 | Alabama. Supreme Court - 1916
...the limits of its authority. If, therefore, a statute purporting to have been enacted to protect the public health, the public morals, or the public safety has no real or substantial relation to those objects, or is a palpable invasion of rights secured by the fundamental law, it is the duty of... | |
 | 1920
...limitations upon such statutes: therefore, a statute purporting to have been ennctcd to protect the public health, the public morals, or the public safety has no real or substantial relation to those objects, or is a palpable invasion of rights secured by the fundamental law, it is the duty of... | |
 | Leslie Friedman Goldstein - 1988 - 637 halaman
...legislature has done comes within the rule that if a statute purporting to have been enacted to protect the public health, the public morals or the public safety, has no real or substantial relation to those objects, or is beyond all question, a plain, palpable invasion of rights secured by the fundamental... | |
 | David P. Currie - 1992 - 504 halaman
...misled by mere pretences .... If , therefore, a statute purporting to have been enacted to protect the public health, the public morals, or the public safety, has no real or substantial relation to those objects, ... it is the duty of the courts to so adjudge, and thereby to give effect to the Constitution.... | |
 | Donald E. Lively - 1992 - 168 halaman
...the limits of its authority. If, therefore, a statute purporting to have been enacted to protect the public health, the public morals, or the public safety, has no real or substantial relation to those objects, or is a palpable invasion of rights secured by the fundamental law, it is the duty of... | |
 | California. Supreme Court - 1906
...the limits of its authority. If, therefore, a statute purporting to have been enacted to protect the public health, the public morals, or the public safety has no real or substantial relation to those objects, or is a palpable invasion of rights secured by the fundamental law, it is the duty of... | |
 | Christopher Wolfe - 1994 - 447 halaman
...the limits of its authority. If, therefore, a statute purporting to have been enacted to protect the public health, the public morals, or the public safety, has no real or substantial relation to those objects, or is a palpable invasion of rights secured by the fundamental law, it is the duty of... | |
 | Howard Gillman - 1993 - 317 halaman
...the limits of its authority. If, therefore, a statute purporting to have been enacted to protect the public health, the public morals, or the public safety, has no real or substantial relation to those objects, or is a palpable invasion of rights secured by the fundamental law, it is the duty of... | |
 | Dana E. Bushnell - 1995 - 402 halaman
...Ho v. Williamson, the courts held: "If ... a statute purporting to have been enacted to protect the public health, the public morals, or the public safety, has no real or substantial relation to those objects ... it is the duty of the courts to so adjudge, and thereby give effect to the constitution."20... | |
 | Stefano Scoglio - 1998 - 260 halaman
...legislature has done comes within the rule that, if a statute purporting to have been enacted to protect the public health, the public morals, or the public safety has no real or substantial relation to those objects, or is, beyond all question, a plain, palpable invasion of rights secured by the fundamental... | |
| |
If, therefore, a statute purporting to have been enacted to protect the public health, the public morals, or the public safety, has no real or substantial relation to those objects, or is a palpable invasion of rights secured by the fundamental law, it... 
