghten, 1843, p. 203) There are three main substantive elements of the M'Naghten standard.... | |
 | Donald Grant Creighton - 1998 - 1200 halaman
...from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing; or, if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong". The question of insanity, the judges continued, must not be put in any general or abstract fashion, but... | |
 | Hermann Mannheim - 1965 - 462 halaman
...from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing, or, if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong. For a detailed analysis and criticism of these Rules the reader has to be referred to the literature... | |
 | Paul Elliott Rock - 1998 - 386 halaman
...from disease ot the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing, or. ii he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong.' '4 S 3 Criminal Law Act 1967. Self-defence requires that the defendant was personally threatened hy... | |
 | Jay M. Feinman - 2000 - 380 halaman
...became known as the M'Naghten rule: [T]o establish defense on the ground of insanity, it must clearly be proved that, at the time of committing the act, the...that he did not know he was doing what was wrong. The M'Naghten rule was widely adopted and is in effect in one form or another in about half of the American... | |
 | J. E. R. Staddon - 2001 - 234 halaman
...from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing; or if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong." (See, for example, Livermore and Meehl, 1 967,i Clearly, the M'Naghten rule implies that the perpetrator... | |
 | Elyn R. Saks, Stephen H. Behnke - 2000 - 284 halaman
...result of mental illness, he did not know "the nature and quality of the act he was doing; or, if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong" (M'Naghten's Case 1843, 722). The balance of tests for insanity generally look to a combination of... | |
| |
