Holmes vs. Jennison. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1840; 14 Peters, 540,
TANEY, Ch. J., Vol. I, 36, 37
544, 558, 561
Vol. II,
216, 248, 270, 361
Holzapfel's, etc., Co. VS.
Rahtjen's, etc., Co. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1901; 22 Sup. Ct.
Reporter, 6. See 183 U. S.
not yet published, PECK-
HAM, J., Vol. II,
Hooe vs. Jamieson. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1897; 166 U. S. 395, FUL-
LER, Ch. J., Vol. I,
27, 540

Hooper vs. United States.
U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1887; 22
Ct. of Clms. 408, Davis, J.,
Vol. II,

328

284

U. S. Sup. Ct. 1892; 143 U. S. 570, BLATCHFORD, J. Houston, Brown vs. See Brown vs. Houston.

Howell, United States vs. See United States vs. Howell. Hoyt, Gelston vs. See Gelston vs. Hoyt.

Hubbell vs. United States. See Caldera cases.

Hubgh vs. New Orleans &c.
R. R. Co. Sup. Ct. Louisi-
ana, 1851; 6 La. Ann. 495.
EUSTIS, J., Vol. I,
Huckabee, United States ex rel.
&c. vs. United States ex rel.
Lyon vs. Huckabee.
Hughes vs. Edwards. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1824; 9 Wheaton,
489, WASHINGTON, J., Vol.

II,
Hunt, Hallet vs.

vs. Hunt.
Hunter, Fairfax vs.

155

14, 22, 43, 179 See Hallet

See Fair

Hylton vs. Brown. U. S. Cir. Ct. Penna. 1806; 1 Washington C. C. 298, 343, Fed. Cas. 6982, WASHINGTON, J., Vol. II, 13, 128, 146 States

Hylton vs. United

(Hylton Carriage Case). U.S. Sup. Ct. 1796; 3 Dallas, 171, CHASE, J., Vol. II, Hylton, Ware vs. See Ware vs. Hylton.

Ice, Mehlin vs. See Mehlin vs.
Ice.

Idler, Borgmeyer vs. See Borg-
meyer vs. Idler.

Illinois, Illinois Cent. R. R. Co.
VS. See Illinois Cent. R. R.
Co. vs. Illinois.
Illinois, Moore vs.
vs. Illinois.
Illinois, Munn vs.
vs. Illinois.

See Moore

See Munn

Illinois, Spies vs. See Spies vs. Illinois.

3

Illinois Cent. R. R. Co. vs.
Illinois. U. S. Sup. Ct.
1892; 146 U. S. 387, FIELD,
J., Vol. II,
158, 314, 318
Illinois, State of, Ker, vs. See

Ker vs. State of Illinois.
Illinois Steel Co. vs. Budzisz.
U. S. Cir. Ct. Wisconsin,
1897; 82 Fed. Rep. 160, SEA-
MAN, J., Vol. II,
Illinois Steel Co., Budzisz vs.
See Budzisz vs. Illinois Steel
Co.

Income Tax Case. See Pol

lock vs. Farmers L. & T. Co.
Indemnity, Chinese Cases. See
Caldera Cases.
Indian names. See Alberty

vs. United States; In re Cap-
tain Jack; Cherokee Nation
Cases; Ex parte Crow Dog;
Elk vs.

VS.

VS.

Wilkins; Famous Smith VS. United States; Fellows VS. Blacksmith; Frost vs. Wenie; In re GonShay-Ee; Goodfellow Muckey; Journey cake Cherokee Nation; Journeycake vs. United States; Kansas Indians, The; In re Mayfield; New York Indians, The; New York Indians vs. United States; Nofire VS. United States; Pam-to-pee vs. United States; Potawata

