...reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses lo provide that certain designated subjects of inter-State commerce shall be governed by a rule which divests...case, it is not within its competency to do so. The differences of opinion which have existed in this tribunal in many leading oases upon this subject...

...held that the effect of the Wilson act was to "divest them [objects of Inter-state commerce shipments] of that character at an earlier period of time than would otherwise be the case," to wit, after the object had 'reached Its destination. It fell under the control of state legislation,...

...No.reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate commerce shall be governed by a rule which divests...case, it is not within its competency to do so. The differences of opinion which have existed in this tribunal in many leading cases upon this subject,...

...reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate commerce shall be governed by a rule which divests...case, it is not within its competency to do so. The differences of opinion which have existed in this tribunal in many leading cases upon this subject,...

...could see no reason why if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate commerce shall be governed by a rule which divests...case it is not within its competency to do so. The differences of opinion which have arisen in the court upon this subject have been not from a denial...

...was ruled that the same power of Congress may provide that certain designated subjects of interstate commerce shall be governed by a rule which divests them of that character at an earlier time than would otherwise be the case. " Liquors transported into Kansas fell at once upon arrival...

...reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate commerce shall be governed by a rule which divests...the case, it is not within its competency to do so. As early as the decision of Brown v. Maryland (12 Wheat. , 419 ; 6 L. ed. , 678), it was held that...

...JSahrer, 140 US 545, 552, that the act of Congress "divests them (objects of interstate commerce shipment) of that character at an earlier period of time than would otherwise be the case." We think that interpreting the statute by the light of all its provisions, it was not intended to and...

...Rahrer, 140 US 545, 552, that the act of Congress "divests them (objects of interstate commerce shipment) of that character at an earlier period of time than would otherwise be the case." We think that interpreting the statute by the light of all its provisions, it was not intended to and...

...reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate commerce shall be governed by a rule which divests...case, it is not within its competency to do so." The act of Congress is valid. The original laws of Kansas became operative in respect to imported packages...