| United States. Supreme Court - 1947 - 978 halaman
...because they arise from a different state of the law. The ultimate test in the Bridges case requires that the 'substantive evil must be extremely serious...extremely high before utterances can be punished.' Even if this test is to [be] the rule in the State Courts, they 331 Opinion of the Court. Cases were... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1947 - 978 halaman
...because they arise from a different state of the law. The ultimate test in the Bridges case requires that the 'substantive evil must be extremely serious...extremely high before utterances can be punished.' Even if this test is to [be] the rule in the State Courts, they 331 Opinion of the Court. Cases were... | |
| United States. Congress. House Un-American Activities Committee - 1948 - 30 halaman
...States, 219 US 47, 52. " West Virginia State Board ofEdutation v. Bnrnette, supra note 11 , at 633. "What finally emerges from the 'clear and present...extremely high before utterances can be punished." Bridges v. California, 314 US 252, 263. 33 Busey v. District of Columbia, supra note 7, at 192. " Thomas... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1948 - 538 halaman
...247, 63 L. Ed. 470; Hartzel v. United States, 322 US 680, 64 S. Ct. 1233, 88 L. Ed. 1534). Ordinarily 'the substantive evil must be extremely serious and the degree of imminence extremely high' in order to warrant punishment for the exercise of speech, press, or assembly. (Bridges v. California,... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1948 - 522 halaman
...247, 63 L. Ed. 470; Hartzel v. United States, 322 US 680, 64 S. Ct. 1233, 88 L. Ed. 1534). Ordinarily 'the substantive evil must be extremely serious and the degree of imminence extremely high' in order to warrant punishment for the exercise of speech, press, or assembly. (Bridoes v. California,... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1949 - 262 halaman
...are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils the Congress...interests, give occasion for permissible limitation. I do not find that either of these attempts to meet or comply with these standards. In the Eightieth... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1949 - 994 halaman
...evils of sufficient weight to warrant the curtailment of liberty of expression. Schneider v. State .... "What finally emerges from the 'clear and present...extremely high before utterances can be punished." This formulation of the "clear-and-present-danger" test was quoted and endorsed in Pennekamp v. Florida,... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1949 - 306 halaman
...247, 63 L. Ed 470) ; Hartiel v. United States (322 US 680, 64 S. Ct. 1233, 88 L. Ed. 1534). Ordinarily 'the substantive evil must be extremely serious and the degree of imminence extremely high' in order to warrant punishment for the exercise of speech, press, or assembly. Bridges v. California... | |
| |