 | Chrisenberry Lee Bates - 1908 - 644 halaman
...drawn in question the validity of a state statute on the ground of its being repugnant to a law of the United States, and the decision is in favor of its validity. (7) Where is drawn in question the validity of an authority is Smith v. Indiana, 191 US First National... | |
 | George Washington Rightmire - 1917 - 928 halaman
...under, the state is drawn in question, on the ground of its repugnancy to the constitution and laws of the United States, and the decision is in favor of its validity. Its appellate jurisdiction over the judgments of the state courts in such cases, and other cases mentioned... | |
 | William Mark McKinney, Burdett Alberto Rich - 1920 - 1544 halaman
...is drawn in question on the ground of its being repugnant to the constitution, treaties or laws of the United States and the decision is in favor of its validity, it may be re-examined and reversed or affirmed in the supreme court on a writ of error.8 In order to sustain... | |
 | Samuel Gordon Heiskell - 1920 - 806 halaman
...State of Georgia for four years, was pronounced by that court under color of a law which is void, as being repugnant to the constitution, treaties and laws of the United States, and ought, therefore, to be reversed and annulled." Horace Greely says in his American Conflict that George... | |
 | William Stewart Simkins - 1923 - 1730 halaman
...question the validity of a statute of, or authority exercised under, any State on the ground of their being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, and laws of the United States and the decision is against their validity; or where any right, title, privilege, or immunity is claimed... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1924 - 90 halaman
...statute of any State on the ground of its being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States, and the decision is in favor of its validity, may be reviewed by the Supreme Court upon a writ of error. The writ shall have the same effect as if... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1924 - 90 halaman
...statute of a State is drawn in question as being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States and the decision is in favor of its validity. As t*> these rases the bill would permit a review on writ of error as of right, or on certiorari if... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1924 - 922 halaman
...statute of any State, on the ground of its being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States, and the decision Is in favor of its validity, may be reviewed by the Supreme Court upon a writ of error. The writ shall have the same effect as if... | |
 | United States U.S. Congress. House. Judiciary committee - 1924 - 36 halaman
...statute of a State is drawn in qucs tion as being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States and the decision is in favor of its validity- As tc these cases the bill would permit a review on writ of error as >it right, or on certiorari if... | |
 | Sir Mark Frank Lindley - 1926 - 424 halaman
...States Govern- Kent-. ment, those statutes were declared to be null and void by the Supreme Court as being repugnant to the constitution, treaties, and laws of the United States. e Potcn, sic. The Committee of the House of Kepresentatives who were appointed to consider the proposal... | |
| |
... where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of the United States, and the decision is against its validity; or where is drawn in question the validity of a statute of any State on the ground of its being repugnant to the Constitution,... 
