 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1891 - 700 halaman
...parties were agents for other persons, and acted as such agents in making the contract, so as to give the benefit of the contract on the one hand to, and...does not deny that it is binding on those whom, on its face, it purports to bind, but shows that it also binds another, by reason that the act of the... | |
 | 1872 - 978 halaman
...shew who the person was for whom the broker acted as agent in making the contract, " so as to give the benefit of the contract on the one hand to, and charge with liability on the other, the unearned principals." In every case, (10) 4 Taunt. 575. (11) 1 Canipb. 85. (12) 1 Campb. 109. (13)... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Roger Meeson, William Newland Welsby - 1837 - 964 halaman
...give the benefit of the contract on the one hand to (A), and charge with liability on the other (c), the unnamed principals: and this, whether the agreement...be in writing by the Statute of Frauds : and this eridence in no way contradicts the written agreement. It does not deny that it is binding on those... | |
 | Colin Blackburn Baron Blackburn - 1845 - 374 halaman
...parties were agents for other persons and acted as " such agents in making the contract, so as to give " the benefit of the contract on the one hand to, and..." charge with liability on the other, the unnamed " principal, and this, whether the agreement be or be " not required to be in writing by the Statute... | |
 | William Paley - 1847 - 732 halaman
...parties were agents for other persons, and acted as such agents in making the contract, EO as to give the benefit of the contract on the one hand to. and...the statute of frauds ; and this evidence in no way contradwts the written agreement. It does not deny that it is binding upon those whom, on the face... | |
 | 1848 - 1170 halaman
...acted as such agents in making the contract, so as to give the benefit of the contract on the one hand, and charge with liability, on the other, the unnamed...evidence in no way contradicts the written agreement." So it is submitted here the evidence was admissible to give the benefit of the contract to the plaintiff,... | |
 | John Pitt Taylor - 1848 - 756 halaman
...benefit of the contract to (u), the unnamed principal, such evidence will be received ; and this, too, whether the agreement be or be not required to be in writing by the Statute of Frauds. The distinction between these two cases is, that, in the former the parol evidence would clearly contradict... | |
 | California. Supreme Court - 1851 - 672 halaman
...parties were agents for other persons and acted as such agents iu making the contract, so as to give the benefit of the contract, on the one hand, to,...with liability, on the other, the unnamed principals. (See Story on Agency ', sees. 269, 270, and note* ; and the note to Thompson v. Davenport, 2 Smiths... | |
 | Joseph Chitty - 1855 - 1120 halaman
...were agents for other persons, and acted as such agents in making the contract of sale, so as to give the benefit of the contract, on the one hand to. and...this whether the agreement be or be not required to te in writing by the statute of frauds. But the court remark the distinction broadly between such a... | |
 | Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court - 1862 - 670 halaman
...were agents for other persons, and acted as such agents in making the contract of sale, so as to give the benefit of the contract, on the one hand to, and...required to be in writing, by the statute of frauds. But the court mark the distinction broadly between such a case and a fa.se where an agent, who has... | |
| |
There is no doubt that where such an agreement is made, it is competent to show that one or both of the contracting parties were agents for other persons, and acted as such agents in making the contract, so as to give the benefit of the contract on the... 
