 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1982 - 1050 halaman
...Rep. 1193 (1854). In Comyns' Digest, at 442, the rule was broadly stated: "So, in every case, where a statute enacts, or prohibits a thing for the benefit...for the thing enacted for his advantage, or for the recompence of a wrong done to him contrary to the said law." 4 As Justice Frankfurter stated in dissent... | |
 | Sir John Comyns - 1824 - 840 halaman
...an action in his name alone, as well as by qui tain Д-с. 2 Inst. 200. So, in every case, where a statute enacts, or prohibits a thing for the benefit...for the thing enacted for his advantage, or for the recompence of a wrong done to him contrary to the said law. Per Holt, Mod. Ca. 26, 7. An action by... | |
 | Nathan Dane - 1824 - 764 halaman
...every case, where a Per Holt, though it do not give any express penally or forfeiture, he may D. 318. statute enacts, or prohibits a thing for the benefit of a person, he shall have a remedy upon the statute, for the thing enacted for his advantage, or for the recompense of the wrong done to him, contrary... | |
 | 1872 - 978 halaman
...such an order it is laid down in Comyn'g Digest Action upon Statute (F) — " So in every case where a statute enacts or prohibits a thing for the benefit...for the thing enacted for his advantage or for the recompence of a wrong done to him contrary to the said law." This rule, therefore, should be made absolute.... | |
 | Edmund Hatch Bennett, Chauncey Smith - 1855 - 688 halaman
...Inst. 486; and in Com. Dig. tit. "Action upon Statute," F, it is l»id down that "in every case where a statute enacts or prohibits a thing for the benefit...of a wrong done to him contrary to the said law." Therefore, the simple enactment requiring the supply of medicines would have entitled the plaintiff... | |
 | Theodore Sedgwick - 1857 - 774 halaman
...parliament, — " Omnia pradicta statuta." See 2d Inst. 486. And the general rule, that in every case where a statute enacts or prohibits a thing for the benefit...recompense of a wrong done to him contrary to the law in question, is declared by the text-writers of our jurisprudence.* If a new right is created by... | |
 | South Australia. Supreme Court - 1871 - 194 halaman
...disS.PKKME CO.KT. charging the payee. In 1 Comyn's Digest (F) it is laid down — " So in every case when a Statute enacts or prohibits a thing for the benefit...of a wrong done to him contrary to the said law." In our opinion, however, the plaintiff is not within the principle above enunciated. To whom did the... | |
 | Great Britain. Courts - 1872 - 672 halaman
...Inst. 486. And in Com. Dig. Action upon Statute, (F), it is laid down that, " in every case where a statute enacts or prohibits a thing for the benefit...of a wrong done to him contrary to the said law." Therefore the simple enactment requiring the supply of medicines would have entitled the plaintiff... | |
 | 1872 - 536 halaman
...Inst. 486). And in Com. Dig., ' Action upon Statute' (F), it is laid down that in every case where a statute enacts or prohibits a thing for the benefit...remedy upon the same statute, for the thing enacted to his advantage, or for the recompense of a wrong done to him contrary to the said law.' Therefore... | |
| |
So, in every case, where a statute enacts, or prohibits a thing for the benefit of a person, he shall have a remedy upon the same statute for the thing enacted for his advantage, or for the recompense of a wrong done to him contrary to the said law. 
