Peaslee, Stairs ve. See Stairs vs. Peaslee.

Peck vs. Miami County Com

missioners. U. S. Cir. Ct.
Kansas, 1876; 4 Dillon, 371,
Fed. Cas. 10891, DILLON, J.,
Vol. II,

Peck, Fletcher vs. See Fletcher vs. Peck.

Peck, Steinaman VS. See Steinaman vs. Peck. Pederson, In re. U. S. Dist. Ct. S. D. N. Y. 1851; Fed. Cas. 10899a, BETTS, J., Vol. II,

Peggy, The Schooner,

United

Page

214

266

States vs. See United States
vs. Schooner Peggy.
Pena, United States vs. See
United States vs. Pena.
Penhallow vs. Doane. U.S.
Sup. Ct. 1795; 3 Dallas, 54,
PATTERSON, BLAIR, CUSH-
ING, JJ., Vol. I, 238, 246, 536, 543
Penn VS. Lord Baltimore.

High Ct. of Chancery, 1750;
1 Vesey Sen. 445, HARD-
WICKE, Ld. Chan., Vol. I, 554

557 166, 295

Vol. II, Pennock VS. Franklin Co. Commissioners. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1880; 103 U. S. 44, FIELD, J., Vol. II, Pennsylvania vs. Wheeling Bridge Co. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1855; 18 Howard, 421-460, NELSON, J., Vol. I, Pennsylvania, Bell's Gap R. R. Co. vs. See Bell's Gap R. R. Co. vs. Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania, Phila. & Southern S. S. Co. vs. See Phila. & Southern S. S. Co. ys. Pennsylvania.

214

546

50

Pennsylvania, Prigg vs. See Prigg vs. Pennsylvania. People vs. Compagnie Generale &c. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1882; 107 U. S. 59, MILLER, J., Vol. II, People (Cala.) VS. Gerke. Sup. Ct. Cala. 1855; 5 Cala. 381, HEYDENFELT and BRYAN, JJ., Vol. II, 42, 59, 60 People (Cala.) vs. Naglee. Sup. Ct. Cala. 1850; 1 Cala. 232, BENNETT, J., Vol. II, People (Cala.) vs. Washing.

ton. Sup. Ct. Cala. 1869; 36

59

317

38

37

People (Michigan) vs. Tyler.
Sup. Ct. Mich; 7 Micb. 161,
CAMPBELL, J., Vol. II,
People (N. Y.) vs. Conklin.
N. Y. Sup. Ct. 1841; 2 Hill,
67, BRONSON, J., Vol. II,
People (N. Y.) vs. McLeod.
N. Y. Sup. Ct. 1841; 25 Wen-
dell, 483, COWEN, J., Vol. I, 143
145, 161
People (N. Y.) vs. Warren.
Superior Ct. Buffalo, N. Y.
1895; 13 Misc. N. Y. 615,
WHITE, J., Vol. II,
People (N. Y.), Canal Ap-
praisers vs. See Canal Ap-
praisers vs. People.
People (N. Y.) ex rel. Barlow.
vs. Curtis. N. Y. Ct. of Ap-
peals, 1872; 50 N. Y. 321,
CHURCH, Ch. J.,
Vol. I,
37
Vol. II,
248, 270
People (N. Y.) ex rel. Young
vs. Stout. N. Y. Sup. Ct.
1894; 81 Hun, 336, BRAD-
LEY, J., Vol. II,
266, 275
Pepke, Claimant of Fourteen
Diamonds Rings. See Four-
teen Diamond Rings.

Percheman, United States vs.
See United States vs. Perche-

man.

292

Permoli VS. Municipality.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1845; 3 How.
589, CATRON, J., Vol. I, 540, 543
Vol. II,
165
Pervear vs. Commonwealth.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1866; 5 Wal-
lace, 475, CHASE, Ch. J.,
Vol. I,
543, 546
Petition, Kennett's. See Ken-
nett's Petition.
Phelps vs. McDonald. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1878; 99 U. S. 298,
SWAYNE, J., Vol. II,
Phelps, St. Paul &c. Ry. Co.
VS. See St. Paul &c. Ry. Co.
vs. Phelps.
Philadelphia and Reading
R. R. Co. vs. Kenney. U. S.
Cir. Ct. Penna. 1873; 18 Int.
Rev. Rec. 92, MCKENNA, J.,
Vol. I,
547
Philadelphia and Trenton R.
R. Co. vs. Stimpson. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1840; 14 Peters, 448,
STORY, J., Vol. II,
Philadelphia, Board of Port

98

See

Page

Wardens, Cooley vs.
See
Cooley vs. Board of Port
Wardens.
Philadelphia, Gilman vs.
Gilman vs. Philadelphia.
Philadelphia Southern S. S.
Co. vs. Pennsylvania. U.S.
Sup. Ct. 1887; 122 U. S. 326,
BRADLEY, J., Vol. II,
Philippine Tariff Case. See
Fourteen Diamond Rings.
Phillips vs. Payne. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1875; 92 U. S. 130,
SWAYNE, J., Vol. I, 536, 544
Vol. II,

Phoenix Ins. Co., Liverpool
Steam Co. vs. See Liver-
pool Steam Co. vs. Phoenix
Ins. Co.

