TWO MAIN QUESTIONS IN CONTROVERSY BETWEEN THE CHURCHES OF ENGLAND AND ROME, STATED AND DISCUSSED, WITH REFERENCE TO DR. DOYLE'S ASSERTION OF THE PRACTICABILITY OF A RE-UNION; And in reply to the most important parts of "END OF RELIGIOUS CONTROVERSY," AND J. K. L.'s Seventh Letter on the State of Ereland. BY JAMES EDWARD JACKSON, M. A. "This little tract will give no great trouble. Instead of the particular Leslie's Case Stated. DUBLIN: RICHARD MILLIKEN, GRAFTON-STREET,! BOOKSELLER TO THE UNIVERSITY, AND CHARLES AND JOHN RIVINGTON, ST. PAUL'S CHURCH-YARD, 1825. Lately Published, REASONS for withdrawing from the HIBERNIAN BIBLE SOCIETY, founded on the Public Documents of that Institution.-By the same Author; 8vo. 3s. A VINDICATION of the "Reasons for withdrawing from the Hibernian Bible Society," in answer to charges of misrepresentation, &c. contained in an anonymous better; with a statement of the peculiar tenets of the Evangelical Divines, drawn from their own writings.By the same Author; Svo. 4s. CONTENTS. Introductory Remarks on Dr. Doyle's project for re-uniting the Churches of England and Rome.- Main points in controversy stated; viz. 1st. the PAGE CHAP. IV. 1. Romish proof of the divine authority of Tradi- tion, drawn from the mode of teaching adopted by Jesus Christ and his Apostles. .... 2. From the partial and occasional nature of the writings of the New Testament. 3. Analogical arguments, founded on the supposi- tion, that the mode of teaching adopted by Jesus Christ and his Apostles, must have been similar to that of other Legislators, and to the practice. 4. Romish argument in support of Tradition, as a Rule of Faith, drawn from the alleged fact, that 5. Alleged universality of the Romish Traditions.. 6. J. K. L.'s novel argument in support of the di- vine authority of Tradition, founded on the alle- Romish Proof of the Divine Authority of Tradition, from the testimony of the Fathers. 1. Character of the Fathers, as witnesses, and the ... |