Page

9

260

122

Bensley v. Mt. Lake Water Co., 13 Cal. 306
Bergtholdt v. Porter Bros. Co., 114 Cal. 681
Berry v. S. F. & N. R. Ry. Co., 50 Cal. 435.
Beveridge v. Lewis, 137 Cal. 619.
Bidwell v. Babcock, 87 Cal. 29, 32
Bigelow v. Ballerino, 111 Cal. 559, 563
Bills v. Silver King M. Co., 106 Cal. 9.
Bishop v. McKillican, 124 Cal. 328.
Blakeslee v. Hall, 94 Cal. 159

Blane v. Paymaster Min. Co., 95 Cal. 524.
Blanchard v. Kaull, 44 Cal. 440...
Bland v. S. P. R. R. Co., 65 Cal. 628.
Blen v. B. R. etc. Co., 20 Cal. 602
Bliss v. Kaweah etc., 65 Cal. 502.
Bliss v. K. C. & I. Co., 65 Cal. 502.
Bliss v. Sneath, 119 Cal. 530

Bloede v. Bloede, 57 Am. St. Rep. 379..
Blood v. La Serena etc. Co., 113 Cal, 221

.2, 3, 4, 7, 10, 11, 12 .33, 37, 190, 202

.2, 4

166

333

28

.251, 483

.79, 144, 158, 393

.362, 363

.134, 140, 142, 204

.137, 140, 144, 256, 261

252

.190, 193, 196, 479 .133, 176, 212, 215

.121, 135, 136, 141, 142, 143, 153, 155, 156, 252, 267, 269

Blood v. McCarthy, 112 Cal. 565
Blood v. Marcuse, 38 Cal. 590

Blood v. Woods, 95 Cal. 78

Bloss v. Lewis, 109 Cal. 493

.389, 393, 563, 570

.138, 140, 256

.386, 389, 556, 560, 563, 570

Boggs v. Lakeport etc. Assn., 111 Cal. 354
Bonney v. Tilley, 109 Cal. 346
Borland v. Nevada Bank, 99 Cal. 89, 92.
Boston Tun. Co. v. McKenzie, 67 Cal. 485.
Bowers v. Modoc etc. Land Co., 117 Cal. 52.
Bowie v. Grand Lodge S. W., 99 Cal. 392
Boyd v. Heron, 125 Cal. 45...
Boyd v. So. Cal. Ry. Co., 126 Cal. 573
Bracia v. Nelson, 42 Cal. 107

15 .156, 291 153

.35, 190, 194, 195 .113, 116, 118, 294

50 .287, 288 .281, 283, 334, 335, 384, 385, 479

..359, 360 255

Brittan v. Oakland Bank of Savings, 124 Cal. 291.
Brooks v. Hyde, 37 Cal. 379 ...

216

.87, 102

422

28

Brown v. Board of Education etc., 103 Cal. 531......251, 257, 269

53

266

.120, 121

Bulwer C. M. Co. v. Standard etc. Co., 83 Cal. 613.

Bunker v. Osborn, 132 Cal. 480
Burbank v. Dennis, 101 Cal. 90
Burke v. Badlam, 57 Cal. 594.

.60, 63, 64, 165, 421, 423, 599

.252, 261

4

Burnett v. Lyford, 93 Cal. 114.
Burnett v. Sacramento, 12 Cal. 76
Burnham v. S. F. Fuse Mfg. Co., 76 Cal. 26..237, 240, 241, 290, 292
Burns v. Sennett, 99 Cal. 372

Butte Co. v. Boydston, 64 Cal. 113

Byrum v. Stockton etc. Works, 91 Cal. 657....

146

.359, 360

51

.......

.124, 206, 209,

.125, 126

Cal. etc. Co. v. Callender, 94 Cal. 120
Cal. etc. Co. v. Hooper, 76 Cal. 405.
Cal. etc. Hotel v. Russell, 88 Cal. 277..
Cal. etc. R. R. v. S. P. R. R., 65 Cal. 394, 409, 67 Cal. 59..

Cal. Nat. Bank v. Ginty, 108 Cal. 148.