225

See

169

mie Indian VS. United States; In re Race Horse; Sah Quah's Case; Seneca Nation vs. Christie; Stephens vs. Cherokee Nation; Thebo vs. Choctaw Tribe of Indians; United States vs. Bridleman; United States vs. Joseph; United States vs. Kagama; United States vs. Leathers; United States vs. New York Indians; United States vs. Pridgeon; United States vs. Sturgeon; United States vs. Sunol; United States VS. Yellow Sun; Ward vs. Race Horse; Western Cherokee Indians vs. United States. Indians, The New York vs. United States. See New York Indians vs. United States. Indians, The Kansas. See Kansas Indians, The. Ingersoll, Maiden VS. Maiden vs. Ingersoll. Inglis vs. Sailors Snug Harbor. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1830; 3 Peters, 99, THOMPSON, J., Vol. I, 554, 555, 557, 558, 561 Vol. II, In re. See name of party. But also see Chinese names; Indian names; Extradition matters; In re generally. In re generally. See Alter's Appeal; In re Atocha; In re Ayers; In re Baez; In re Baldwin; Calvin's Cuse; The Clinton Bridge; In re Cooper; Dainese's Case; In re Debs; Desbois' Case; Fichera's Case; Henfield's Case; Jugiro, In re Shibuya; In re Kemmler; Kennett's Petition; Lopez and Sattler's Case; Lord Bishop of Natal; Ex parte McNeil; Ex parte Milligan; In re Neagle; Ex parte Ortiz; In re Panzara; In re Tuburchio Parrott; In re Quarles; Sah Quah's Case; Ex parte Scott; Ex parte Siebold; In re Tatsu; Ex parte Valandigham; In re Vidal. Insular Cases. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1901; 182 U. S. 1-392 (referred to collectively). See also separate references to

individual cases.

Vol. I, 28, 60 62, 71, 117 to 127, 190, 443, 444 Insular Cases Appendix, Vol. I, 459 to end of Vol. I. Vol. II, 4, 24, 67, 124, 129, 138 149, 153, 165, 166, 167, 171 178, 180, 283 Insular Cases. See Armstrong VS. United States (Porto Rico); Crossman VS. United States (Hawaii); De Lima VS. Bidwell (Porto Rico & New York Dingley Act); Dooley, Smith & Co. vs. United States (Porto Rico War Tariff); Dooley, Smith & Co. vs. United States (Porto Rico Foraker Act); Downes vs. Bidwell (Porto Rico and New York Foraker

Act); Fourteen Diamond
Rings, Pepke

Claimant

(Philippine Cuse); Goetze vs.
United States (Porto Rico
and N. Y. Dingley Act;) Huus
vs. N. Y. & Porto Rico S. S.
Co. (Porto Rico Pilotage
Case).

Insurance Co. VS. Brame.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1877; 95 U. S.
754, HUNT, J., Vol. I,
Ins. Co., Am., Canter vs.

See

American Ins. Co. vs. Canter. Ins. Co., Great Western, United States vs. See Great Western Ins. Co. vs. United States.

Ins. Co., Albany County, Whiton VS. See Whiton vs. Albany County Ins. Co.

Ins. Co., New York, Varet vs. See Varet vs. N. Y. Ins. Co. Ins. Co., The Phoenix, Liver

pool Steam Co. vs. See Liverpool Steam Co. vs. Phoenix Ins. Co.

Ins. Co. (New York), Roulet vs.

See New York Ins. Co. vs.
Roulet.

Ins. Co., Nor. West. Life Co.,
Shepard vs. See Shepard vs.
Nor. West. L. I. Co.

Ins. Co. Suffolk, Williams, vs. See Williams vs. Suffolk, Ins. Co. Interstate Commerce Comm. vs. Brimson. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1894; 154 U. S. 447, HARLAN,

E

155

See Car

359

38

Sup. Ct. 1800; 1 Johns. Cas. 399, PER CURIAM, Vol. II, Jackson, Black vs. See Black vs. Jackson. Jackson, Carver vs. ver vs. Jackson. Jackson vs. Clark. U. S. Sup. Ct. 1818; 3 Wheaton, 1, MARSHALL, Ch. J., Vol. II, Jackson vs. Decker. N. Y. Sup. Ct. 1814; 11 Johns. (N. Y.) 418, SPENCER, J., Vol. II, 37 Jackson vs. Lunn. N. Y. Sup.

Cas. 109,

17

37, 38

Ct. 1802; 3 Johns. KENT, J., Vol. II, Jackson vs. Porter. U. S. Cir. Ct. N. Y. 1825; 1 Paine, 457, THOMPSON, J., Vol. II, Jackson vs Wright. N. Y. Sup. Ct. 1809; 4 Johns. Cas. 75, VAN NESS, J., Vol. II, James G. Swan, The, United

States vs. See United States vs. The James G. Swan. Jamieson, Hooe vs. See Hooe vs. Jamieson.

Jane, The Ship. See Ship Jane, The.

Janis vs. United States, U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1897; 32 Ct. of Clms. 407, NOTT, Ch. J., Vol. II, Jansen, Talbot vs. See Talbot vs. Jansen. Jecker vs. Magee.

Same as

Haver vs. Yaker. Jecker vs. Montgomery. U.

