Thatcher v. Gottlieb, 8 C. C. A. 334, 59
Fed. 872

Tyler v. Magwire, 17 Wall. 253, 21 L. Ed.
576

Turner v. Harvey, Jacob's Rep. 167, 177..
138, 141

174

174

Thayer v. Ass'n, 112 U. S. 717, 5 Sup.
Ct. 355, 28 L. Ed. 864.

802

Umbria, The, 166 U. S. 404, 17 Sup. Ct.
610, 41 L. Ed. 1053...

990

Thomas, In re (D. C.) 103 Fed. 272. Thomas v. Harvie's Heirs, 10 Wheat. 146, 6 L. Ed. 287.

77

....

Thomas v. Railroad Co. (C. C.) 37 Fed. 548

35

.732, 921

Thompson v. Allen Co., 115 U. S. 550, 6
Sup. Ct. 140, 29 L. Ed. 472.
Thompson v. Dean, 7 Wall. 342, 19 L. Ed.

94

993

205

Thompson v. Railroad Co., 170 Mass. 577, 49 N. E. 913, 40 L. R. A. 345, 64 Am. St. Rep. 323.

Underwood v. Gerber, 149 U. S. 224, 13
Sup. Ct. 854, 37 L. Ed. 710..
Union P. R. Co. v. Callaghan, 6 C. C.
A. 2, 5, 210, 56 Fed. 988, 993, 994..116, 117
Union P. R. R. v. McDonald, 152 U. S.
264, 14 Sup. Ct. 619, 38 L. Ed. 434..285, 287
Union P. R. Co. v. Railroad Co., 2 C. C.
A. 174. 51 Fed. 309; 4 C. C. A. 161, 54
Fed. 22, 163 U. S. 564, 16 Sup. Ct. 1173
41 L. Ed. 265..

512

14

Thompson v. The Republic, 23 Wall. 20,

23 L. Ed. 55.

710

Thompson v. Smith, 1 Dill. 458, Fed. Cas.

No. 13,977

62

Thompson v. Whitman, 18 Wall. 457, 21
L. Ed. 897..

U. S. v. Lumber Co., 29 C. C. A. 431, 85
Fed. 827

336

339

Thompson v. Young, 2 Ohio, 334.
Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Mfg. Co.,
41 C. C. A. 247, 101 Fed. 121......501, 509
Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Railroad
Co., 69 Fed. 257; 18 C. C. A. 145, 71
Fed. 396; 27 C. C. A. 419, 82 Fed. 461,
468; 30 C. C. A. 313, 86 Fed. 636..
501, 509, 510, 513
Thornton v. Society (Me.) 53 Atl. 979.
Tilghman v. Proctor, 125 U. S. 136, 8 Sup.
Ct. 894, 31 L. Ed. 664.
Tilghman v. Werk (C. C.) 39 Fed. 680..
Timlin v. Brown, 158 Pa. 606, 28 Atl. 236

879

U. S. v. Arredondo, 6 Pet. 691, 8 L. Ed.
547

693

U. S. v. Benjamin (C. C.) 72 Fed. 51..
U. S. v. Benzon, 2 Cliff. 512, Fed. Cas. No.
14,577

107

621

U. S. v. Black feather, 155 U. S. 180, 186, 15 Sup. Ct. 64, 39 L. Ed. 114.

172

U. S. v. Bonner, 1 Bald, 234, Fed. Cas.
No. 14,568

835

15

U. S. v. Brig Malik Adhel, 2 How. 209, 237, 11 L. Ed. 239.

732

U. S. v. Brooklyn (C. C.) 8 Fed. 473.
U. S. v. Budd, 144 U. S. 154, 12 Sup. Ct.
575, 36 L. Ed. 384.

127

398

U. S. v. Clark Co., 95 U. S. 769, 24 L. Ed.
545; 96 U. S. 211, 24 L. Ed. 628.
U. S. v. Coal Co., 137 U. S. 160, 11 Sup.
Ct. 57, 34 L. Ed. 640..

128

399

316

421 U. S. v. Cook, 17 Wall. 168, 21 L. Ed. 538 486 U. S. v. Craig (C. C.) 28 Fed. 799.

40

Toland v. Sprague, 12 Pet. 300, 327, 328, 9 L. Ed. 1093.

335

U. S. v. D'Auterive, 10 How. 609-623, 13
L. Ed. 560..

692

Tourville v. Railroad, 148 Mo. 614, 50 S.
W. 300, 71 Am. St. Rep. 650.
Tousey v. Roberts, 114 N. Y. 312, 21
E. 399, 11 Am. St. Rep. 655.

370

U. S. v. Express Co., 41 C. C. A. 240, 101
Fed. 111

106

N.

