Gambar halaman




.204, 209

.581, 590

347, 354

I 20

Merchants Nat. Bk. of Cincin Nugen ads. McDonald...

214 nati v. Ryan..

419 Merkel ads. Haber..

593 O'Brien ads. People ex rel. Merton v. Obrien et al. 498 Lewisohn...

421, 590 Met, L. Ins. Co. ads. Beglin... 283 Obrien et Merton. 498 Middeke et al. 71. Balder et al., 122 O'Loughlin ads. Texas Cent. Miller ads. Blackstone.

360 R. Co.... Minnick ads. Daily 59 Oppenheimer v. Levi...

357 Mitchell ads. Prince George's Orman v. Salvo....

.49, 62 Co. Com’rs...


Ozboda ads. People..
Mittenthal et al. v. Mascagni.. 418
Monnier v. R. R. 578, 587 Pannaci ads. Murray.

212 Moayon v. Moayon.


Parish ads. Hamilton G. & C.
Moody ads. Bacon.

Trac. Co.

286 Moore ads. State.

60 Parker & Co. ads. Ætna L. Moran v. Morrill. 354 Ins. Co.....

422 Moreland's Admr. v. Citizens Patton ads. State.

420 Sav. Bk... 285 Paul v. Fargo.

.479, 498 Morrill ads. Moran.

354 Peck Williamson H. & U. Co. Morrow v. Pullman Co... 586 V. Steen School Township, Moses, Appeal of.


496 Muhlker v. N. Y. & H. R. R. Penn. R. Co. ads. Bailey 417 Co.....

Penn. R. Co. ads. Naylor.. 417 Murphey ads. Cent. of Ga.R.Co. 279 | People v. American L. & T. Murphy v. Curry.

.51, 58

Co... Murphy v. Sampson. 592 People v. Dupounce.

493 Murphy ads. Supreme Council. 591 People v. Green..

587 Murray v. Northwestern R. Co. 121 People v. Law & Order Club.. 495 Murray v. Pannaci...... 212 People v. Martin...

209 Muskegon Co. ads. Wilson. 497 People v. Ozboda. Mut. Fire Assn, et al. ads. People v. Pierson..

.585, 589 Boyd...... ..487, 493 People v. Pratt..

494 Mut. Reserve L. Assn. ads. People v. Barrett..

589 Magoffin....

124 People ex rel. Corkran

60 Naylor v. Penn. R. Co...... 417 People ex rel. Lewisohn v. Neall v. U. S 281 O'Brien.

.421, 590 Nebraska Moline Plow Co. ads. People ex rel. Met. St. R. Co. Logan

119 v. State Bd. Tax Com's..267, Nevitt, Inre.. .45, 58

287, 426 New Jersey Zinc Co. ads. Buck 211 People v. Wells...

593 New York & H. R. R. Co. ads. Percival v. Wright.. Muhlker.

Perkins ads. Castle.

125 New York, N. H. & H. R. Co. Pepetual Trustee Co. ads. ads. Daniels


. 407, 426 N. Y. etc. R. R. Co. ads. Lev. Peterson ads. McGowan.... 21I ins...

Phillio ads. H. & T. C. R. Co. New York, City of v. Baird.

588 New York, City of ads. Pierson ads. People.. ...585, 589 Barney

.413, 421

Pim ads. Warren...
No. Pacif. R. Co. ads. State Placer Co. Bk. ads. Pullen....

Poillon v. Poillon et al.... 420 Northern Securities Co. ads. Polsdorfer ads. Ayers.

285 State ... 493 Potter ads. Rainey..

585 Northern Securities Co. et al. Potts v. Dounce...

359 ads. U.S..... 404, 419 | Pouppirt v. Elder, Dempster, Northwestern R. Co. ads. Mur

etc., Co...

490 ray ..... I21 Powell v. McGlynn..


.204, 209


I 20

.347, 354


115, 119

.482, 493


485, 491

[blocks in formation]

In re..

.488, 491

108, 123

204, 209


.576, 592

Pratt ads. People..... 494 | Shoyer v. Smith..

355 Prince George's Co. Comr's. v. Sims, In re

208 Mitchell.. 492 Slater v. Slater..

496 Protected etc. ads. Shipman... 591 Slingsby, The...

496 Prudential Ins. Co. ads. Ro Smart, In re, goods of.

125 botham.....

.275, 281
Smith ads. Shoyer.

355 Pullen v. l'lacer Co. Bk... 285 Smythe v. U. S...

354 Pullman Co, ads. Morrow.. 586 So. Ry. Co. v. Ensign Mfg. Co. Pungs ads. Anderson Carriage

111, 121 Co.. 592 Spengler v. Spengler.


St. Paul & K. C. Grain Co.,
R. R. ads. Monnier. .578, 587
Rainey v. Potter..

585 St. Regis Paper Co. v. Santa
Ranit v. Reimers.
210 Clara Lumber Co..

282 Ray ads. State... . 202, 211 Starbuck v. Starbuck.

356 Readman Wareh. Co. ad's. State v. Ellsworth et al..

I 21 Windell.. 281 State ads. Gage.

587 Reid ads. Byrne

State v. Hood.. Reilly ads. Jones. 421 State v. Hyatt..

282 Reimers ads. Ranft.

210 State v. Moore.. Reulund v. Commodore Min. State v. No. Pacif. R. Co...485, 491 Co......

497 State v. Northern Securities Co. 493 Reynolds v. Ashby & Son.. 359 State v. Patton...

420 Richards, ex parte.. 420 State v. Ray

202, 211 Rif v. Riibe...

.576, 592

State Bd. Tax Coms, ads. P. ex Riibe ads. Rüf..

rel. Met. St. R. Co. 267, 287, 426 Rimmer v. Webster.

