 | Dean Jaensch, David Scott Mathieson - 1998 - 262 halaman
...ignored. This will be made clear below. Sartori establishes two criteria of relevance (1976: 22-3): Rule 1 A minor party can be discounted as irrelevant...least one of the possible governmental majorities. Rule 2 A party qualifies for relevance whenever its existence, or appearance, affects the tactics of... | |
 | John Löwenhardt - 1998 - 284 halaman
...by applying two counting rules. The first determines a party's 'government or coalition potential': a 'minor party can be discounted as irrelevant whenever...or put to use for any feasible coalition majority.' The second defines relevance in terms of a party's ability to 'blackmail' other parties and alter their... | |
 | Michael Holländer - 2003 - 561 halaman
...Sartori betont zusätzlich das Erpressungspotential und betrachtet eine Partei als unbedeutend, wenn „it is never needed or put to use for any feasible coalition majority" (Niedermayer 1996:22). Für Sartoris Typologisierung von Parteiensystemen macht diese sehr strenge... | |
 | Jóhanna Kristín Birnir - 2006 - 213 halaman
...least consider the composition of the legislature when appointing the cabinet. Therefore, versely, a minor party must be counted, no matter how small...time, and at some point in time, at least one of the governmental majorities" (p. 122). Sartori goes on to argue that "a party qualifies for relevance whenever... | |
 | Oskar Niedermayer - 2007 - 228 halaman
...,Erpressungspotenzial' besitzen3. Danach kann eine Partei dann als irrelevant angesehen werden, wenn „it is never needed or put to use for any feasible coalition majority". Unabhängig von ihrem Koalitionspotential, muss eine Partei jedoch immer dann mitgezählt werden, wenn... | |
| |
... it is never needed or put to use for any feasible coalition majority. Conversely, a minor party has to be counted, no matter how small, if it finds itself in a position to determine over time at least one of the possible governmental majorities. 