121

U. S. v. Ft. Scott, 99 U. S. 152, 159, 161, 25 L. Ed. 348...

131

Townsend v. Smith, 47 Wis. 623, 3 N. 439, 32 Am. Rep. 793

W.

266

U. S. v. Gaussen, 19 Wall. 198, 213, 22 L.
Ed. 41

175

Tracy v. Holcombe, 24 How. 426, 16
Ed. 742

L.

U. S. v. Gleason, 175 U. S. 588, 602, 20 205 Sup. Ct. 228, 233, 44 L. Ed. 284.

273

Traer v. Clews, 115 U. S. 528, 6 Sup.
155, 29 L. Ed. 467.

Ct.

U. S. v. Goodrich, 4 C. C. A. 160, 161, 567 54 Fed. 21. 22.

66

Trave, The (D. C.) 55 Fed. 117.

991

Trewatha v. Milling Co., 96 Cal. 494, 500,
28 Pac. 571, 31 Pac. 561.

U. S. v. Goodsell Co., 28 C. C. A. 453, 84
Fed. 439

620

121

Tripp v. Cook, 26 Wend. 143, 149..

140

.....

U. S. v. Griffith, 141 U. S. 212, 11 Sup. Ct. 1005, 35 L. Ed. 719.

965

452

800

355

xxxii

Page

Warner, The J. F. (D. C.) 22 Fed. 342.... 844
Warner v. Railroad Co., 168 U. S. 339, 348,
18 Sup. Ct. 68, 42 L. Ed. 491, 497...
Washington, etc., R. Co. v. Brown, 17
Wall. 445, 21 L. Ed. 675..
Watson v. Jones, 13 Wall. 674, 20 L. Ed.
666

Watson v. Mercer, 8 Pet. 110, 8 L. Ed. 876 623
Watson v. Sutherland, 5 Wall. 74, 18 L.
Ed. 580

Watts, In re, 23 Sup. Ct. 718, 47 L. Ed.

William Rogers Mfg. Co. v. Mfg. Co. (C.
C.) 11 Fed. 498.

613

82

352

Wayman v. Southard, 10 Wheat. 30, 6 L.
Ed. 253
Webb, The, 14 Wall. 406, 20 L. Ed. 774..
Weed v. Peterson, 12 Abb. Prac. N. S. 178
Weeks, In re (D. C.) 82 Fed. 729.
Wells, In re (D. C.) 105 Fed. 762.
Wells v. Graves (C. C.) 41 Fed. 459..
Welman's Case, 20 Vt. 653; Fed. Cas. No.
17,407

William Rogers Mfg. Co. v. Simpson, 54
Conn. 527, 9 Atl. 395..
Williams, In re, 123 Fed. 321.
Williams v. Ass'n (not reported).
Williams v. Morgan, 111 U. S. 684, 699,
4 Sup. Ct. 638, 28 L. Ed. 559..
Williams v. Railroad Co., 112 Mo. 468,
20 S. W. 631, 34 Am. St. Rep. 403.
Williams v. Theobald (D. C.) 15 Fed. 465 939
Wilson v. Fridenberg, 21 Fla. 386..
Wilson v. Milliken, 103 Ky. 165, 44 S. W.

613

406

94

730, 733

273

936

456

660

356

241

Wilson v. Township, 151 U. S. 64, 14 Sup.
Ct. 259, 38 L. Ed. 70.

802

690

Wertheimer v. U. S., 5 C. C. A. 107, 55
Fed. 281; 65 Fed. 186....

Winder v. Caldwell, 14 How. 434, 443, 14
L. Ed. 487.

333

1014

West Co. v. Lea, 174 U. S. 590, 595, 19
Sup. Ct. 836, 43 L. Ed. 1098.

758, 759

Winn v. Railroad (C. C.) 118 Fed. 55.
Wiswall v. Sampson, 14 How. 52, 14 L.
Ed. 322

369

353

Western & A. R. R. v. Roberson, 9 C. C. A.
646, 653, 61 Fed. 592, 598, 599..
Western Union Tel. Co. v. Railroad Co.,
120 Fed. 981; 123 Fed. 33..

368

Wolf Creek Coal Co. v. Schultz, 71 Pa. 180 317
392
Wood v. Carpenter, 101 U. S. 135, 25 L.
Ed. 807

974

Westfall v. Shook, 5 Blatchf. 383, Fed.
Cas. No. 17,448.

621

Wood v. Maun, 1 Sumn. 506, 578, Fed.
Cas. No. 17,951; 2 Sumn. 334, Fed. Cas.
No. 17,953

..37, 256

Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v.

Mfg.

Wood v. Weimer, 104 U. S. 786, 792, 26

Co., 116 Fed. 641..

237

L. Ed. 779

732

West Mahanoy Tp. v. Watson, 112 Pa. 574, 3 Atl. 866..