.50, 52, 91, 103, 104, 350, 855

680

.10, 11, 341

.8, 341, 344

10

Cal. P. R. R. Co. v. Armstrong, 46 Cal. 85, 91..
Cal. P. R. R. Co. v. C. P. R. R. Co., 47 Cal. 528.
Cal. S. R. R. Co. v. Kimball, 61 Cal. 90
Cal. St. Tel. Co. v. Alta T. Co., 22 Cal. 398.28, 30, 254, 258, 284, 574, 816
Cal. S. & L. Soc. v. Harris, 111 Cal. 133..
Cal. Steam Wat. Co. v. Wright, & Cal. 590.
Cal. Sugar Co. v. Schafer, 57 Cal. 396....
Caldwell v. Sacramento Co., 79 Cal. 348.
Calkins v. Equitable B. & L. Assn., 126 Cal. 531.
California etc. Hotel Co. v. Callender, 84 Cal. 120.

.111, 116, 117, 118 877 .125, 226, 227, 239, 240

California etc. R. R. Co. v. McCartney, 104 Cal. 616.

Callahan v. Dunn, 78 Cal. 370

Carson etc. Bank v. Elevator Co., 30 Am. St. Rep. 458.

342

228

.5, 855

Cashman v. Root, 89 Cal. 372, 373, 382

Case Plow Works v. Montgomery, 115 Cal. 380.

.265, 389

.37, 190, 196, 202

Cavanaugh v. Casselman, 88 Cal. 550..

Central Irr. Dist. v. De Lappe, 79 Cal. 351.

.18, 19 553

.6, 82, 83

Page

341, 855 341

Central Pac. R. R. Co. v. Bd. Equalization, 60 Cal. 35....61, 66, 67, 68
Central Pac. R. R. Co. v. Frisbie, 41 Cal. 356....
Central Pac. R. R. Co. v. Pearson, 35 Cal. 247
Central Pac. R. R. Co. v. People St. of Nevada, 162 U. S. 91.
Ceeder v. Lumber Co., 24 Am. St. Rep. 137. .
Chamberlain v. Pacific Wool Growing Co., 54 Cal. 103.

Chapman v. Doray, 89 Cal. 52, 54

62

136

.134, 135, 142, 154 .101, 103, 148, 186, 187, 765

.49, 51

Chase v. S. P. R. R. Co., 83 Cal. 468
Chatter v. San Francisco Sugar Co., 19 Cal. 219.79, 123, 124, 212, 282
Chemical Nat. Bank v. Havermale, 120 Cal. 601... .578, 679, 680
Chetwood v. Cal. Nat. Bank, 113 Cal. 414.. .39, 248, 249, 491, 680
Chollar M. Co. v. Wilson, 66 Cal. 374

Christian etc. Assn. v. Walton, 59 Am. St. Rep. 640.

.147, 172, 247

122

88

262

Christie v. Sherwood, 113 Cal. 531

Christy v. Dana, 42 Cal. 17

Chico Bridge Co. v. Sacramento Tr. Co., 123 Cal. 180..557, 558, 577

City and Co. of S. F. v. Flood, 64 Cal. 504.

City and Co. of S. F. v. Fry, 63 Cal. 470..

City of Los Angeles v. Leavis, 119 Cal. 165.

City of Los A. v. Pomeroy, 124 Cal. 597

City of Santa Ana v. Harlin, 99 Cal. 538.

City of Santa Cruz v. Enright, 95 Cal. 105, 111..

City of San Pedro v. S. P. R. R. Co., 101 Cal. 333.

Clarke v. San Francisco, 53 Cal. 306..

Clute v. Loveland, 68 Cal. 254

Coburn v. Ames, 57 Cal. 204

588

589

.3, 4

6, 10

.5, 12

.3, 6

495

301

79

584

8

15

Coburn v. Goodall, 72 Cal. 505.
Cody v. Murphy, 89 Cal. 522
Cogswell v. Bull, 39 Cal. 320

Cohn v. C. P. R. R. Co., 71 Cal. 488..
Coite v. Society for Savings, 32 Conn. 173.
Coleman v. Bd. of Supervisors, 50 Cal. 493.
Coleman v. San Rafael etc. Co., 49 Cal. 517.
Colton etc. Co. v. Schwartz, 99 Cal. 284..
Colton L. & W. Co. v. Schmitz, 99 Cal. 285.
Colton v. Rossi, 9 Cal. 595, 599

....

.39, 169, 248, 249 .49, 50, 52, 104

Columbia Screw Co. v. Warner Lock Co., 138 Cal. 447.
Colusa v. Glenn, 124 Cal. 498, 117 Cal. 440..

412

22 284

252

.475, 476

.9, 10

.484, 485

Consolidated Channel Co. v. C. P. R. R. Co., 51 Cal. 269......6, 7 Contra Costa Water Co. v. Breed, 139 Cal. 432...