Pickering, Lomax VS. See
Lomax vs. Pickering.
Pierce VS. New Hampshire.
See License Cases.
Pillerin, United States vs. See
United States vs. Pillerin.
Pilotage (Porto Rico) Case.
See Huus vs. N. Y. & Porto
Rico S. S. Co.

Pilot, The. U. S. Cir. Ct. App.
9th Cir. 1892; 7 U. S. App.
188, GILBERT, J., reversing
same case U. S. Dist. Ct.
Washington, 1891, 48 Fed.
Rep. 319, HANDFORD, J.,
Vol. II,

Piper, Brown vs. See Brown

vs. Piper.

Pitot, Sere vs. See Sere vs. Pitot.

51

361

83

547

Pittsburg and Sou. Coal Co.
vs. Bates. U. S. Sup. Ct.
1895; 156 U. S. 577, FIELD, J.,
Vol. I,
Pizarro, The. U. S. Sup. Ct.
1817; 2 Wheaton, 227,
STORY, J., Vol. I, 551, 552, 557
Police Jury of Concordia, Da-
See Davis vs. Police

vis vs.
Jury of Concordia.
Polk, Best vs. See Best vs.
Polk.

Pollard vs. Hagan. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1845; 3 Howard, 212,
MCKINLEY, J., Vol. I,

538 539, 553, 554, 559 Vol. II, 18, 159, 165, 282, 318 Pollard's Heirs vs. Kibbe. U.S. Sup. Ct. 1840; 14 Peters, 353, THOMPSON, J., Vol. I, 470 538, 539, 544, 554, 559

Page

Vol. II, 18, 20, 159, 165, 361 Pollard's Lessee vs. Files. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1844; 2 Howard, 591, CATRON, J., Vol. II, 18 159

Pollock vs. Farmers Loan
& T. Co. (Income Tax Case).
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1895; 157 U. S.
429, FULLER, Ch. J., Vol. I, 541
544, 547
3, 361

Vol. II,
Pong Ah Chee, In re. U. S.
Dist. Ct. Colo. 1883; 18 Fed.
Rep. 527, HOFFMAN, J., Vol.

ner vs. Porter. Porter, Jackson vs. son vs. Porter. Porterfield's Exrs. vs. Clark.

114

U. S. Sup. Ct. 1844; 2 Howard, 76, CATRON, J., Vol. II, 221 Portland, City of, Baker vs.

See Baker vs. City of Port-
land.

Porto Rico Pilotage Case. See
Huus vs. N. Y. & Porto Rico
S. S. Co.

Porto Rico Tariff Cases. See
Armstrong vs. United States.
De Lima vs. Bidwell. Dooley,
Smith & Co. VS. United
States, No. 1. Dooley, Smith
& Co. vs. United States, No.
2. Downes VS. Bidwell.
Goetze vs. United States.
Portuguese Tonnage Case. See
Oldfield vs. Marriott.

545

Port Wardens, Board of,
Cooley vs. See Cooley vs.
Board of Port Wardens.
Post Master General VS.
Early. U. S. Sup. Ct.
1827; 12 Wheaton, 136, MAR-
SHALL, Ch. J., Vol. I,
Potawatamie Indians vs. Uni-
ted States. See Pam-to-pee
vs. United States.
Powers vs. Barney. U. S. Cir.
Ct. S. D. N. Y. 1863; 5 Blatch-
ford, 202, NELSON, J., Vol. I, 547
Powers vs. Comly. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1879; 101 U. S. 789,
WAITE, Ch. J., Vol. II,
Poydras vs. Treasurer &c. of
Louisiana. U. S. Sup. Ct.
1855; 18 Howard, 192, Mc-
LEAN, J., Vol. II,
Poydras, State of Louisiana, vs.
See State of Louisiana, vs.

73

12

52

Prigg vs. Pennsylvania (Fug-
itive Slave law). U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1842; 16 Peters, 539,
STORY, J., Vol. I, 536, 541, 543
Prize Cases, The. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1862; 2 Black, 635,
GRIER, J., Vol. II, 124, 126
Propagation of the Gospel,

Society for. See Society for
the Propagation of the Gospel.
Provincial Fisheries, In re.
Sup. Ct. Canada, 1895; 26
Can. Sup. Ct. 444, SIR HENRY
STRONG, TASCHEREAU,
GWYNNE, GIROUARD, JJ.
Vol. II,
Quah, Sah, case of. See Sah

Quah's case.
Quarantine Cases. Compagnie
Francaise vs. State Board of
Health. Minn. & St. P. R.
R. Co. vs. Milner. Morgan S.
S. Co. vs. Board of Health,
La. People vs. Compagnie
Generale.

320

Quarles, In re. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1895; 158 U. S. 532, GRAY, J., Vol. I, 537, 551

Queue, The Chinese Case.

See

163 U. S. 504, WHITE, J., Vol. II, 33, 34, 63, 86, 130,132 133, 134, 214 Race Horse, Ward vs. See

Ward vs. Race Horse. Radford, Craig vs. See Craig

vs. Radford. Rahrer, In re. U. S. Sup. Ct.