57 Stecher Litho, Co. v. Inman Roberts, In re... 361 et al...

494 Robotham V. Prudential Ins. Steen School Township, etc., Co.......

.275, 281 ads. Peck Williamson H. & Rockefeller ads. Corrigan..

V. Co..

496 Rogers v. Man. Ins. Co...351, 358 Steinhardt ads. Alexander.581, 590 Ross v. Bd. Chosen Freeholders Steuer ads. Boston S. & I. Co.. 424 et al....

Stikeman v. Flack....

490 Rowson v. Atl. Transp. Co... 417 Stillwater Water Co. v. Farmer. 425 Rowe ads. Corp. of Truro... 213 Stone v. City of Seattle...

62 Ryan ads. Merchants' Nat. Bk. Summerfield ads. Davis, ...274, 286 of Cincinnati....

419 Supreme Council v. Murphy.... 591

Sutherland v. Mead et al....... 423
Salvo ads. Orman ... .49, 62
Sammis ads. Wales...

Talbot ads. Bashensky.

279 Sampson ads. Murphy.

592 Taylor v. Hotchkiss.. Santa Clara Lumber Co, ads.


I 22 Taylor, In re....

282 St. Regis Paper Co...

Texas Cent. R. Co. v. O'LaughSantaquin Min. Co. v. High

lin.... Roller Min. Co...... 276, 286

Thomas ads. Jones.

211 Saunders ads. Grant..

Todd et al. ads. Bd. Supvsrs. Sawyer v. Commonwealth. 112, 121

Election, etc...

492 Schmaelzle v, L. & L. F. Ins.

Troutman et al, v. De Boissiere,
Co. et al...

etc., Assn...

269, 287

62 Seattle, City of, ads. Stone....

Truro, Corp. of, v. Rowe.. 213 Servis v. Servis..


Trust Co., Appeal of..

286 Severson ads. Greer. Shachter, In re..

Tucker ads. Gillette.

287 Shanley v. Koehler.

419 Sheffield Corp. v. Barclay.


U. R. Co. ads. Garrison.. 578 Shillito v. Biggert.

591 U. S. ads. 581 Diamonds. 360 Shipman v. Protected, etc. 591 U. S. ads. Neal..





.581, 590

.348, 359

[blocks in formation]


411, 423


U.S. v. Northern Securities Co. Washbond ads. Beers....

586 et al...

....404, 419

Washburn ads. Lawrence. U. S. ads. Smythe.

354 Weaver ads. Wanamaker. 589 U. S. Steel Corp. ads. Berger.. 59

Webster ads. Rimmer.

57 Uhlein v. Matthews..

63 Weil ads. Bloomingdale. 57 Union Cent. L. Ins. Co. ans. Wells ads. People

593 Burt....

248 White ads. Alden.. United Press v. Abell Co.. 356 Whitridge ads. Doyle..

593 Uvalde Nat. Bk. ads. W. U. Tel. Williams v. Crabb....

60 Co.......

426 | Williams ads. Gorman..

Wilson v. Muskegon Co... 497 Va., Com. of, v. DeHart...


Windell V. Readman Wareh. Van Praagh v. Everidge.. 56


281 Vanderbilt, Matter of...

64 Winn v. Wabash R. Co... 208 Varick Bank, In re

208 Winterfield ads. Koepke... Veazey v. Allen.. 281 Wise v. Perpetual Trustee Co..

407, 426 Wabash R. Co. ads. Feil...... 286 Wright ads. Percival...

I 20 Wabash R. Co. ads. Winn.... 208 Wyckoff, Seamans & Benedict Waldron ads. Crane.

v. Howe Scale Co....

494 Wales v. Sammis...

498W. U. Tel. Co. v. Uvalde Nat. Wanamaker v. Weaver. 589

Warren v. Pim.....
Wart v. Wart.
60 Zeltner v, Zeltner....




482, 493

An Important New Work for Law Schools and Law Students.


Negotiable Instruments


Author of “Daniel on Negotiable Instruments."



of the Bar of the District of Columbia, and Professor of the Law of

Negotiable Instruments in Georgetown (D. C.) University,

Price in law canvas, $3.00 Net, or $3.25 delivered; in sheep,

$3.50 Net, or $3.75 delivered.

[ocr errors]


'HIS WORK is designed primarily for the use of law students and instructors in

law schools. It is based upon the well-known and popular work of “ Daniel on Negotiable Instruments,” and the lectures upon the subject by Professor Douglass after eight years' experience as instructor in the law of Negotiable Instruments in the law school of the Georgetown (D. C.) University.

So much of the standard work by Senator Daniel as would be appropriate to a student's book has been used, but the subject-matter has been rearranged and transposed, and new matter added. Everything has been done that seemed to the authors necessary to make the subject both intelligible and attractive.

Especial care has been taken to regulate and apportion the space devoted to the many sub-subjects as their relative importance, from the standpoint of the student, requires. It is believed that in this respect this work differs materially from, and is superior to, most, if not all, other student's books on this subject.

One of the special features of the book is the orderly and logical sequence of discussion. The work is divided into five books, and the subjects taken up in logical and chronological order. As the system and classification constitute nearly half of the battle with the law student in mastering any given subject, unusual attention has been given to this in the structure and arrangement of this new book.

The student, in this new work, is vouchsafed the substantial benefits, on the one hand, of the point of view and professional experience of the lawyer-author, and, on the other, of the lecturer's practical appreciation of the usual difficulties attendant upon the study of the law.

The full text of the important new statute, “The Negotiable Instruments Law,” which has become law in nineteen States, and also in the Territory of Arizona and District of Columbia, is given in an Appendix.

BAKER, VOORHIS & CO., Law Publishers, For Sale by all Law Booksellers.

66 Nassau Street, New York.

« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »