264

Land Co., Cal. & Ore., VS.
Worden. See Cal. & Ore.
Land Co. vs. Worden.
Lane, Ex parte. U. S. Dist.
Ct. Mich. 1881; 6 Fed. Rep.
34, BROWN, J., Vol. II,
Lane vs. Oregon. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1868; 7 Wallace, 71,
CHASE, Ch. J., Vol. II,
264, 536, 542
Langdeau vs. Hanes. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1874; 21 Wallace, 521
FIELD, J., Vol. II, 194
La Ninfa, The. U. S. Dist.

Ct. Alaska, 1891; 49 Fed.
Rep. 575, BUGBEE, J., and
U. S. Cir. Ct. App. 9th Cir.
1896; 75 Fed. Rep. 513, HAW-
LEY, J., Vol. II,
La Republic Francaise VS.
Schultz. See Republic Fran-
caise vs. Schultz.

38, 83

See

Laverty, United States vs.
United States vs. Laverty.
Lavery, Buffalo R. & P. R. R.
Co. vs. See Buffalo R. & P.
R. R. Co. vs. Lavery.
Law vs. Thorndike. Sup. Ct.
Mass. 1838; 20 Pickering, (37
Mass.) 317, SHAW, Ch. J.,
Vol. II,
297
Lawrence, United States vs.
See United States vs. Law-
rence.

Lawson, Bachman vs. See

Bachman vs. Lawson. Lawton vs. Steele. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1894; 152 U. S. 133, BROWN, J., Vol. II, 314, 318, 319 Leathers, United States VS. See United States vs. Leathers.

548

Lark and Cargo, The. U. S.
Cir. Ct. Mass. 1812; 1 Gal-
lison, 55, STORY, J., Vol. I,
Lascelles vs. Bidwell. U. S.
Cir. Ct. S. D. N. Y. 1900; 102
Fed. Rep. 1004, LACOMBE, J.,
Vol. I,
121, 545, 547
Lascelles vs. Georgia. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1893; 148 U. S. 537,
JACKSON, J., Vol. II,
Lattimer vs. Poteet. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1840; 14 Peters, 4,
MCLEAN, J., Vol. II, 214, 349

404

Lee.

297

Legal Tender Cases. Cited collectively, Vol. I, 536, 549, 551 Legal Tender Cases. See Hepburn vs. Griswold. Juilliard vs. Greenman. Knox vs. Lee.

220

Leghorn Seizures, The. U.
S. Ct. of Claims, 1892; 27 Ct.
of Clms. 224, NOTT, J.,
Vol. II,
Leighton vs. United States.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1894; 161 U.
S. 291, BREWER, J., affirming
U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1894; 29
Ct. of Clms. 288, PEELLE, J.,
Vol. II,
Leitensdorfer vs. Webb. U.S.
Sup. Ct. 1857; 20 Howard,
176, DANIEL, J., Vol. I,

Vol. II,

284

223

538 539, 545, 551, 554

Le Louis, The. High Ct. Admr. 1817; 2 Dodson Admr. 210, SIR WILLIAM SCOTT, Vol. II,

161

329

118

Lem Hing Dun vs. United
States. U. S. Cir. Ct. App.
9 Cir. 1892; 7 U. S. App. 31,
HANDFORD, J., (also Gee
Fook Sing vs. United States.
7 U. S. App. 27) Vol. II,
Lem Moon Sing vs. United
States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1895;
158 U. S. 538, HARLAN, J.,
Vol. I,
28, 479, 555
Vol. II,
107, 109, 110, 259
Leon XIII, The. Ct. of Ap-
peal (English) 1883; 8 Pro-
bate Div. 121, BRETT, M. R.
Vol. II,
Leonard vs. Nye. Sup. Ct.
Mass. 1878; 125 Mass. 455,
GRAY, Ch. J., Vol. II, 292, 297
Leong Yick Dew, In re. U.
S. Cir. Ct. Cala. 1884; 10
Sawyer, 38, SAWYER, J.,
Vol. II,

Lessee of Coxe, McIlvaine vs.
See McIlvaine VS. Coxe's
Lessee.

Lessee of Dawson, Godfrey vs.
See Dawson's Lessee vs. God-
frey.
Lessee of Norwood, Owings vs.
See Owings vs.
Norwood's
Lessee.
Lessee of Pollard vs. Files.
See Pollard's Lessee vs. Files.
Lessee of Winton, Cornet vs.
See Cornet vs. Winton's Les-

see.

