...v. Saunders (1827), 12 Wheat. 213, 270; Woodbury, J., in Planters Bank v. Sharp (1848), 6 How. 301. "Every possible presumption is in favor of the validity...until the contrary is shown beyond a rational doubt." Strong, J., in Legal Tender Cases (1871), 12 Wall. 457, 521 ; Waite, CJ, in Sinking Fund Cases (1879),...

...economics, yet a painstaking examination of the authorities, when examined in the light of the rule that "every possible presumption is in favor of the validity...until the contrary is shown beyond a rational doubt" (Sinking Fund Cases, 99 US 700, 25 L. Ed. 496), forces the conclusion that the uneonstitutionality...

...559, LRA1916F, 177, 145 S. W. 177; Nance v. Piano Co. 128 Tenn. 1, 155 SW 1172, Ann. Cas. 1914D, 834. ses involving transit or reconsignment privileges in blanket territory, the construction must be such as to save the statute if it is reasonably possible to do so. Plymouth...

...Chief Justice Waite. speaking for the court in Sinking Fund Cases (99 US 700). said at page 718: " Every possible presumption is in favor of the validity...continues until the contrary is shown beyond a rational donbt. One branch of the Government can not encroach upon the domain of another without danger. The...

...Colorado. January 4, 1024.) No. 7473. 1. Constitutional law €=348 — Constitutionality presumed. Every possible presumption is in favor of the validity...this continues until the contrary is shown beyond a reasonable doubt. 2. Courts <g=»366(l)— State Supreme Court's construction of state statute binding....

...presumption, to use the language of Chief Justice Waite in the Sinking Fund Cases (99 US, 700-718) is indulged "in favor of the validity of a statute, and this continues...until the contrary is shown beyond a rational doubt." And it is held that where it does not appear upon the face of the statute, or from any facts of which...

...police power for the purpose of dealing with it in public interest." EVERY POSSIBLE PRESUMPTION IS IS FAVOR OF THE VALIDITY OF A STATUTE AND THIS CONTINUES...UNTIL THE CONTRARY IS SHOWN BEYOND A RATIONAL DOUBT In Atkins v. Kansas (191 US 207), at page 233, the court says: " So, also, if it be said that a statute...

...sustain an appropriate resort to the police power for the purpose of dealing with it in public interest." EVERY POSSIBLE PRESUMPTION IS IN FAVOR OF THE VALIDITY OF A STATUTE AND THIS CONTINUES UNTIL THE CONTEAl'.Y 18 SHOWN BEYOND A RATIONAL DOUBT In Atkins t>. Kansas (191 US 20T), at page 233, the court...

...police power for the purpose of dealing with it in public interest." EVEBY POSSIBLE PRESUMPTION 18 IN FAVOR OF THE VALIDITY OF A STATUTE AND THIS CONTINUES UNTIL THE CONTRARY TS SHOWN BEYOND A RATIONAL DOUBT In Atkins v. Kansas (191 US 207), at page 233, the court says: " So...

...recognize the new trend. - Cooler, Constitutional Limitations, pp. 216-218. "Every possible prrsumption is in favor of the validity of a statute, and this...doubt. One branch of the government can not encroach or, the domain of another without danger. The safety of our institutions depends in no small degree...