...statutory construction is that the intent of the lawmaker is to be found in the language that he has used. He is presumed to know the meaning of words and the rules of grammar." "Very strong expressions have been used by the courts," says an eminent law writer, "to emphasize the...

...the revisers and Congress. In United States v. Goldenberg, 168 US 95, 102, 18 Sup. Ct. 3, 42 L. Ed. 394, it is said : "The primary and general rule of...legislation, and simply seek to ascertain the will of the le.s islator. It Is true, there are cases in which the letter of the statute Is not deemed controlling,...

...for believing that the letter does not fully and accurately disclose the intent, for the "lawmaker is presumed to know the meaning of words and the rules of grammar." As in that case (US v. Goldenberg, 168 US 95, 18 Sup. Ct. 3, 42 L. Ed. 394), so in this, the language...

...statutory construction is that the intent of the lawmaker is to be found in the language that he has used. He is presumed to know the meaning of words...cases in which the letter of the statute is not deemed con'The above quoted provisions of section 315 have been segregated in order to present concisely the...

...why they were excluded from its provisions. Denn ex dem. Scott v. Reid, 10 Pet. 524, 9 L. ed. 519. The courts have no function of legislation, and simply seek to ascertain the will of the legislator; and no mere omission, no mere failure to provide for contingencies which it may seem wise to have specifically...

...construction is that the intent of the lawmaker is to be found in the language that he has used. lie is presumed to know the meaning of words and the rules of grammar. The courts nave no function of legislation, and simply seek to ascertain the will of the legislator. It is true...

...grammatical construction sustains the importers' position, because the rule is well settled that the lawmaker is presumed to know the meaning of words and the rules of grammar and that a statute will be read and understood accordingly, unless it is apparent that something different...

...in the App.] Nussdorfer v. State, ex rel. Miller. language that he has incorporated in the statute. He is presumed to know the meaning of words and the rules of grammar ; and courts have no function of legislation, but must construe and interpret a statute by means of...

...the subject with good sense. For example, the Supreme Court of Florida has stated: "The legislature is presumed to know the meaning of words and the rules of grammar, and the only way that a court is advised of what the legislature intends is by giving the generally...

...(168 US, 95, 102), "is that the intent of the lawmaker is to be found in that language that he has used. He is presumed to know the meaning of words and the rules of grammar." The word " immigration" means the act of immigrating, and to immigrate is to come into a country of which...