Edinburgh, Perth and Dundee Railway 2 Macq. 514 Company . Philip Edwards v. Baugh Edwards v. Ronald 4 E. & B. 963 - 930 - 564 - 430 - 377 455 - 304 16 M. & W. 119 6 E. & B. 192 - 305 348 13 How. St. Tr. 538 2 Scott. N. R. 229; 1 Man. & Gr. 987 324 - 379 - 479 12 C. B. 762 - 327 - 216 2 W. Bl. 1078 - 590 - 564 - 285 8 Bing. 124 - 883 Garton v. Bristol and Exeter Railway 6 C. B. N. S. 639 - 147 Hackney and Lamberhurst Tithe Com-} E. B. & E. 1 mutation Rent Charges Case Hadley v. Baxendale 9 Exch. 341 Hains, alias Haines, v. Jeffell, alias Jes-1 cott, Jefcott, Jeffreys Hall v. Janson Hamond v. Howell Hanscomb's Case 704. 718 - 590 Ld. Raym. 68; 5 Mod. 168; 451 2 Hale P. C. ch. 41. 295 - 485 5 M. & W. 60 - 951 v. Manchester and Salford Water- }5 B. & Ad. 866 xiv Page - 884 554 - 804 v. York, Newcastle and Ber-}5 Exch. 343 wick Railway Company Hyde v. Mayor of Manchester Lichfield, Mayor of, v. Simpson Linford v. Fitzroy Liverpool Adelphi Loan Association v.}9 Exch. 422 Fairhurst Livie v. Janson Livingstone v. Whiting London Grand Junction Railway Com-12 pany v. Freeman 12 East, 648 15 Q. B. 722 M. & G. 606; 2 Scott, N. R. S1 Bing, N. C. 222; 2 Cl. & F. 15 Q. B. 266 E. B. & E. 828; 5 Jur. N. S. 333 4 B. & A. 654 664 406 - 379 8 Q. B. 65 13 Q. B. 240 - 264 - 657 705 v. Graham 1 Q. B. 271 1 Campb. 22 5 B. & A. 117 3 C. B. N. S. 120 623 - 635 - 292 - 568 - 579 Metcalfe's Case Metropolitan Counties and General Life 4 H. & N. 428 Assurance Company v. Brown Middleton v. Crofts v. Melton Midgley v. Richardson Miller v. Miller Minter ats. Brett Moore v. Shepherd Moon v. Durden Morris v. Edgington 2 Atk. 650 11 Co. 38 - 476 - 819 - 449 Morton v. Tibbett - 303 - 429 - 766 Moses v. Macferlan Mountnoy v. Collier Mumford v. Commercial Insurance Com-5 Johns (U. S.) Rep. 262 pany Murray v. Mann - 49 1 E. & B. 630 2 Exch. 538 Parfitt v. Thompson 5 E. & B. 166 - 764 13 M. & W. 392 - 346 Parker v. Bristol and Exeter Railway}6 Exch. 702 Company pany v. Great Western Railway Com Peaceable d. Uncle v. Watson - 429 1}7 M. & Gr. 253 - 154 v. Huth Phillips v. Allan & Pickford . Grand Junction Railway}8 M. & W. 372 Company Pinnington v. Galland Poole v. Hill Pordage v. Cole Potts v. Cumbridge v. Hewett Priestley v. Fowler 4 Wend. 229 - 323 6 M. W. 572 - 833 8 E. & B. 847 17 C. B. 660 - 80 - 590 - 233 - 395 - 838 440. 803 - 451 - 579 |