 It certainly appears to their lordships that the principle must be, when reasonableness comes in question, not what profit it may be reasonable for a company to make, but what it is reasonable to charge to the person who is charged. That is the only thing...  Stone & Webster Journal - Halaman 201918Tampilan utuh - Tentang buku ini
 | 1902 - 988 halaman
...(LR 8 App. Cas. 723, 731) Lord Chancellor Selborne thus expressed the decision of the House of Lords: ending to show the existence of competition of that...character, caused by river transportation of coal from to the person who is charged. That is the only thing he is concerned with. They do not say that the... | |
 | Christopher Robinson - 1884 - 462 halaman
...terms on which it may be used by railway trains. As to the reasonableness of charges, the principle is not what profit it may be reasonable for a company to make, but what it is reasonable to charge to the person who is charged. Cantuta Southern Railway Co. v. International Bridye Co., S App. Cas.... | |
 | John Mews - 1884 - 1242 halaman
...terms on which it may be used by railway trains. As to the reasonableness of charges, the principle is not what profit it may be reasonable for a company to make, but what it is reasonable to charge to the person who is charged. Canada Southern Railway Company v. International Bridge Company, 8 App.... | |
 | Alfred Charles Richard Emden - 1884 - 330 halaman
...terms on which it may be used by railway trains. As to the reasonableness of charges, the principle is not what profit it may be reasonable for a company to make, lut what it is reasonable to charge to the per; on who is charged. CANADA COLONIAL LAW— continued... | |
 | 1903 - 1164 halaman
...International Bridge Co., 8 App. Cas. 723, was cited with approval to the point that the question is not what profit it may be reasonable for a company to make, but what it is reasonable to charge to the person who is charged. And Mr. Justice Brewer adds: "The question Is, always, not what does... | |
 | Jean Joseph Beauchamp, Great Britain. Privy Council - 1891 - 946 halaman
...KAILWAY COMPANY v. INTERNATIONAL BRIDGE COMPANY ' 133. " Reasonable charge " must be understood to mean not what profit it may be reasonable for a company to make, but what it is reasonable to charge to the person who has to pay, whatever may be the benefit of the person imposing the charge. ATTORNEY... | |
 | New York (State). Supreme Court. Appellate Division - 1921 - 1088 halaman
...723.) In the Cotting case Mr. Justice BREWER quotes from the English case (supra, 96), as follows: " It certainly appears to their Lordships that the principle...company to make, but what it is reasonable to charge to the person who is charged." Prescribing a general rate for service is a legislative and not a judicial... | |
 | Great Britain. Courts - 1896 - 264 halaman
...their Lordships " (says Lord Selborne in delivering the opinion of the Privy Council in that case) "that the principle must be when reasonableness comes...company to make, but what it is reasonable to charge to the person who is charged, .... It would be a very extraordinary thing indeed, unless the Legislature... | |
 | 1899 - 820 halaman
...reasonable, viewed in that light, they could stand, though the company obtained fabulous returns. " It certainly appears to their Lordships that the principle...company to make, but what it is reasonable to charge to the person who is charged." ( P. 371. ) ness." ' Or, as this part of the decision is explained by... | |
 | 1899 - 818 halaman
...reasonable, viewed in that light, they could stand, though the company obtained fabulous returns. " It certainly appears to their Lordships that the principle...company to make, but what it is reasonable to charge to the person who is charged." (P. 371.) ness." 1 Or, as this part of the decision is explained by... | |
| |
