 ... for the frauds, deceits, concealments, misrepresentations, torts, negligences, and other malfeasances, or misfeasances, and omissions of duty, of his agent in the course of his employment, although the principal did not authorize, or justify, or participate...  Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Judicature ... - Halaman 231oleh New York (State). Supreme Court, John Lansing Wendell - 1847Tampilan utuh - Tentang buku ini
 | Thomas Whitney Waterman - 1875 - 756 halaman
...duty. It may be observed that the principal is liable in a civil suit to third persons for the torts of his agent in the course of his employment, although the principal did not authorize, or indeed know, of such misconduct, or even if he forbade the acts or disapproved of them.2 This rule... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1875 - 866 halaman
...torts, negligences, and other malfeasances and misfeances, and omissions of duty, of his agent, in (he course of his employment, although the principal did not authorize, or justify, or participate in, or, indeed, know of such misconduct, or even if he forbade the acts, or disapproved... | |
 | 1875 - 202 halaman
...generally the principal will be liable to indemnify third parties, civilly for the frauds, negligences or omissions of duty of his agent, in the course of his employment, and that although the principal did not know far less authorize the act of which complaint is made... | |
 | Nathaniel Cleveland Moak - 1877 - 1000 halaman
...that the principal is liable to third persons in a civil suit "for the frauds, deceits, concealments, misrepresentations, torts, negligences, and other...although the principal did not authorize, or justify, or participate in, or indeed know of such misconduct, or even if he forbade the acts, or disapproved of... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1894 - 588 halaman
...misdeeds, yet he is held liable to third persons in a civil suit for the frauds, deceits, concealments, misrepresentations, torts, negligences, and other...although the principal did not authorize or justify or participate in, or indeed know of, such misconduct, or even if he forbade the acts or disapproved of... | |
 | 1878 - 680 halaman
...the law is that the principal is liable to the third pereon for the frauds, deceits, concealmcnta, misrepresentations, torts, negligences, and other...duty of his agent in the course of his employment. Story on Agency, § 452 ; Shearman & Kedfield on Negligence, § 05 ; Lane v. Sir Kobert Cotton, 12... | |
 | 1878 - 442 halaman
...of the law is, that the principal is liable to third persons for the frauds, deceits, concealments, misrepresentations, torts, negligences, and other...duty of his agent in the course of his employment. (Story on Agency, § 452.) The rule is founded on public policy and convenience, for in no other way... | |
 | Nebraska. Supreme Court, David Allen Campbell, Guy Ashton Brown, Lorenzo Crounse, Walter Alber Leese, Lee Herdmen, Henry Clay Lindsay, Henry Paxon Stoddart - 1879 - 658 halaman
...the principal is held liable to third persons in a civil suit for the frauds, torts, negligence, &c., of his agent in the course of his employment, although the principal did not authorize or justify said acts. In all such cases the rule respondeat superior applies. The Atlantic £ Great Western RW... | |
 | Illinois. Appellate Court, James Bolesworth Bradwell - 1879 - 712 halaman
...appellant, and cited Cutler v. Smith, 57 111. 252. The principal is liable for the torts of his agent done in the course of his employment, although the principal did not authorize them : Story on Agency, §452; Phil. & Read. R'y Co. v. Derby, 20 Curtis, 291 ; Rausden v. Boston &... | |
 | George Washington Field - 1881 - 620 halaman
...deceits, concealments, misrepresentations, torts, negligences and other malfeasances and misfeasances of his agent in the course of his employment, although the principal did not authorize, justify or participate in, or indeed know of, such misconduct, or even if he forbade the acts, or disapproved-... | |
| |
