Gambar halaman
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

United States vs. Rio Grande Dam &c. Co. Mexican Duty Case. See Fleming vs. Page. Miami County Commis., Peck VS. See Peck vs. Miami County Commis. Michigan, Lyng vs. See Lyng vs. Michigan. Michigan, People of, vs. Tyler. See People vs. Tyler. Miller vs. Sherry. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1864; 2 Wall. 237, SWAYNE, J., Vol. II, Miller vs. United States, U. S. Sup. Ct. 1870; 11 Wallace, 268, STRONG, J., Vol. I, 536, 544 Vol. II, 265, 361 U. S. Cir. Ct. Penna. 1835; 23 Fed. Rep. 32, ACHESON, J., Vol. II,

Miller, In re.

Milligan, Ex parte. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1866; 4 Wallace, 2, DAVIS, J., Vol. I,

295

265

541, 542

545, 551, 556

Miln, New York vs. See New

York vs. Miln.

Milner, Minn. & St. P. R. R.

Co. vs. See Milner vs. Minn.
&c. R. R. Co.

Milnor vs. Metz. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1842; 16 Peters, 221, CA-
TRON, J., Vol. II,
Mineau, In re. U. S. Cir. Ct.
Vermont, 1891; 45 Fed. Rep.
188, WHEELER, J., Vol. II,

Miner's Bank vs. Iowa. U.S.
Sup. Ct. 1851; 12 Howard, 1,
DANIEL, J., Vol. I,
Mining and Land Companies.
See Land and Mining Com-
panies.

Minnesota & St. P. R. R. Co.
vs. Milner. U. S. Cir. Ct.
Mich. 1893; 57 Fed. Rep.
276, PER CURIAM, Vol. II,
Minnesota, State of, vs. Camp-
bell. See State of Minnesota
vs. Campbell.
Minor vs. Happersett (Wom-
an's Rights case). U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1874; 21 Wallace, 162,

293

267 275

539

51

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Missouri River R. R. Co., Stroud vs. See Stroud vs. Missouri &c. R. R. Co.

Mitchell vs. Bunch. Ct. of Chancery, N. Y. 1831; 2 Paige's Ch. 605, WALWORTH, Chan., Vol. II,

217

217

295

Mitchell vs. Harmony. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1851; 13 Howard, 115, TANEY, Ch. J., Vol. I, 500 549, 551 Mitchel vs. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1835; 9 Peters 711, BALDWIN, J., same case 1841; 15 Peters, 52, WAYNE, J., Vol. I,

538, 539, 553, 554, 559 Vol. II, 147, 162, 165, 207, 232 Mobile vs. Eslava. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1842; 16 Peters 234, McLEAN, J., Vol. I,

560

[blocks in formation]

Page

Page

vs. Moor.

Moore vs. Illinois. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1852; 14 Howard 13,
GRIER, J., Vol. I.
Moore vs. United States. U. S.
Ct. of Claims 1897; 32 Ct. of
Claims 593, PEELLE, J., Vol.
II,

Moore, Knowlton VS. See

See

557

223

Knowlton vs. Moore. Moore, Livingstone vs. Livingstone vs. Moore. Moore, United States vs. See United States vs. Moore. Morant, United States vs. See United States vs. Morant. Moreno, United States vs. See United States vs. Moreno. Morgan S. S. Co. vs. Louisiana Board of Health. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1886; 118 U. S. 455, MILLER, J., Vol. II, Mormon Church vs. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1890; 136 U. S. 1, BRADLEY, J., Vol. I, 62, 64, 71, 128, 129, 130 536, 538, 539, 541, 544, 550 Vol. II, 361 Morrill vs. Jones. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1882; 106 U. S. 466, WAITE, Ch. J., Vol. I,

51

544

Vol. II,

361

[blocks in formation]

Morris, United States vs. See
United States vs. Morris.
Morton vs. United States. See
United States vs. Sandoral.

Morton, Taylor vs. See Taylor
vs. Morton.

Mostyn vs. Fabrigas. King's

Bench, 1774; Cowper, 161, LORD MANSFIELD, Vol. I, 500 551

Motherwell, United States ex rel.
Alexandroff vs. See United
States ex rel. Alexandroff vs.
Motherwell.

Mott, Martin vs. See Martin
vs. Mott.

Mrs. Gue Lim, United States vs.
See United States vs. Gue
Lim, Mrs.

Muckey, Goodfellow vs. See
Goodfellow vs. Muckey.
Muller vs. Baldwin. Queen's
Bench, 1874; L. R. 9 Q. B.
457, LUSH, J., Vol. I,

571

[blocks in formation]

See

Nash (alias Robins), United States vs. See United States vs. Nash (alias Robins). Natal, Lord Bishop of Lord Bishop of Natal. National Bank vs. County of Yankton. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1879; 101 U. S. 129, WAITE, Ch. J., Vol. I, 471, 539 National Bank, County of Wilson. See County of Wilson vs. National Bank. Navarre vs. United States. U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1898; 33 Ct. of Clms. 235, HowRY, J.; affirmed U. S. Sup. Ct. 1899; 173 U. S. 77, MCKENNA, J., Vol. II, 223 Navarre, United States vs. See United States vs. Na

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

1890; 135 U. S. 1, MILLER, J., Vol. I, 190, 536, 545, 556 Neal, Alameda vs. See Alameda vs. Neal.

