Clark, F. W., General Freight Agent of Seaboard Air Line, in the Matter of the Application of Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Com- East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad Company et al., Little Rock & Memphis Railroad Compa- 225 Georgia Railroad Company, William H. Heard v. Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada, Investiga- tion of the Acts and Doings of in the Transporta- tion of Traffic from the United States into Canada. 89 Greene, Thomas L. v. New York Central & Hudson River Harris, James A. v. H. R. Duval, Receiver etc. Illinois Central Railroad Company, Charles Elvey v. In the matter of the Investigation of the Acts and Doings of the Grand Trunk Railway Company in the In the matter of Rice, Robinson & Witherop v. Western New York & Pennsylvania Railroad Company. Leggett, Francis H. & Co. v. New York Central & Hud- son River Railroad Company et al. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, George Rice v. 186 Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Company, Mattingly, Bennet D. v. Pennsylvania Company Myers, Milton L., Survivor, etc. v. Pennsylvania Com- New Orleans Cotton Exchange v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company et al. . 534 New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company et al., F. B. Thurber et al. v.; Thomas L. Greene v.; New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company et al., New York Produce Exchange v. New York Produce Exchange v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company et al. Northern Pacific Railroad Company, Oregon Short Line Pankey, J. B. v. Richmond & Danville Railroad Com- 658 pany et al. Pennsylvania Company, Bennet D. Mattingly v. . 592 Pennsylvania Company et al., Milton L. Myers, Survivor Pennsylvania Company v. Louisville, New Albany & Chi- 223 cago Railway Company Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Worcester Excursion Car Company v. . 577 Rice, Robinson & Witherop v. Western New York & Pennsylvania Railroad Company In re. 87 Richmond & Danville Railroad Company et al., J. B. PAGE. 658 Sanger, Major J. P. v. Southern Pacific Company et al. 134 Sidman, George D. v. Richmond & Danville Railroad Company 512 Southern Pacific Company et al., Major J. P. Sanger v. 134 Stone & Carten v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Company Subpoenas duces tecum, in the matter of the application of Petitioner for 613 186 Tariffs and Classifications of the Atlanta & West Point Third Annual Report of the Interstate Commerce Com- Thurber, F. B. et al. . New York Central & Hudson 19 289 473 Union Pacific Railway Company et al., Lincoln Board of Western New York & Pennsylvania Railroad Company 221 White, Frederick A. v. Michigan Central Railroad Company et al. 87 281 Worcester Excursion Car Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad . 577 TABLE OF CASES CITED. PAGE. . 34, 38 Boston & Albany Railroad Company v. Boston & Low- 183 604 557, 560 84, 557, 559 Burton Stock Car Company v. Chicago, Burlington & 140, . 582, 586 California v. Pacific Railroad Company, 127 U. S. 1, 604 Chicago & Alton Railroad Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 1 I. C. C. R. 86, I. C. C. R. 231, Coe v. Errol, 116 U. S. 517, Crews v. Richmond & Danville Railroad Company, 1 I. Detroit Board of Trade v. Grand Trunk Railway et al., 2 I. C. C. R. 315, 321, 325, Evans & Reed v. Oregon Railway & Navigation Company, 1 I. C. C. R. 336, 5, 18 70 . 518 |