 | Leonard W. Levy - 462 halaman
...government is supreme; state constitutions and laws to the contrary are "absolutely void." The states "are members of one great empire — for some purposes sovereign, for some purposes subordinate." The role of the federal judiciary, Marshall concluded, was to void state judgments that might contravene... | |
 | Jean Edward Smith - 1998 - 788 halaman
...within the American territory. The constitution and laws of a State, so far as they are repugnant to the Constitution and laws of the United States, are absolutely...purposes sovereign, for some purposes subordinate. Marshall said that "after having bestowed upon this question the most deliberate consideration of which... | |
 | R. Kent Newmyer - 2001 - 552 halaman
...The constitution and the laws of a state, so far as they are repugnant to the constitution and the laws of the United States, are absolutely void. These...— for some purposes sovereign, for some purposes subordinate.68 The doctrine here is familiar, but the words warrant notice because they display not... | |
 | R. Kent Newmyer - 2001 - 552 halaman
...The constitution and the laws of a state, so far as they are repugnant to the constitution and the laws of the United States, are absolutely void. These...of the United States; they are members of one great empire—for some purposes sovereign, for some purposes subordinate. 68 The doctrine here is familiar,... | |
 | James F. Simon - 2003 - 356 halaman
...within the American territory. The constitution and laws of a state, so far as they are repugnant to the Constitution and laws of the United States, are absolutely...purposes sovereign, for some purposes subordinate. With that stirring declaration of an indivisible union, Marshall rejected Virginia's claim of immunity... | |
 | Daniel A. Farber - 2003 - 272 halaman
...independent sovereigns, Marshall said, the states are "constituent parts of the United States" — "members of one great empire — for some purposes sovereign, for some purposes subordinate." Logically, then, the federal government's judicial organ should be supreme in interpreting federal... | |
 | Albert Jeremiah Beveridge - 2005 - 705 halaman
...within the American territory. The Constitution and laws of a state, so far as they are repugnant to the Constitution and laws of the United States, are absolutely...United States. They are members of one great empire." l The National Court alone can decide all questions arising under the Constitution and laws of the... | |
 | Alan Wolfe - 2009 - 256 halaman
...governments have no independent sovereignty; they are instead "constituent parts of the United States" and "members of one great empire — for some purposes sovereign, for some purposes subordinate." When states rights advocates challenged his opinion, Marshall responded in an anonymous pamphlet by... | |
 | Indiana State Bar Association (1916- ) - 1901 - 186 halaman
...within the American territory. The constitution and laws of a state, so far as they are repugnant to the constitution and laws of the United States, are absolutely void. These states arcconstituent parts of the United States. They are members of one great empire, for some purposes... | |
| |
... The people have declared, that in the exercise of all powers given for these objects, it is supreme. It can, then, in effecting these objects, legitimately control all individuals or governments within the American territory. The constitution and... 
