 | United States. Supreme Court - 1958 - 876 halaman
...distinct and profound exercise of discretion. See Work v. Rives, 267 US 175, 183; Wilbur v. Kadrie, 281 US 206, 219; United States ex rel. Chicago Great...judgment requiring close analysis and nice choices. Peti309 Opinion of the Court. tioner is not only agent for the President but a creature of Congress.... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Agriculture and Forestry Committee - 1959 - 236 halaman
...illustration of what Mr. Justice Douglas meant, when in the Panama Canal Co. case, supra, he said : "We then must infer that the decision to act or not...agency burdened with the responsibility for decision." Further in this connection, we have the previously noted legislative history revealing the intent of... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Merchant Marine and Fisheries - 1960 - 140 halaman
...distinct and profound exercise of discretion. See Work v. Rives, 267 US 175, 183; Wilbur v. Kadrie, 281 US 206, 219; United States ex rel. Chicago Great...with the responsibility for decision. We think this ease is in that area. The petitioner, as agent of the President,, is given questions of judgment requiring... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Merchant Marine and Fisheries - 1961 - 754 halaman
...statutory terms, the very construction of the statute is a distinct and profound exercise of discretion. We then must infer that the decision to act or not...agency burdened with the responsibility for decision." Grace Line v. Panama Canal Co.. 356 US 309, 318. (Citations omitted.) PANAMA LINK ESSENTIAL TO SUPPORT... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries - 1961 - 760 halaman
...statutory terms, the very construction of the statute Is a distinct and profound exercise of discretion. We then must Infer that the decision to act or not...agency burdened with the responsibility for decision." Grace Line v. Panama Canal Co.. 356 US 309, 318. (Citations omitted.) PANAMA LINE ESSENTIAL TO SUPPORT... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Select Committee on Small Business - 1964 - 384 halaman
...distinct and profound exercise of discretion. See Work v. Rives, 267 US 175, 183; Wilbur v. Kadrie, 281 US 206, 219; United States ex rel. Chicago Great...agency burdened with the responsibility for decision" (356 US 318). Clearly Presidential Proclamation 3279, as amended, authorizes the Secretary -of Interior... | |
| |
But where the duty to act turns on matters of doubtful or highly debatable inference from large or loose statutory terms, the very construction of the statute is a distinct and profound exercise of discretion. 
