 | 1881 - 406 halaman
...Supreme Court in the case of "Gibbons vs. Ogden" (9 Wheaten 184) says: "The framers of the Constitution and the people who adopted it, must be understood...employed words in their natural sense, and to have understood what they meant." Mr. Cooley upon this same subject further says: "It is possible however... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1882 - 912 halaman
...subject is thus stated by MARSHALL, CJ, in Gibbons v. Oyden, 4 Wheat. 188. Thcframers of the Constitution and the people who adopted it " must be understood...sense, and to have intended what they have said." Cooley's Const. Lim. 72. We find nothing in the Constitution which shows that the word is used in the... | |
 | Iowa. General Assembly - 1884 - 1392 halaman
...aptly express the ideas they intend to convey, the enlightened patriots who framed our constitution, and the people who adopted it, must be understood...they have said. If, from the imperfection of human lariguage, there should be serious doubts respecting the extent of any given power, It is a well settled... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1889 - 768 halaman
...aptly express the ideas they intend to convey, the enlightened patriots who framed our Constitution, and the people who adopted it, must be understood...natural sense and to have intended what they have said." Gibbons v. Ogden, xupra, at page 188. No distinction is more popular to the common mind, or more clearly... | |
 | 1884 - 948 halaman
...by Chief Justice MARSHALL, in Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 188, that the framersof the constitution, and the people who adopted it, must be understood...natural sense, and to have intended what they have said. It is no answer to this view of the subject to say: "If the legislature can say that a greater number... | |
 | 1884 - 1006 halaman
...by Chief Justice Marshall in Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 188, that the framers of the constitution, and the people who adopted it, must be understood...natural sense, and to have intended what they have said. CoL] {, 'S1°° °f °f!lt ALEXANDER v. PEOPLE. 97 f tliof!lt t° effect the same, and thereby render... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1884 - 934 halaman
...57, 58. Says Marshall, Ch. J., (Gibbons vs. Ogden, 9 Wheat., 188), "The framers of the constitution, and the people who adopted it, must be understood...employed words in their natural sense, and to have understood what they meant/' " This," remarks Judge Cooley (Const. Lim., p. 58 marg.). "is but saying... | |
 | 1918 - 1228 halaman
...Wheat. 1, 6 L. Ed. 23, at page 188, expresses the idea when he says that the framers of the Constitution must be understood to have employed words in their...natural sense and to have intended what they have said. The application of this rule would forbid forced or unnatural construction to be put upon the language... | |
 | 1884 - 940 halaman
...v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 188, that the framersof the constitution, and the people who adopted it, must he understood to have employed words in their natural sense, and to have intended what they have said. It is no answer to this view of the subject to say: "If the legislature can say that a greater number... | |
 | 1891 - 1158 halaman
...employed in their natural and ordinary meaning. As MARSHALL, CJ, says, the framers of the constitution and the people •who adopted it 'must be understood to have employed words in their natural eense, and to have intended what they have said.' This is but Haying that no forced or unnatural construction... | |
| |
As men whose intentions require no concealment generally employ the words which most directly and aptly express the ideas they intend to convey, the enlightened patriots who framed our Constitution, and the people who adopted it, must be understood to... 