.71, 73, 75

Page

Contra Costa Water Co. v. Moss, 23 Cal. 323

..4, 6, 204, 341, 346, 356, 855

Copsey v. Sacramento Bank, 133 Cal. 659
Corning v. McCullough, 49 Am. Dec. 309
Cottle v. Spitzer, 65 Cal. 460......

County of San Mateo v. Coburn, 130 Cal. 631.
Courtois v. Grand Lodge etc., 135 Cal. 552.
Cox v. Los Angeles Terminal Ry., 109 Cal. 104.
Craig v. Hesperia etc., 113 Cal. 7, 13......
...212, 215,
Crall v. Poso Irr. Dist., 87 Cal. 140

Crane v. Pacific Bank, 106 Cal. 72
Creditors v. Consumers, 98 Cal. 319.

Crescent City etc. Co. v. Simpson, 77 Cal. 286.
Crosby v. Lyon, 37 Cal. 242

Cross v. Eureka etc. Co., 73 Cal. 306
Cross v. Pinckneyville M. Co., 17 Ill. 54.

153

198

593

.2, 5

779

..363, 364

220, 221, 226 6

.413, 672, 677, 939

.103, 104

.252, 261

63

218

112

.70, 72, 404, 405 .138, 140, 253, 260, 261

Crow v. San Joaquin etc. Irr. Co., 130 Cal. 309..
Crowley v. Genessee M. Co., 55 Cal. 273.
Culbertson v. Kinevan, 73 Cal. 68

Curran v. Shattock, 24 Cal. 427

.388, 867

9

Curtin v. G. M. & D. Co., 130 Cal. 345....133, 150, 155, 163, 183, 184
Curtin v. Salmon River etc. Co., 130 Cal. 351..
Cutting etc. Co. v. Packers' Ex., 86 Cal. 579.
Curtiss v. Murray, 26 Cal. 633.

Davis v. San Lorenzo R. R. Co., 47 Cal. 517, 519....8, 343, 344, 855

Dean v. Davis, 51 Cal. 406

.79, 80, 81, 82

Dean v. Gray Bros. etc. Co., 109 Cal. 433.

De Baker v. Railway Co., 106 Cal. 257..

Dennis v. Superior Court, 91 Cal. 548
Denman v. Broderick, 111 Cal. 96
Denny v. Schram, 36 Am. St. Rep. 141
Derby v. Stevens, 64 Cal. 287
Desmond v. Dunn, 55 Cal. 242..

De Silva v. Supreme Council, 109 Cal. 373
De Witt v. San Francisco, 2 Cal. 289.....
Dingley v. McDonald, 124 Cal. 90, 94...
Doljanin v. Austrian Ben. Soc., 137 Cal. 165.
Donohoe-Kelly B. Co. v. S. P. Co., 138 Cal. 183

Dulin v. Pacific W. & C. Co., 103 Cal. 357.133, 147, 161, 162, 163, 174

Dunbar v. Alcalde etc., 1 Cal. 355

245

Eachus v. Los Angeles, 130 Cal. 495...

2

Eachus v. Los Angeles etc. Ry. Co., 103 Cal. 614..

Eel River etc. R. R. Co. v. Field, 67 Cal. 432..339, 340, 342, 343, 344

Enright v. S. F. & S. J. R. R. Co., 39 Cal. 230, 33 Cal. 234..359, 855

Esrey v. S. P. Co., 88 Cal. 406..
Estate of Eastman, 60 Cal. 308
Estate of Fair, 128 Cal. 607..
Estate of Gay, 138 Cal. 557.
Estate of Pichoir, 128 Cal. 615
Estate of Winchester, 133 Cal. 271

362 .97, 98, 438, 816

.60, 64, 66, 67, 594, 595, 596

448 .595, 596 705

Eureka etc. Co. v. Superior Court, 66 Cal. 311.

.251, 252, 481, 482, 483, 485, 486

Eureka Mer. Co. v. Cal. Ins. Co., 130 Cal. 153..
Evans v. Bailey, 66 Cal. 112

Ewing v. Oroville M. Co., 56 Cal. 654

483

.99, 257, 268, 293

.44, 45, 281

Excelsior M. & M. Co. v. Pierce, 90 Cal. 135.165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 228

Ex-Mission K. & W. Co. v. Flash, 97 Cal. 610..

.120, 121, 172

.447, 924

383

.14, 15 15

Ex parte Clark, 126 Cal. 235

Ex parte Frazer, 34 Cal. 94, 95, 96

292

.28, 29, 30