207

37

223

13, 136

Jordan vs. Goldman. Dist.
Ct. Oklahoma, 1891; 1
Okla. Rep. 406, GREEN, J.,
Vol. II,

Jordan vs. Williams. U. S.
Cir. Ct. Mass. 1851; 1 Curtis
69, Fed. Cas. 7528, CURTIS, J.,
Vol. II,
Joseph, United States vs. See
United States vs. Joseph.
Josephs vs. United States.
U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1865; 1
Ct. of Clms. 197, NOTT, Ch.
J., Vol. II,
Jost vs. Jost. Sup. Ct. Dist.

221

333

155

U.

S. Sup. Ct. 1834; 8 Peters,

308, THOMPSON, J., Vol. I, 470,554

Kelley, In re. U. S. Dist. Ct. Minn. 1885; 25 Fed. Rep. 268, NELSON, J., and 1886; 26 Fed. Rep. 852, BREWER, J., Vol. II,

Kelley, In re Peter. U. S.
Dist. Ct. Mass. 1874; 2 Low-
ell, 339, Fed. Cas. 7655,
LOWELL, J., Vol. II,
Kelly vs. Harrison. N. Y.
Sup. Ct. 1800; 2 Johns. Cas.
29, KENT, J., Vol. II,
Kemmler, In re. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1890; 136 U. S. 436, FUL-
LER, Ch. J., Vol. I,

Vol. II,

Page

264

404

194

62, 549

Kendall vs. United States.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1838; 12
Peters, 524, THOMPSON, J.,
Vol. I,
Kendall vs. United States.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1868; 7 Wal-
lace, 113, MILLER, J., affirm-
ing same case, 1865, 1 U. S.
Ct. of Clms. 261, PECK, J.,
Vol. II,

Kennard vs. Louisiana. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1875; 92 U. S. 480,
WAITE, Ch. J., Vol. I,
Kennett vs. Chambers. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1852; 14 Howard, 38,
TANEY, Ch. J., Vol. I,

Vol. II,

56

540

223

540, 546

536, 544

358, 361

Kennett, Bryan vs. See Bryan

vs. Kennett.

Page

Sup.

216

548

157, 301

Keyser vs. Hitz. U. S.
Ct. 1890; 133 U. S. 138,
HARLAN, J., Vol. II,
Kibbe, Pollard's Heirs vs. See
Pollard's Heirs vs. Kibbe.
Kilbourn vs. Thompson. U. S.
Sup. Ct. 1880; 103 U. S. 168,
MILLER, J., Vol. I,
536, 542
King vs. Parks. N. Y. Sup.
Ct. 1822; 19 Johns. 375,
SPENCER, Ch. J., Vol. I,
King & Coxe, United States vs.
See United States vs. King &
Coxe.
Kinkead vs. United States.
U. S. Sup. Ct. 1893; 150
U. S. 483, BROWN, J., affirm-
ing same case, Court of
Claims, 1883; 18 Ct. of Clms.
504, DRAKE, Ch. J., and 24
Ct. of Claims, 459, SCOFIELD,
J., Vol. II,
Knight VS. United States
Land Ass'n. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1891; 142 U. S. 161,
LAMAR, J., Vol. II,
Knight, United States vs.
United States vs. Knight.
Knowlton vs. Moore (War
Revenue inheritance tax
case). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1900;
178 U. S. 41, WHITE, J.,
Vol. I, 477, 478, 491, 540, 546, 580
Knox vs. Lee (Legal Tender
case). U. S. Sup. Ct. 1870;
12 Wallace, 457, STRONG and
BRADLEY, JJ., Vol. I, 54, 62, 536
Kreplin, The Elwine. See El-
wine Kreplin, The.
Krojanker, In re. U. S. Cir.
Ct. S. D. N. Y. 1890; 40 Fed.
Rep. 482, LACOMBE, J.,
Vol. II,

Gen'l Term, 1885; 37 Hun,
476, DAVIS, J., Vol. II,
La Abra Silver Mng. Co. vs.
United States. U. S. Sup.
Ct. 1899; 175 U. S. 423, HAR-
LAN, J., Vol. I, 553, 555, 559, 560
Vol. II,
86, 302, 309
La Abra and Weil Cases. See
Frelinghuysen vs. Key.
Labadi vs. United States.
U. S. Ct. of Claims, 1896; 31
Ct. of Clms. 205, WELDON, J.,
Vol. II,
223

La Chapelle, United States vs.
See United States vs. La
Chapelle.