| Ohio. General Assembly - 1843 - 1074 halaman
...always some misunderstanding, and every thing continued doubtful and wonderfully uncertain between the "party of the first part," and the "party of the second part." A number of days were thus spent, without the apparent prospect of any satisfactory agreement, when... | |
| Samuel Owen - 1845 - 434 halaman
...behalf of the State of Michigan, for the purpose of settling with the party of the first part, parties of the second part witnesseth : " That the party of the first part, for the purpose aforesaid, doth hereby assign, transfer, and set over to the parties of the second... | |
| Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1888 - 666 halaman
...part, and the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company by their agent, EL Dudley, parties of the second part, witnesseth : That the party of the first part, for and in consideration of the undertakings of the said parties of the second part, hereinafter mentioned,... | |
| Alabama. Supreme Court - 1878 - 738 halaman
...1858, between Eeuben Chapman, of Madison county, of the first part, and John E. Lee, of Sumter county, of the second part, witnesseth : That the party of the first part has this day bargained and sold to the party of the second part all his lands lying and being in township... | |
| New Jersey. Court of Chancery, George Blight Halstead - 1849 - 724 halaman
...elected under the charter of the said company, of the first part, and Luther Loomis and Samuel P. Lyman of the second part, witnesseth, that the party of the first part, for 3000 dollars in •hand paid by the parties of the second part, the receipt whereof is acknowledged... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1910 - 806 halaman
...Company, a corporation, party of the first part, and the Field Pure Ice Company, a corporation, party of the second part, witnesseth : That the party of the first part, in consideration of the agree312 161 MICHIGAN RBPORTS. [May ments hereinafter contained to be performed by the party... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1852 - 668 halaman
...and only one of the persons of the first part signed the instrument, and the covenant ran between the party of the first part and the party of the second part, it was proper for the person who had signed on the first part to sue alone ; because the covenant enured... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1905 - 798 halaman
...State of Illinois, of the first part, and Charles T. Harvey, of Marquette County, State of Michigan, of the second part, " Witnesseth, that the party of the first part has this day conveyed by 'warrantee' deed (to which this contract is attached) to the party of the... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1913 - 804 halaman
...per foot for each and every foot of casing so drawn out of the well by him. " In witness whereof, the party of the first part and the party of the second part have hereunto signed this duplicate agreement, the day and year first above written. " ALEXANDER H.... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1885 - 734 halaman
...expenses has been paid ; that said agreement is to hold good for the term of ten years, unless the party of the first part and the party of the second part agree mutually to withdraw from said drug business, or by their consent change it into some other business... | |
| |