Nebraska ex rel. Thayer, Boyd VS. See Boyd vs. Nebraska. Neely vs. Henkel. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1901; 180 U. S. 109, HARLAN, J., affirming In re Neely, Ú. S. Cir. Ct. 1901; 103 Fed. Rep. 626 and 631, LACOMBE, J., Vol. I, 138, 139 173, 174, 175, 177, 178 (opinion in full), 538, 541, 544 551, 552, 554, 556, 559 247, 248, 254, 260 261, 262, 361 Neilson, Foster and Elam vs. See Foster and Elam vs. Neilson.

Vol. II,

Nelson vs. United States. U.

See

S. Cir. Ct. Oregon, 1887; 30 Fed. Rep. 112, DEADY, J.; affirming United States vs. Nelson, U. S. Dist. Ct. Alaska, 1886, 29 Fed. Rep. 202, DAWSON, J., Vol. I, Nelson, United States vs. United States vs. Nelson. Nereide, The. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1815; 9 Cranch, 388, MARSHALL, Ch. J., Vol. II, Netherclift vs. Robertson. U. S. Cir. Ct. S. D. N. Y. 1886; 23 Blatchford, 546; 27 Fed. Rep. 737, COXE, J., Vol. I, Vol. II,

Nevada, Crandall vs. See Crandall vs. Nevada.

553

190

439

73

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Vol. II,

165

New Orleans VS. United States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1836; 10 Peters, 662, MCLEAN, J., Vol. I, 536, 542, 543, 553, 559 Vol. II, 165 New Orleans vs. Winter. U.

S. Sup. Ct. 1816; 1 Wheaton,
91, MARSHALL, Ch. J., Vol. I, 27
New Orleans, City of, Fou-
vergne vs. See Fouvergne vs.
City of New Orleans.
New Orleans, May vs. See
May vs. New Orleans.
New Orleans &c. R. R. Co.,
Herman vs. See Herman vs.
New Orleans R. R. Co.
New Orleans R. R. Co., Hubgh

VS. See Hubgh vs. New Or-
leans R. R. Co.

New Orleans Savings Bank,
Addison vs. See Addison
VS. New Orleans Savings
Bank.

New York vs. Miln.

U. S.

[blocks in formation]

Page

213, 229 Norris vs. City of Boston. (Passenger cases). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1849; 7 Howard, 283, Vol. II,

New York Indians, United See United States

States vs.

vs. New York Indians. New York Ins. Co. vs. Roulet. N. Y. Ct. of Errors, 1840; 24 Wendell, 505, BRADISH, Prest. &c., NELSON, Ch. J., Vol. II, New York Life Ins. Co., Varet VS. See Varet vs. New York Life Ins. Co.

New York, Mayor of, Duryee vs.

See Duryee vs. Mayor &c. New York, Mayor of, Hender

son vs. See Henderson vs. Mayor of New York. New York (People), Canal Appraisers vs. See Canal Appraisers vs. People.

New York (People) vs. Conklin. See People (New York) vs. Conklin.

New York, People of &c. vs. Curtis. See People &c. vs. Curtis.

New York, People of &c. vs. Dibble. See Cutler vs. Dibble. New York, People of &c. vs. McLeod. See People &c. vs. McLeod.

New York, People of &c. vs. Stout. See People &c. vs. Stout.

New York, People of, vs. Warren. See People &c. vs. War

ren.

298

New York (State of), Canal
Appraisers vs. See Canal Ap-
praisers vs. New York.
Nicholson, Gaines VS., See
Gaines vs. Nicholson.
Nina, The. Adm. & Eccl. Ct.
(English) 1867; L. R. 2 Adm.
and Eccl. 44; SIR ROBERT
PHILLIMORE; S. C. on ap-
peal, L. R. 2 Privy Coun.
38, LORD ROMILLY, Vol. II, 330
Ninfa La. See La Ninfa, The.
Nishimura Ekiu vs. United

States. See Ekiu, Nishimura,
vs. United States.
Nofire VS. United States.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1897; 164
U. S. 657, BREWER,
Vol. II,

J.,

229

Norman vs. Heist. Penna. Sup. Ct. 1843; 5 W. & S.

Page

51, 59 North Dakota, State of, ex rel. Tompton vs. Donoyer. See State &c. vs. Donoyer. Northern Pacific R. R. Co., Buttz vs. See Buttz VS. Northern Pac. R. R. Co. North German Lloyd S. S. Co. vs. Hedden; same vs. Magone. U. S. Cir. Ct. New Jersey, 1890; 43 Fed. Rep. 17, WALES, J., Vol. II, 77, 332 North Western Life Ins. Co.,

Shepard vs. See Shepard
vs. North West. Life Ins. Co.
Norwood's Lessee, Owings vs.
See Owings vs. Norwood's
Lessee.