Lewis vs. Bell. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1854; 17 Howard, 616,
GRIER, J., Vol. II,
Lewis vs. Hawaii &c. Sup.
Ct. Hawaii, 1899; 12 Hawaii,

330

116

297

27, FREAR, J., Vol. I, Lewis, Missouri vs. Missouri

vs. Lewis.

Lew Jim vs. United States.

U. S. Cir. Ct. App. 9th Cir. 1895; 29 U. S. App. 513, McKENNA, J., Vol. II,

119

Libby vs. Clark. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1886; 118 U. S. 250, MIL-
LER, J., Vol. II,
License Cases. U. S. Sup. Ct.
1847; sub nomine, Thurlow
vs. Massachusetts (p. 504),
Fletcher vs. Rhode Island
(p. 540) and Pierce vs. New
Hampshire (p. 554), 5 How.
504-633, TANEY, Ch. J., Mc-
LEAN, CATRON, DANIEL,
WOODBURY, GRIER, JJ.,
Vol. II,
License Tax Cases, The. U.
S. Sup. Ct. 1866; 5 Wallace,
462, CHASE, Ch. J., Vol. I,
Life Ins. Co., Nor. West, Shep-
ard vs. See Shepard vs. Nor.
West Life Ins. Co.
Light, The Ambrose vs.
Ambrose Light, The.
Litchfield vs. United States.
U. S. Ct. of Clms. 1898; 33
Ct. of Clms. 203, PEELLE, J.,
Vol. II,
Lithographic Co. vs. Sarony.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1884; 111 Ŭ.
S. 53, MILLER, J., Vol. I,
Liverpool Hero, The. U. S.
Cir. Ct. Mass. 1814; 2 GAL-
LISON, 184, STORY, J., Vol. I, 551
Liverpool &c. Steamship
Co. vs. Phoenix Ins. Co.
U. S. Sup. Ct., 1889; 129 U.
S. 397, GRAY, J., Vol. II, 189
Livingston vs. Moore. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1833; 7 Peters, 469,
JOHNSON, J., Vol. I, 536, 542
Livingston, Steamboat Co. vs.
See Steamboat Co. vs. Liv-
ingston.

Lord Baltimore, Penn vs.

See

116

278

Penn vs. Lord Baltimore. Lord Bishop of Natal. Privy Council, 1864; 3 Moore Priv. Coun. N. S. 115, WESTBURY, Ld. Chan., Vol. I, 62, 554, 555 Loughborough vs. Blake. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1820; 5 Wheaton, 317, MARSHALL, Ch. J., Vol, I, 466, 492, 539, 540, 546, 548 Louis, The Le. See Le Louis, The

Louisiana B'd of Health, Mor

gan S. S. Co. vs. See Morgan S. S. Co. vs. Louisiana, &c. Louisiana, Kennard vs. See Kennard vs. Louisiana. Louisiana, New Hampshire vs. See New Hampshire vs. Louisiana.

Louisiana, New York vs. Same
as New Hampshire vs. Louis-
iana.

Louisiana, State Board of
Health, Compagnie Francaise
VS. See Compagnie Fran-
caise VS. State Board of
Health.

Louisiana, State of, Frederick

son vs. See Frederickson vs. State of Louisiana. Louisiana, State of, Poydras vs. See State of Louisiana vs. Poydras, and also Poydras vs. Treasurer of Louisiana. Love vs. Pamplin. U. S. Cir. Ct. Tenn. 1884; 21 Fed. Rep. 755, MATTHEWS, J., Vol. II,

36, 213

Love vs. United States. U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1894; 29 Ct. of Clms., 332, NOTT, J., Vol. II, 223, 224 Lowe, Ft. Leavenworth R. R. Co. vs. See Fort Leavenworth R. R. Co. vs. Lowe. Lowry vs. Weaver. U.S. Cir. Ct. Indiana, 1846; 4 McLean, 82, Vol. II, Lucas vs. United States. U.

35, 213

Vol. II, Lynch vs. Clark. N. Y. Ct. of Chancery, 1844; 1 Sandford's Ch. 583, SANDFORD, Vice. Chan., Vol. I, Lynde, United States vs. See United States vs. Lynde. Lyng vs. Michigan. U. S. Sup.

