Apa yang dikatakan orang - Tulis resensi
Kami tak menemukan resensi di tempat biasanya.
Edisi yang lain - Lihat semua
accept according action agreed agreement alleged amount answer appears applied assigned authority averred award Bank bill bond bound breach brought building cargo cause circumstances cited claim complete condition consideration considered contract court covenant creditors damages debt decided decision deed defendant defendant's delivered delivery discharge effect entered entitled evidence executed express fact further give given ground held illegal intention interest judge judgment jury land Lord Mass matter means ment months necessary notice objection obligation offered opinion paid particular parties payment performance person plaintiff plea pleaded precedent present principle promise purchase question ready reason receive recover referred refused release Reported respect rule satisfaction ship statute stipulation sufficient suit taken tender thing tion trade trial void whole
Halaman 497 - No court will lend its aid to a man who founds his cause of action upon an immoral or an illegal act. If, from the plaintiff's own stating or otherwise, the cause of action appears to arise ex turpi causa, or the transgression of a positive law of this country, there the Court says he has no right to be assisted. It is upon that ground the Court goes; not for the sake of the defendant, but because they will not lend their aid to such a plaintiff.
Halaman 77 - ... in the absence of any express or implied warranty that the thing shall exist, the contract is not to be construed as a positive contract, but as subject to an implied condition that the parties shall be excused in case, before breach, performance becomes impossible from the perishing of the thing without default of the contractor.
Halaman 394 - Viet. c. 109, s. 18, it is enacted, that all contracts or agreements, whether by parol or in writing, by way of gaming or wagering, shall be null and void ; and that no suit shall be brought or maintained in any court of law or equity for recovering any sum of money or valuable thing alleged to be won upon any wager, or which shall have been deposited in the hands of any person to abide the event on which any wager shall have been made...
Halaman 270 - The promisee, if he pleases, may treat the notice of intention as inoperative, and await the time when the contract is to be executed, and then hold the other party responsible for all the consequences of non-performance ; but in that case he keeps the contract alive for the benefit of the other party as well as his own.
Halaman 4 - If a day be appointed for payment of money or part of it, or for doing any other act, and the day is to happen or may happen before the thing which is the consideration of the money or other act is to be performed, an action may be brought for the money, or for not doing such other act before performance ; for it appears that the party relied upon his remedy, and did not intend " to make the performance a condition precedent...
Halaman 114 - When no such independent circumstances are referred to, and the engagement is to furnish goods of a certain quality or character to a certain amount, the quantity specified is material, and governs the contract. The addition of the qualifying words 'about,
Halaman 497 - ... <The objection, that a contract is immoral or illegal as between plaintiff and defendant, sounds at all times very ill in the mouth of the defendant. It is not for his sake, however, that the objection is ever allowed; but it is founded in general principles of policy, which the defendant has the advantage of, contrary to the real justice, as between him and the plaintiff, by accident, if I may so say. The principle of public policy is this; ex dolo malo non oritur actio.
Halaman 215 - Court erred in charging that the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the market price at...
Halaman 373 - ... of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party, can be of no benefit to either. It can only be oppressive, and if oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law unreasonable.