Albany Law Journal, Volume 40Weed, Parsons & Company, 1890 |
Dari dalam buku
Hasil 6-10 dari 79
Halaman 36
... give their opinions in evidence with respect to its value on condemnation proceedings , and such opinions are com- petent evidence , although such farmers may not know of any sale of any farm in that vicinity . It is claimed that only ...
... give their opinions in evidence with respect to its value on condemnation proceedings , and such opinions are com- petent evidence , although such farmers may not know of any sale of any farm in that vicinity . It is claimed that only ...
Halaman 41
I for making any comment which may pretext always give us pleasure to find a pretext " bustle , " and all that sort ... gives up that gun . Although an expert shot , she ought not to shoot birds as she does . Mrs. Julia Ward Howe owns up ...
I for making any comment which may pretext always give us pleasure to find a pretext " bustle , " and all that sort ... gives up that gun . Although an expert shot , she ought not to shoot birds as she does . Mrs. Julia Ward Howe owns up ...
Halaman 42
... gives a " Talk on Health . " From this paper the following is characteristic : " A physi- cian once told me that when ... give or the means by which they get their pay . Women are too apt to regard their personal charms as part of their ...
... gives a " Talk on Health . " From this paper the following is characteristic : " A physi- cian once told me that when ... give or the means by which they get their pay . Women are too apt to regard their personal charms as part of their ...
Halaman 59
... give their testimony in open court . But the policy of pro- tection , as sound principles require , and many courts assert , extends as well to parties as to witnesses . In Mitchell v . Judge , 53 Mich . 541 , Cooley , C. J. , said ...
... give their testimony in open court . But the policy of pro- tection , as sound principles require , and many courts assert , extends as well to parties as to witnesses . In Mitchell v . Judge , 53 Mich . 541 , Cooley , C. J. , said ...
Halaman 62
... give a good reason why husband and wife should not be allowed to testify for or against each other , yet they live under this ban in Virginia to - day . We are too conservative . As has been well said by a great orator and lawyer ...
... give a good reason why husband and wife should not be allowed to testify for or against each other , yet they live under this ban in Virginia to - day . We are too conservative . As has been well said by a great orator and lawyer ...
Edisi yang lain - Lihat semua
Istilah dan frasa umum
affirmed agent alleged appear appellant applied authority Bank bigamy cause of action charge cited civil Civil Procedure claim Code common law Constitution contract conviction corporation counsel court of equity creditors crime criminal damages David Dudley Field death debt decision declared defendant defendant's discharge duty evidence execution executor fact fendant fraud ground habeas corpus held husband indictment injury intention judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury justice land lawyers legislative Legislature liable licensed to deal Lord mens rea ment negligence offense opinion owner party payment person plaintiff present principle prosecution punishment purpose question Railroad Railroad Co reason recover respondent rule set-off statement statute street supra Supreme Court telegraph testator testimony thing tion trial trial by jury trust United usury void wife witness words York
Bagian yang populer
Halaman 277 - There must be reasonable evidence of negligence, but where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant that the accident arose from want of care.
Halaman 158 - EACH branch of the legislature, as well as the governor and Council, shall have authority to require the opinions of the justices of the Supreme Judicial Court, upon important questions of law, and upon solemn occasions.
Halaman 234 - Every such action shall be brought by and In the names of the personal representatives of such deceased person, and the amount recovered In every such action shall be for the exclusive benefit of the widow and next of kin...
Halaman 33 - That all contracts or agreements, whether by parol or in writing, by way of gaming or wagering, shall be null and void ; and that no suit shall be brought or maintained in any Court of Law or Equity for recovering any sum of money or valuable thing alleged to be won upon any wager, or which shall have been deposited in the bands of any person to abide the event on which any wager shall have been made...
Halaman 332 - That every such action shall be for the benefit of the wife, husband, parent and child of the person whose death shall have been so caused...
Halaman 112 - That there shall be no establishment of any one religious sect in this province in preference to another ; and that no protestant inhabitant of this colony shall be denied the enjoyment of any civil right, merely on account of his religious principles...
Halaman 65 - ... as by the known usage of trade, or the like, acquired a peculiar sense, distinct from the popular sense of the same words...
Halaman 348 - No one shall be permitted to profit by his own fraud, or to take advantage of his own wrong, or to found any claim upon his own iniquity, or to acquire property by his own crime.
Halaman 227 - For it is a general principle of the highest importance to the proper administration of justice that a judicial officer, in exercising the authority vested in him, shall be free to act upon his own convictions, without apprehension of personal consequences to himself.
Halaman 266 - Suppose one believed that human sacrifices were a necessary part of religious worship, would it be seriously contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed it was her duty to burn herself upon the funeral pile of her dead husband, would it be beyond the power of the civil government to prevent her carrying her belief into practice?