Wood v. Wood, 78 Ky. 624.

266, 267

122

West Massachusetts Fire Ins. Co. v. Storage Co., 6 Pa. Super. Ct. 288.

Woodruff v. Cheeves, 44 C. C. A.
105 Fed. 601

631,

456

264

Whalen v. Gordon, 37 C. C. A. 70, 78, 95
Fed. 305, 312.

199

Wharton v. Stoutenburgh, 46 N. J. Law, 151

Woods v. Morrell, 1 Johns. Ch. 103.
Wooster v. Blake (C. C.) 7 Fed. 816.
Worden v. Syrup Co., 187 U. S. 516, 23
Sup. Ct. 161, 47 L. Ed. 282.

256

142

613

316

White, In re, 5 C. C. A. 29, 55 Fed. 54.
White v. Arthur (C. C.) 10 Fed. 80.
White v. Dunbar, 119 U. S. 47, 7 Sup. Ct.
72, 30 L. Ed. 303.

484

Work v. Leathers, 97 U. S. 379, 24 L. Ed. 1012

52

694

Wormley v. Wormley, 8 Wheat. 450, 451, 5 L. Ed. 651..

.311, 802

490

White v. Floyd, Speer, Eq. 351, 355.
White v. Railroad Co., 61 Wis. 536, 541,
21 N. W. 524, 50 Am. Rep. 154.
White v. Wilson, 6 Blackf. 448, 39 Am.
Dec. 437

140

Worthington v. Waring, 157 Mass. 421, 32
N. E. 744, 20 L. R. A. 342, 34 Am. St.
Rep. 294

250

143

Wotton v. U. S. (C. C.) 84 Fed. 954; G. A. 4053

298

569

Whiting v. Bank, 13 Pet. 6, 10 L. Ed. 33
35, 205
Whitman v. Hubbell (C. C.) 30 Fed. 81... 811
W. H. Simpson, The, 25 C. C. A. 318, 80
653, 671
Fed. 153
Wichita Sav. Bank v. Atchison, etc., Co.,
20 Kan. 519
Wickliffe v. Buckman, 12 B. Mon. 424, 425
Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Railroad Co., 142
U. S. 396, 413, 416, 12 Sup. Ct. 188, 35
L. Ed. 1055.
Wilkinson v. Dodd, 42 N. J. Eq. 234, 244,
7 Atl. 327, 332.

Wottrich v. Freeman, 71 N. Y. 601
71
Wright v. Yuengling, 155 U. S. 47, 15 Sup.
Ct. 1, 39 L. Ed. 64.
Wyckoff v. Scale Co. (C. C.) 110 Fed. 520 613
Yeatman v. Savings Inst., 95 U. S. 764, 24
L. Ed. 589

833

970

943

173

522, 80 Fed. 417, 421. Zimmerman v. So Relle, 25 C. C. A. 518,

142

967

Zinn v. Baxter, 65 Ohio St. 341, 62 N.
E. 327

242

256

Zorkowski v. Astor, 156 N. Y. 393, 50 N.
E. 983

560

CASES

ARGUED AND DETERMINED

IN THE

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURTS OF APPEALS AND THE CIRCUIT AND DISTRICT COURTS.

THE GERMANIC.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. July 1, 1903.)

Nos. 151, 152.

1. SHIPPING-INJURY TO CARGO-HARTER ACT

The trend of judicial decision in the United States has been to construe the Harter act strictly, and not to extend the carrier's exemption from liability to doubtful and uncertain cases, but to leave such liability as it was defined and enforced by the law maritime and by the common law, unless the act plainly and unequivocally asserts a different liability.

2 SAME-SINKING OF VESSEL AT DOCK-NEGLIGENT UNLOADING.

The unloading of cargo in the port of discharge by stevedores has no relation to the "management of the vessel," within the meaning of the third section of the Harter act (Act Feb. 13, 1893, c. 105, 27 Stat. 445 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2946]), not being an act done with any view to such management, but relates to the "care or delivery of cargo," within the meaning of the first section; and where by the negligent and improper manner in which it was done it brought about a condition of instability in a ship, which, owing to a large accumulation of ice above her upper deck, rendered her top-heavy, and she rolled over and sank at her dock, injuring the remaining cargo, she is liable for the damage, although other acts done or omitted in the management of the vessel may have contributed to the injury.

Wallace, Circuit Judge, dissenting.

Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

For opinion below, see 107 Fed. 294.

On appeal from a decree of the District Court of the Southern District of New York finding the Germanic in fault and awarding damages to libelants for loss of cargo due to the stranding of the steamer while lying at pier 45 North river, during the night of Monday, February 13, 1899.

1. Statutory exemption of shipowners from liability, see note to NordDeutscher Lloyd v. Insurance Co. of North America, 49 C. C. A. 11.

124 F.-1