| Arthur Jacobson - 2000 - 436 halaman
...of a stamte of a state on the ground of its being repugnant to the constimtion, treaties, or laws of the United States, and the decision is in favor of its validity, may be reexamined in the Supreme Court of the United States. The idea was that interpretation of the... | |
| Edwin S. Gaustad, Mark A. Noll - 2003 - 652 halaman
...state of Georgia, for four years, was pronounced by that court under colour of a law which is void, as being repugnant to the constitution, treaties, and laws of the United States, and ought, therefore, to be reversed and annulled. Suggested Reading (Chapter Five) The antebellum period... | |
| Jill Norgren - 2004 - 224 halaman
...state of Georgia, for four years, was pronounced by that court under colour of law which is void, as being repugnant to the constitution, treaties, and laws of the United States, and ought, therefore, to be reversed and annulled. Endnotes Introduction 1. Office of the Governor of the... | |
| Edward Charles Valandra - 2010 - 320 halaman
...state of Georgia, for four years, was pronounced by that court under colour of a law which is void, as being repugnant to the constitution, treaties, and laws of the United States, and ought, therefore, to be reversed and annulled. 74 These two Supreme Court decisions involving the Cherokee... | |
| Daniel Walker Howe - 2007 - 926 halaman
...act of Georgia under which the missionaries had been convicted and imprisoned was declared "void, as being repugnant to the constitution, treaties, and laws of the United States." The decision represented the legal vindication of all the Cherokees had maintained.81 Embarrassingly... | |
| Theda Perdue, Michael D. Green - 2007 - 220 halaman
...on March 3. The law Samuel A. Worcester was convicted of violating, the Court found, was "void, as repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, and laws of the United States," and the conviction should be "reversed and annulled.""' The lasting significance of this decision is less... | |
| 1832 - 862 halaman
...right, privilege, or exemption, specially set up and claimed under them." They also draw into question the validity of a statute of the State of Georgia,...repugnant to the constitution, treaties, and laws of the U. States, and the decision is in favor of its validity." It is, then, we think, too clear for controversy,... | |
| 1832 - 534 halaman
...iriiht, privilege, or exemption, specially set up and claimed under them." They also draw into question the validity of a statute of the state of Georgia, "on the ground of ng repug of the United States, and the decision is in favor of it: its being repugnant to the constitution,... | |
| |