...consider that Efflnger, If not at the moment engaged in strictly interstate transportation, was employed 'in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of if within the 'true test' formulated In Shanks v. DL & W. Ry. Co., 239 US 556, 36 S. Ct. 188. 60 L....

...was injured while engaged either directly in inter state transportation, or, certainly, in work 'a closely related to it as to be practically a part of it,' and that is said in Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. Co.. supra, to t» the test. So we...

...test being whether at the time of the injury the employe was engaged in interstate transportation or work so closely related to it as to be practically a part thereof. — Grand Trunk Western Ry. Co. v. Industrial Commission, 111.. 125 N. E. US. 21. ContrnctN...

...US 260. 9 NCCA 1, att'g 158 App. Div. <NT) 891. of the injury, engaged in interstate transportation or in work so closely related to it as to be practically part of it?"2 Most railroad tracks are used in both interstate and intrastate commerce, but when j...

...in dismissing the case for want of jurisdiction, because plaintiff at time of the injuries was not engaged in interstate commerce, or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it, and therefore could not properly sue under the Federal Employers' Liability Act of 1908 (45 USCA §§...

...interstate commerce as depending upon whether the employee was engaged in interstate transportation, or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it. There the plaintiff had been injured while engaged in altering the location of a fixture in a machine...

...US 556, 558, namely, "was the employe at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it," this court said (p. 180), " Manifestly, there BLQCKBURGER v. UNITED STATES. 299 296 Syllabus. was no such...

...asking the question, "Was the employee, nt the time of the injury, engaged in interstate transportation or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it?" Applying this test, the court held that under the evidence the telephone exchange was an integral part...

...is: "Was the employé at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation or in work во closely related to it as to be practically a part of it?" Baltimore, etc.. R. Co. v. Faust (1026; Ind. App.) 150 NE 239, and cases there cited. In the case of...

...the Workmen's Compensation Law, § 33, and not engaged in interstate transportation or in work во closely related to it as to be practically a part of it, so that his dependents were entitled to compensation under the state law, and not required to bring...