...interferes with the attending physician's medical judgment in a manner not contemplated by the Congress. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is therefore reversed, and the case is remanded for consideration of this requirement. It is so ordered. MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, with whom MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL...

...refused to consider such a showing as a sufficient reason for withholding certain information. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is therefore reversed, and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. So ordered. JUSTICE BLACKMUN, with...

...Rose v. Diction, 327 F. 2d 27, 29 (CA9 1964) ; Morris v. Mayo, 277 F. 2d 103 (CAS 1960). The'judgment of the Court of Appeals is therefore reversed, and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS,...

...liability, but that the -trial court and not the jury should determine the amount of penalty, if any. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is therefore reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES...

...liability, but that the trial court and not the jury should determine the amount of penalty, if any. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is therefore reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. JUSTICE SCALIA, with whom JUSTICE...

...violation of the Extradition Treaty between the United States and Mexico, and therefore the rule of Ker v Illinois is fully applicable to this case. The fact...States for violations of the criminal laws of the [45< United States. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is therefore reversed, and the case is remanded...

...violation of the Extradition Treaty between the United States and Mexico, and therefore the rule of Ker v. Illinois is fully applicable to this case. The...United States. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is therefore reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion....

...Supreme Court of the United States held that the fact of Alvarez-Machain's forcible abduction did not "prohibit his trial in a court in the United States...violations of the criminal laws of the United States". 34 The majority focused on the question of whether the abduction violated the Extradition Treaty between...

...subjects to operate laundries in wooden buildings "under similar conditions."... (Citation omitted)... The judgment of the Court of Appeals is therefore reversed, and the case is remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. Having reviewed the requirements to prove...

...authorize judicial review of claims that agency action violates the United States Constitution. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is therefore reversed, and the case remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins 490 US 228...