 | Idaho. Supreme Court - 1904 - 896 halaman
...These are distinctions which do not furnish any proper basis for the attempted classification. That must always rest upon some difference which bears...to the act in respect to which the classification ie proposed, and can never be made arbitrarily, and without such basis. No duty rests more impressively... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1903 - 1084 halaman
...business, could not so sue ; in other words, to permit a classification based on "some different bearing a reasonable and just relation to the act in respect to which the classification is proposed": Ellis' Case, 165 US 150, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 255. The use of the word "class," in the last clause of section... | |
 | 1903 - 1046 halaman
...individuals outside of the classes, these classifications must not be arbitrary or unreasonable, but must rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable and just relation to the act In respect of which the classification is proposed. I.uman v. Kitchens Bros. Co. 90 Md. 14, 46 LRA 393, 44 Atl.... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1903 - 1410 halaman
...each class. But buch classification must not be based upon arbitrary or irrelevant distinctions. It "must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable and just relation tē the act in respect to which the classification is proposed." Gulf, C. £ SFR Co. v. Ellis, 165... | |
 | 1903 - 1040 halaman
...classes, these classifications must not be arbitrary or unreasonable, but must rest upon some difieren«' which bears a reasonable and just relation to the act in respect of which the classification Is pro are of an unusual character unknown to the ” posed. I.uman v. Httcnens... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Charles Frederick Remy, George Washington Self, Philip Zoercher, William H. Adams, Mrs. Edward Franklin White, Emma Mary May - 1914 - 856 halaman
...proper basis for the VOL. 179—20 Morgan v. State — 179 Ind. 300. attempted classification. That must always rest upon some difference which bears...classification is proposed, and can never be made abitrarily and without any such basis." In the case of Atchis&n, etc., R. Co. v. Matthews (1899), 174... | |
 | 1904 - 1062 halaman
...business could not so sue; in other words, to permit a classification based on "some difference bearing a reasonable and just relation to the act in respect to which the classification is proposed." КШа'а Case, 165 US 150, 41 L. ed. 660, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 255. The use of the word "class," in the... | |
 | 1904 - 1070 halaman
...business could not so sue; in other words, to permit a classification based on "some difference bearing a reasonable and just relation to the act in respect to which thfi classification is proposed." Kllit'i Case, 165 US 150, 41 L. ed. 666, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 255. The... | |
 | 1905 - 976 halaman
...Ellis, 165 US 150, 41 L. ed. OG6, "must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable an>1 just relation to the act in respect to which the classification is proposed, and can nev^r be made arbitrarily, and without any such basis." In the case just cited a statute of Texas imposing... | |
 | Vermont. Supreme Court - 1905 - 562 halaman
...the attempted classification in a statute thus limited as to the objects to which it is directed must rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable and just relation to some one of the same ends, for that is the act in respect to which the classification is proposed.... | |
| |
For this court has held that classification " must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable and just relation to the act in respect to which the classification is proposed and can never be made arbitrarily and without any such basis. 