Nunan Ho-Ah-Kow vs. See
Ho-Ah-Kow vs. Nunan

Nye, Leonard vs. Leonard vs.
Nye.

Oakey vs. Bennett. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1850; 11 Howard, 33,
MCLEAN, J., Vol. I,
Vol. II,

Ogden vs. Blackledge. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1804; 2 Cranch, 272,
CUSHING, J. Vol. II,
Ogden, Gibbons vs. See Gib-
bons vs. Ogden.

Ohio, State of, vs. Vanderpool.

See State &c. vs. Vanderpool.
Okely, Bank of Columbia vs.
See Bank of Columbia vs.
Okely.

Oldfield vs. Marriott. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1850; 10 Howard,
146, WAYNE, J., Vol. II,
Old Settlers, United States vs.
See United States vs. Old
Settlers.

Oliver's Executors, Gill vs. See
Gill vs. Oliver's Executors.
Oloff St., The, Weiburg vs.

See

Weiburg vs. The St. Oloff. One hundred & thirty-four thousand feet of lumber &c. U. S. Dist. Ct. N. D. N. Y. 1858; 4 Blatchford, 182, NELSON, J., Vol. II,

220

165

363

76

71

O'Neill vs. Vermont. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1892; 144 U. S. 323,
BLATCHFORD, J., Vol. I,
549, 550, 556, 557

543

(Penn.), 171, GIBSON, Ch. J., Vol. I,

474

Opel vs. Shoup. Sup. Ct. Iowa, 1896; 100 Iowa, 407

[blocks in formation]

Ornelas vs. Ruiz. U. S. Sup.

Ct. 1896; 161 U. S. 502, FUL-
LER, Ch. J., Vol. II,

267

266

37

Orpen, In re. U. S. Cir. Ct.
Cala. 1898; 86 Fed Rep. 760,
MORROW, J., Vol. II,
Orr vs. Hodgson. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1819; 4 Wheaton, 453,
STORY, J., Vol. II, 13, 15, 179
Orser vs. Hoag. N. Y. Sup.
Ct. 1842; 3 Hill, 79, NELSON,
Ch. J., Vol. II,
Ortiz, Ex parte. U. S. Cir.
Ct. Minn. 1900; 100 Fed. Rep.
955, LOCHRAN, J., Vol. I, 538, 539
545, 551, 553, 554, 556, 557, 561
Vol II,
128, 165, 170
Osborn vs. Bank of United
States. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1824;
9 Wheaton, 738, MARSHALL,
Ch. J., Vol. II,
Osborne, United States VS.

See United States vs. Osborne.
Oteiza y, Cortes, In re. See
Cortes, Luiz Oteiza y, In re.
Owings vs. Norwood's Lessee.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1809; 5
Cranch, 344, MARSHALL, Ch.
J., Vol. II,
Packard, Davis vs. See Davis
vs. Packard.

112.

16, 246

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

See King vs.

55

207

Parham, Woodruff vs. See Woodruff vs. Parham. Parkman, The Ship. See Ship Parkman, The. Parks, King vs. Parks. Parlement Belge, The. Court of Appeal (Gt. Britain), 1880; 5 Probate Div. 197; 42 Law Times, 273; 28 W. R. 642, BRETT, L. J., Vol. I, Parrot, In re Tiburcio. U. S. Cir. Ct. Cala. 1880; 6 Sawyer, 349, HOFFMAN and SAWYER, JJ., Vol. II, Passenger Cases (Cited collectively). See Smith vs. Turner, Norris vs. City of Boston, Vol. II, 51, 59, 349 Passenger Cases. See Henderson vs. Mayor of New York. New York vs. Miln. Norris vs. City of Boston. Smith Turner.

VS.

Patten, United States vs. See United States vs. Patten. Patterson vs. Jenks. U. S.

28

Sup. Ct. 1829: 2 Peters, 216, MARSHALL, Ch. J., Vol. II, 213 Patterson, Hall vs. See Hall vs. Patterson.

Paulinson vs. United States.
See Caldera Cases.
Pawashick, The. U. S. Dist.
Ct. Mass. 1872; 2 Lowell,
142, LOWELL, J., Vol. II,
Pawlett, Society for the Prop-
agation of the Gospel vs.
See Society &c. vs. Pawlett.
Payne, Phillips vs. See Phillips
vs. Payne.

Payne, United States vs. See
United States VS. Payne
Peabody vs. United States.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1900; 175
U. S. 546, PECKHAM, J., Vol.
II,
Peacock vs. Hawaii &c. Sup.
Ct. Hawaii, 1899; 12 Hawaii,
27, FREAR, J., Vol. I,

330

194

220

« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »