...the drawer. In Gale v. Walsh, 5 TR 239, decided in 1793, the principle appears to be recognized ; but a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted for this cause was discharged, because the fact did not exist in the case. These are the earliest cases...

...$<J,000 should be awarded for the pecuniary loss sustained, and $2,000 as compensation for suffering. Rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted on the ground that the verdict is excessive. Willard P. Voorhees, for the rule. Joseph E. Strieker,...

...subjects-of "Value" and "Notice" special topics in ihU collection of cases. — ED. F. PoUocJc now moved for a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted on the ground that the learned judge had erroneously ruled the point at Nisi Prius. He contended that,...

...intimation to that effect. An instrument in the form of a letter held to be a valid will. IN ejectment. On rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted. BC Chetwood and Malcomb Campbell, for the plaintiff. Joel Parker, for the defendants. The opinion of...

...evidence. A compulsory nonsuit was entered and a motion to take off the same was made. The Court entered a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted, for the purpose of considering the rulings at the trial, by which plaintiff's evidence was rejected....

...not libelous. Id. 1044. But, before the motion In arrest of Judgment was argued, Mr. Ersklne obtained a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted, principally npon the ground that the judge told the Jury that the question whether libel or not was...

...guilty, and this was accordingly done. The defendants moved in arrest of judgment, and have also obtained a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted. Under the sixth section of the Act of June 13, 1836, PL, 551, it is provided that " public roads or...

...are of the opinion that the defendant should be granted a new trial. We, therefore, make absolute the rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted. There is no merit in the contention of the defendant that he is justified in refusing to pay the check...

...the objection to the admission of the record, and held the judgment to be conclusiye. Upon motion for a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted, the court of king's bench held the record of the former judgment admissible, but that it was not conclusive....

...lost, no action could be maintained on the original debt. A verdict was taken for the plaintiff, and a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted «»vas discharged. Lord Ellenborough laid some stress on the circumstance that the name of Tucker,,...