...commerce within the Workmen's Compensation Law, § 33, and not engaged in interstate transportation or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it, so that his dependents were entitled to compensation under the state law, and not required to bring...

...interstate commerce is whether the employé, when injured, was engaged in interstate transportation, or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part thereof; there being in such cases a distinction between a mere expectation that particular work done...

...act. The test is: 'Was the employe1 at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation, or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it?' Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RE Co., 239 US 556, 558 [36 Sup. Ct. 188, 189, 60 L. Ed. 436,...

...interstate commerce as depending upon whether the employee was engaged in interstate transportation, or in work so closely related to it as to be practically 171 LC. С a part of it. There the plaintiff had been injured while engaged in altering the location...

...United States to be "was the employee at the time of the Injury engaged in interstate transportation, or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it"? The deceased was engaged in working upon an insulator that supported a wire that was actually in use...

...requirement is that the employee shall, at the time of the injury, be engaged in interstate transportation, or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of interstate transportation (Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RR Co., 239 US 556, 558; Fish v....

...interstate commerce is: Was t bo employee, at the time of the injury, engaged in interstate transportation, or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it?15 Another test applied in some .eases is to consider the effect of the employee's injury on the...

...Rep. 902). In neither instance could the service indicated be said to be interstate transportation, or so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it. Coming to apply the test to the case in hand, it it plain that Shanks was not employed in interstate...

...sense intended is, Was the employee, at the time of the injury, engaged in interstate transportation, or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it ?" And it was also well expressed by the supreme court of Wisconsin in Graber v. Duluth, etc., R. Co.,...

...sense intended, is, was the employe at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it?" Appeals Involving Questions of Interstate Commerce. tiff was a brakeman of a switching crew engaged...