361

557

582

545

Ct. 1890; 135 U. S. 161, FUL-
LER, Ch. J., Vol. I,
Lynham, Hauenstein vs. See
Hauenstein vs. Lynham.
Lyon, United States ex rel. vs.
Huckabee. See United States
ex rel. Lyon vs. Huckabee.
Lyons vs. Woods. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1894; 153 U. S. 649, FUL-
LER, Ch. J., Vol. I,
MacDonnell, In re. U. S. Cir.
Ct. S. D. N. Y. 1873; 11
Blatchford, 79 and 170; Fed.
Cas. Nos. 8771 and 8772,
WOODRUFF, J., Vol. II, 264 265
McAllister vs. United States.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1891; 141 U.
S. 174, HARLAN, J., Vol. I, 130
539, 545
McBratney, United States vs.
See United States vs. Mc-
Bratney.

McCabe, Ex parte. U. S. Dist.
Ct. Texas, 1891; 46 Fed. Rep.
363, MAXEY, J., Vol. II,
McCall vs. California. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1890; 136 U. S. 104,
LAMAR, J., Vol. I,
McClung, Meigs vs.
vs. McClung.

264

546

See Meigs

McCready vs. Virginia. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1876; 94 U. S. 391,

Page

WAITE, Ch. J., Vol. II, 318, 320
McCulloch vs. Maryland. U.
S. Sup. Ct. 1819; 4 Wheaton,
316, MARSHALL, Ch. J., Vol.
I,
246, 536, 541, 542
McDaniel vs. McMeekin. Ct.
of App. So. Car. 1834; 2
Hill (Part I) S. C. Law. 1,
O'NEIL, JOHNSON, HARPER,
JJ., Vol. I,
McDonald,

Phelps vs. See
Phelps vs. McDonald.
McDonough, Keene vs. See
Keene vs. McDonough.
McDowell, Grisar vs. See Gri-
sar vs. Mc Dowell.
McFadden, Exchange (Schoon-
er) vs. See Exchange vs. Mc-
Fadden.

McGlinn, Chicago, Rock Isld.
& Pac. R. R. Co. vs. See
Chicago, &c., R. R. Co. vs.
McGlinn.
McGregor vs. Comstock. N.
Y. Sup. Ct. 1853; 16 Barbour,
427, EDWARDS, J., Vol. II,
McIlvaine vs. Coxe's Lessee.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1805; 2 Cranch,
280; same case, 1808; 4
Cranch, 208, CUSHING, J.,
Vol. II,

536

180

169

McIntosh, Johnson vs. See Johnson vs. McIntosh. McKay vs. Campbell. U. S. Dist. Ct. Oregon, 1871; 2 Sawyer, 118, DEADY, J., Vol. I, 538 554, 556, 557, 559 168, 232

56

Vol. II, McKibben, Davidson vs. See Davidson vs. McKibben. McKinney vs. Saviego. U.S. Sup. Ct. 1855; 18 Howard, 235, CAMPBELL, J., Vol. II, 169, 179 McLeod, People (N. Y.), vs. See People (N. Y.) vs. McLeod. McMahon, Benson VS. See Benson vs. McMahon. McMaster, Jones vs. See Jones vs. McMaster. McMeekin, McDaniel vs. See McDaniel vs. McMeekin. McNeil, Ex parte. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1871; 13 Wallace, 236, SWAYNE, J., Vol. I, McPherson vs. Blacker. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1892; 146 U. S. 1, FULLER, Ch. J., Vol. I, 536, 541 544 361

Vol. II,

542

Page

McPhun, In re. U. S. Cir.
Ct. S. D. N. Y. 1887; 30 Fed.
Rep. 57, BROWN, J., Vol. II, 265
Mackey vs. Coxe. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1855; 18 Howard, 100,
MCLEAN, J., Vol. II,
Madison, Marbury vs. See Mar-
bury vs. Madison.

Mafia Riot Cases. See New
Orleans vs. Abbagnato.
Magee, Jecker vs. See Haver
vs. Yaker.

Mager vs. Grima. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1850; 8 Howard, 490,
TANEY, Ch. J., Vol. II,
Magone, North German Lloyd
S. S. Co. vs. See Nor. Ger.
&c. vs. Magone.

