 | Martin Griffiths - 1995 - 226 halaman
...society. Bull argues that world order: is more fundamental and primordial than international order because the ultimate units of the great society of all mankind...which groupings of them of this or that sort are not. This is the moment for international relations, but the question of world order arises whatever the... | |
 | B. A. Roberson - 2002 - 292 halaman
...Bull where he writes: 'World order is more fundamental and primordial than international order because the ultimate units of the great society of all mankind...classes or parties) but individual human beings.' 33 The fundamental point of international society is the good life of human beings on the planet as... | |
 | Barbara Allen Roberson - 1998 - 296 halaman
...morally prior to it ... 'world order' is more fundamental and primordial than international order because the ultimate units of the great society of all mankind...nations, tribes, empires, classes or parties) but are individual human beings ... it is necessary at this point to state that if any value attaches to... | |
 | John Hoffman - 1998 - 148 halaman
...primordial and morally prior than order among states, The 'ultimate units of the great society of al! mankind are not states (or nations, tribes, empires, classes or parties) but individual human beings'.25 This invocation of a 'morally prior' world order does imply that states cannot be accepted... | |
 | Andrew Linklater - 2000 - 384 halaman
...states. As Bull put it, World order is more fundamental and primordial than international order because the ultimate units of the great society of all mankind are not states . . . but individual human beings, which are permanent and indestructible in a sense in which groupings... | |
| |
... (p. 20). These are the constitutive goals of social life on a global scale, excluding the specific goals of international society. Bull argues that world order: is more fundamental and primordial than international order because the ultimate units... 