Gambar halaman
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

Entered according to act of Congress, in the year one thousand eight hundred and ninety-four,

BY BANKS & BROTHERS,

in the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington.

Rec. April 5, 1894

JAMES B. LYON,

PRINTER, ELECTROTYPER AND BINDER,

LYON BLOCK, ALBANY, N. Y.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Third Department. Fourth Department.

HON. STEPHEN L. MAYHAM. P. J. HON. GEORGE A. HARDIN, P. J.

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

CAUSES in which the decisions contained in these Reports have

been passed upon by the Court of Appeals.

[blocks in formation]

MATSON. ABBEY..
Judgment of trial court modified by striking out the award of costs in the
trial court, and, as modified, affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff in the
Court of Appeals; costs awarded on appeal to General Term not dis-
turbed: 141 N. Y. 179.

MATTER OF LEE...

[blocks in formation]

Judgment affirmed: 141 N. Y. 58.

M. KENZIE T. HATTON..

[blocks in formation]

Judgment affirmed: 141 N. Y. 6.

MOOKE T. HANOVER FIRE INS. Co......

71

199

Judgment reversed: 141 N. Y. 219.

PEOPLE EX REL. EDISON GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY . BARKER... 74

418

Orders reversed: 141 N. Y. 251.

PEOPLE EX REL. SECOND AVENUE R. R. Co. 7. BARKER.......

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

(Sub nomine WHITE . INEBRIATES' HOME in Court of Appeals.)

Order affirmed: 141 N. Y. 123.

The attention of the profession is called to the fact that the Court of Appeals in many cases decide an appeal upon other grounds than those stated in the opinion of the court below.

The affirmance or reversal of the judgment of the General Term does not neces sarily show that the Court of Appeals concurred in, or dissented from, the statements contained in the opinion of the Supreme Court.-[REP.

« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »