...Liability Act, to wit, "Was the employee at the time of his injury engaged in interstate transportation, or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it?" has been stated as the rule of decision in Sullivan v. Baltimore & 634 635 •OR Co. (1922) 272 Pa....

...sense intended, is, was the employe at the time of the injury engaged in inter-state transportation or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it?" The rule thus stated is, perhaps, too broad ; it might be a better statement if it were modified to...

...Employers' Liability Act he must, at the time of the injury, be engaged either in interstate transportation or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it. The court then continued : "While the rule is well established, much difficulty arises over its application...

...out freight for delivery to consignees, held to have boen employed in interstate transportation, OP in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it, and within Employers' Liability Act April 22, 1908, i 1 (Сотр. St. | 8G57). Delaware, L. & WR Co....

...that plaintiff was injured while engaged, either directly in interstate transportation, or certainly in work 'so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it.'" •I'll. Watchmen, flagmen, and policemen. Supplementing annotations in 10 ALR 1234 ; 14 ALR 736. A...

...consider that Effinger, if not at the moment engaged in strictly interstate transportation, was employed 'in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it' within the 'true test' formulated in Shanks v. DL & W. Ry. Co., 239 US 556, 36 S. Ct. 188, 60 L. Ed....

...interstate commerce. The employee at the time of the injury must be engaged in interstate transportation or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it, in order to displace State jurisdiction and make applicable the Federal act. C. & O. Ry. Co. v. Mizelle,...

...Sup. Ct. 188: "Was the employee at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation or any work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it?" In that case a machinist usually employed on repairing locomotives in use in interstate and intrastate...

...whether the employee at the time of the injury was engaged in interstate transportation, or In anything so closely related to it as to be practically a part of It [Ed. Note. — For other definitions, see Words and Phrases, First and Second Series, Interstate Commerce.]...

...employee at the time of injury may be considered to have been "engaged in interstate transportation or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it."1 But even with this rule as a guide, the dividing line between interstate and intrastate employment...