221

52

266

46

Mahon vs. Justice. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1888; 127 U. S. 700,
FIELD, J., Vol. II,
Mahoney vs. United States.
U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1867; 3
Ct. of Claims, 152, NoтT, J.,
Vol. II,
335
Maiden vs. Ingersoll. Sup.
Ct. Michigan, 1859; 6 Mich.
373, CAMPBELL, J., Vol. II,
Maine, State of vs. Newell.
See State of Maine vs. New-
ell.
Maish vs. Arizona. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1896; 164 U. S. 599,
BREWER, J., Vol. II,
Manchester VS. Massachu-
setts. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1891;
139 U. S. 240, BLATCHFORD,
J., Vol. II,
315, 319
Mann vs. Wilson. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1859; 23 Howard, 457,
CATRON, J., Vol. II,
Mann and Ross, Iowa vs. See
Iowa vs. Ross and Mann.
Marbury vs. Madison. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1803; 1 Cranch, 137,
MARSHALL, Ch. J., Vol. I,

194

217

62

536, 541, 544, 545, 556, 584
361

Vol. II,
Marie, The. U. S. Dist. Ct.

Oregon, 1892; 49 Fed. Rep.
286, DEADY, J., Vol. II, 333
Mares vs. United States. U.
S. Ct. of Claims, 1894; 29
Ct. of Claims, 197, WELDON,
J., Vol. II,

Marriott, Oldfield vs. See Old-
field vs. Marriott.
Marsh vs. Brooks. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1850; 8 Howard, 223,
CATRON, J., Vol. II,

223

207

Maryland, Brown vs. See Brown vs. Maryland. Maryland, McCulloch vs. See McCulloch vs. Maryland. Maryland, Smith vs. See Smith vs. State of Maryland. Massachusetts, Commonwealth of, vs. Sheafe. See Commonwealth vs. Sheafe. Massachusetts, Manchester vs. See Manchester vs. Massachusetts.

Massachusetts, Rhode Island vs.
See Rhode Island vs. Massa-
chusetts.

Massachusetts, Thurlow vs. See
License Cases.

Mattingly vs. Dist. of Colum

bia. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1878; 97 U. S. 987, STRONG, J., Vol. I, 540 Maurice, United States vs. See United States vs. Maurice. Maxwell vs. Dow. U. S. Sup.

Ct. 1900; 176 U. S. 581, PECKHAM, J., Vol. I, 62, 542, 549, 556 May vs. New Orleans. U. S.

Sup. Ct. 1900: 178 U. S. 496,
HARLAN, J., Vol. I,

542, 546

Mayer vs. White. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1860; 24 Howard, 317, NELSON, J., Vol. II,

297

229

See Duryee vs. Mayor of New
York.

Mayor of New York, Hender-
son vs. See Henderson vs.
Mayor of New York.
Mayor, The, Sharpless vs. See
Sharpless vs. The Mayor.
Meade vs. United States. U.
S. Sup. Ct. 1869, 9 Wallace,
691, CLIFFORD, J., affirming
in part same case, 1866; 2 Ct.
of Claims, 224, CASEY, Ch. J.,
Vol. II,
146, 310
Mechanic's Bank vs. Union
Bank. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1874;
22 Wallace, 276, STRONG, J.,
Vol. I,

Meehan, Jones vs. See Jones

App. 8th Cir. 1893; 12 U. S. App. 305, CALDWELL, J., Vol. II,

551

221

44

Meier vs. Lee. Sup. Ct. Iowa, 1898; 106 Iowa, 303, GIVEN, J., Vol. II, Meigs vs. McClung. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1815; 9 Cranch, 11, MARSHALL, Ch. J., Vol. II, 217 603

Mein, Higginson vs. See Higginson vs. Mein.

Meredith vs. United States.

U. S. Sup. Ct. 1839; 13 Peters, 486, STORY, J., Vol. I, 571 Merritt, Hilton vs. See Hilton vs. Merritt.

Merryman vs. Bourne. U. S.

Sup. Ct. 1869; 9 Wallace, 592, SWAYNE, J.. Vol. II, 152, 184 Mesa vs. United States. U. S.

184

540

Sup. Ct. 1862; 2 Black, 721, PER CURIAM, Vol. II, Metropolitan R. R. vs. Dist. of Columbia. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1889; 132 U. S. 1, BRADLEY, J., Vol. I, Metz, Milnor vs. See Milnor vs. Metz. Metzger, In re (also reported as Metzgar, In re). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1847; 5 Howard, 176, MCLEAN, J.; same case below, U. S. Dist. Ct. S. D. N. Y. 1847; Fed. Cas. 9511, BETTS, J. See also N. Y. Sup. Ct. 1847; 1 Barbour, 248, EDMONDS, J., Vol. II, 63, 79 81, 105, 128, 259, 324