...having jurisdiction of the question, must be taken as beyond controversy. The principle is this ; " When private property is devoted to a public use, it is subject to public regulations." And this is more especially true, when the owner has either a legal or a virtual monopoly...

...the United States supreme court, reiterated a well founded Opinion, per HOUGH, J. principle, to-wit: "When private property is devoted to a public use, it is subject to public regulation." In AHnutt v. Inglis, 12 East, 527, Lord Ellenborough said: "There is no doubt that the general principle...

...who takes the benefit of a monopoly. Mr. Chief Justice Waite referring to the public-use basis said: "When private property is devoted to a public use it is subject to public regulation." That monopolies and contracts and agreements directly producing restraints in trade (8) Mayor of Mobile...

...for the common good, to the extent of the interest he has thus created'' * * * " But we need not go further. Enough has already been said to show that...to a public use it is subject to public regulation. It remains only to ascertain whether the warehouses of these plaintiffs in error, and the business...

...interest" within the meaning of the doctrine which Lord Hale has so forcibly stated. But we need not go further. Enough has already been said to show that...to a public use it is subject to public regulation. It remains only to ascertain whether the warehouses of these plaintiffs in error and the business which...

...principle which supports the legislation they were examining, the opinion continues as follows: " Knough has already been said to show that when private property...to a public use it is subject to public regulation. It remains only to ascertain whether the warehouses of these plaintiffs in error and the business which...

...doctrine which Lord Hale has so forcibly stated. But we need not go further. Enough has already been eaid to show that when private property is devoted to a public use it is subject to public regulation. It remains only to ascertain whether the warehouses of these plaintiffs iu error, and the business...

...interest," within the meaning of the doctrine which Lord Hale has so forcibly stated. But we need not go further. Enough has already been said to show that,...a public use, it is subject to public regulation. It remains only to ascertain whether the warehouses of these plaintiffs in error, and the business...

...regulation rests, with references to English authorities. " Enough has been already said," continued he, " to show that, when private property is devoted to a public use, it is subject to public regulation." Do the warehouses of plaintiffs in error come within the operation of this principle? It was held they...

...Otto. 113, the doctrine was applied to elevators and warehouses, and the broad principle was declared "When private property is devoted to a public use, it is subject to public regulation." And the right to fix rates for elevating and storing grain, was declared to be the same right always...