See

1891; 140 U. S. 545, FULLER, Ch. J., Vol. II, Rahtjen's &c. Co., Holzapfel's &c. Co. vs. See Holzapfel's &c. Co. vs. Rahtjen's &c. Co. Railroad Co., Dennick vs. Dennick vs. R. R. Co. Railroad Companies. See Bell vs. Atl. & Pac. R. R. Co. Bell's Gap R. R. Co. VS. Pennsylvania. Buffalo R. & P. R. R. Co. vs. Lavery. Buttz vs. Northern Pacific R. R. Co. Capital Traction Co. vs. Hof. Cherokee Nation vs. Southern Kansas Ry. Co. Chicago, Milwaukee &c. R. R. Co. vs. Tompkins. Chicago, Rock Island and Pac. R. R. Co. vs. McGlinn. Dennick vs. R. R. Co. Fort Leavenworth R. R. Co. vs. Lowe. Herman vs. New Orleans R. R. Co. Hubgh vs. New Orleans R. R. Co. Illinois Cent. R. R. Co. vs. Illinois. Leavenworth &c. R. R. Co. vs. United States. Metropolitan R. R. Co. vs. Dist. of Col. Minn. & St. P. R. R. vs. Milner. Missouri, K. & T. R. R. Co. vs. Roberts. Missouri, K. & T. R R. Co. vs. United States. Phila. & Reading R. R. Co. vs. Kenney. Phila. & Trenton R. R. Co. vs. Stimpson. Pittsburgh & Southern Coal Co. vs. Bates. St. Paul &c. Ry. Co. vs. Phelps. Stroud vs. Missouri River R. R. Co. United States vs. Joint Traffic Assn. United States vs. Union Pacific Ry. Co. Utah & Nor. R. R. Co. vs. Fisher. Ramsey, Murphy vs. phy vs. Ramsey.

See Mur

Race Horse, In re. U.S. Cir.

Ct. Wyoming, 1895; 70 Fed.
Rep. 598, RINER, J., reversed
sub nomine Ward vs. Race
Horse. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1896;

See United States vs. Kauscher.

Ravesies vs. United States. U. S. Cir. Ct. Alabama, 1889; 37 Fed. Rep. 447, PARDEE, J.,

51

Blight vs. Rochester.

Rodgers, United States vs. See

United States vs. Rodgers

207

54

83

See

Rose, United States vs. United States vs. Rose. Roselius, United States vs. See

United States vs. Roselius. Ross vs. Eells. U. S. Cir. Ct. Washington, 1893; 56 Fed. Rep. 855, HANDFORD, J., Vol. II,

Ross vs. United States. U.S. Ct. of Claims, 1894; 29 Ct. of Clms. 176, RICHARDSON, Ch. J.

Ross, Bauman vs. See Bauman vs. Ross.

Ross, Eells vs. See Eells vs. Ross.

Ross, Ex parte. U. S. Dist.

Ct. Ohio, 1869; 2 Bond, 252;
Fed. Cas. 12,069, LEAVITT, J.,
Vol. II,

Ross, In re.

225

267

U. S. Sup. Ct. 1891; 140 U. S. 453, FIELD, J., Vol. 1, 54, 537, 541, 545, 552 553, 556, 557, 559, 560 64, 139, 140, 238, 333 335, 345, 346 U. S. Dist. Ct.

Vol. II,

Roth, In re. S. D. N. Y.

1883; 15 Fed.

Rep. 506, BROWN, J., Vol. II, 267 Roulet, Alexander vs. See Al

exander vs. Roulet.

Roulet, New York Ins. Co. vs.
See New York Ins. Co. vs.
Roulet.

Rowe, In re. U. S. Cir. Ct.
8th Cir. Ct. 1896; 77 Fed. Rep.
161, CALDWELL, J., Vol. II, 267
Ruiz, Ornelas vs. See Ornelas
vs. Ruiz.

Russian Deserter Case. See United States, &c., vs. Alexandroff

Rutgers

VS. Waddington

(Tory Rent Case). Mayor's Ct. N. Y. City, 1784; Vol. II, 36 Sah Quah's Case. U. S. Dist. Ct. Alaska, 1886; 31 Fed. Rep. 327, DAWSON, J., Vol, I, 554 556, 557, 559, 562 Vol. II, 166, 168, 235 Sailors Snug Harbor, Inglis vs. See Inglis vs. Sailors Snug Harbor.

St. Oloff, The. U. S. Dist.

Ct. 1790; 2 Peters Adm. Rep.
428, PETERS, J., Vol. II, 330, 331
St. Oloff, Weiburg vs. See
W'eiburg vs. St. Oloff.

St. Paul &c. Ry. Co. vs.
Phelps. U. S. Sup. Ct.
1890; 137 U. S. 528, LAMAR,
J., Vol. II,

Salamoni, Feol vs. See Feol vs.
Salamoni.

Sala's Succession. Sup. Ct.
Louisiana, 1898; 50 La. Ann.

1009, NICHOLLS, Ch. J.,

Vol. II,

225

55

548