... so as, if possible, to form one consistent whole.'" (Civ. Code, sec. 1321.) But it was also said: "A codicil is never construed to disturb the dispositions of the will further than is absolutely necessary for the purpose of giving effect to the codicil... Pittsburgh Legal Journal - Halaman 3011885Tampilan utuh - Tentang buku ini
| North Carolina. Supreme Court - 1892 - 1048 halaman
...codicil, but it is a well settled rule that such clear dispositions of property will not be disturbed further than is absolutely necessary for the purpose of giving effect to the codicil. It may be said that a codicil is not a revocation of the will, except in the exact degree... | |
| David Shephard Garland, James Cockcroft, Lucius Polk McGehee, Charles Porterfield - 1898 - 1206 halaman
...— It is an invariable rule that a codicil will not disturb or alter the dispositions of the will further than is absolutely necessary for the purpose of giving effect to the codicil.5 two trustees. By a codicil he appointed another person to be a trustee and executor of... | |
| Delaware. Court of Chancery - 1899 - 512 halaman
...harmonize with the body of the will. It is the established rule not to disturb the dispositions of the will further than is absolutely necessary for the purpose of giving effect to the codicil. 1 Jarman on Wills, 342-349 (Bigelow, 5th ed.); Norman v. Kynaston, 3 DeG., F. & J. 29;... | |
| George Purcell Costigan - 1910 - 810 halaman
...1321. But it was also said : "A codicil is never construed to disturb the dispositions of the will further than is absolutely necessary for the purpose of giving effect to the codicil. 1 Jarman on Wills, 176. 'The dispositions made by a will are not to be disturbed by a... | |
| George Purcell Costigan - 1910 - 874 halaman
...§ 1321. But it was also said: "A codicil is never construed to disturb the dispositions of the will further than is absolutely necessary for the purpose of giving effect to the codicil. 1 Jarman on Wills, 176. 'The dispositions made by a will are not to be disturbed by a... | |
| Joseph Warren - 1917 - 906 halaman
...1321.) But it was also said: "A codicil is never construed to disturb the dispositions of the will further than is absolutely necessary for the purpose of giving effect to the codicil (1 Jarman on Wills, 176.) 'The dispositions made by a will are not to be disturbed by a... | |
| New South Wales. Supreme Court - 1903 - 790 halaman
...to his unborn children. It is well settled that a codicil will not affect the dispositions of a will further than is absolutely necessary for the purpose of giving effect to the codicil, that is, further than the codicil expresses either directly or by necessary implication.... | |
| California. Supreme Court - 1903 - 880 halaman
...1321.) But it was also said: "A codicil is never construed to disturb the dispositions of the will further than is absolutely necessary for the purpose of giving effect to the codicil. (1 Jarman on Wills, 176.) 'The dispositions made by a will are not to be disturbed by... | |
| California. Supreme Court - 1906 - 750 halaman
...whole." (Civ. Code, sec. 1321.) A codicil is never construed to disturb the dispositions of the will further than is absolutely necessary for the purpose of giving effect to the codicil. (1 Jarman on Wills, *176.) "The disposition made by a will are not to be disturbed by... | |
| Pennsylvania. Supreme Court - 1861 - 594 halaman
...they are allowed to prevail over the former, it is settled that a prior devise must be disturbed no further than is absolutely necessary for the purpose of giving effect to the posterior qualifying disposition : 1 Jarman on Wills 414. The bequest here is " for life and in... | |
| |