Gambar halaman


In this Table each case which has the names of two parties is entered twice, – that is to say, under both names, - except where these are identical. Ejectment cases are entered a third time, under the name of the fictitious party. As regards cases in the notes, mere citations are generally omitted.

50 n.

195 n.

53 n. 146 n.



Page Allen, Darcy v. 15 Darcy v. Allen

15 Am. Ins. Co. v. Canter 350 Davis, Tennessee v.

316 Anonymous

11 Day v. Savadge Application of Senate 181 Den d. Bayard v. Singleton

78 Dennison, Commonwealth of Ken.

tucky v.

Dorrance, Vanhorne's Lessee v. 94
Draper, People v.

165 Bain, Wells r.

Dred Scott v. Sandford

354 n. Baker, United States v. 258


Dyke Board, K. v. Baltimore, Barney v.

350 n. Barney v. Baltimore

350 n. Bayard, Den d., r. Singleton

78 Bertholf v. O'Reilly

168 n.

E. Blacker, McPherson v.

158 n. Blake, Loughborough v. 349 n. | Eakin v. Raub

133 Bonham's Case 48 n. Ellzey, Hepburn v.

348 Borden, Luther v. 192, 254 Engelbrecht, Clinton v.

357 Bowman v. Middleton Bremen, Garbade v. Krieger v.

149 Byrne, Adm’rs of, v. Adm’rs of Stewart


Ferreira, United States v. 105 n., 160
Fletcher v. Peck


Fong Yue Ting v. United States 374 Callan v. Wilson


Forty-three Gallons, United States v. Campbell v. Hall

40 Canter, Am. Ins. Co. v. 350 Fredericks, Sproule v.

250 Caton, Commonwealth v. 55 Frierson, Collier v.

262 Cavendish, In the Matter of

12 Chic. & G. T. Ry. Co. r. Wellman 170 Chirac v. Chirac

373 n. Chisholm v. Georgia


G. Clinton v. Engelbrecht

357 Clymer, Norris 1.

145 n. Garbade v. Bremen Cohens v. Virginia

285 Geofroy v. Riggs Collier v. Frierson 262 Georgia, Chisholm v.

295 Commonwealth v. Caton 55 v. Stanton

201 Green v. 177 Gibbons v. Ogden

266, 269 v. Smith 155 n. Gillson, People v.

169 Commonwealth of Kentucky r. Den- Giozza v. Tiernan

158 n. nison 195 n. Godden v. Hales

29 Cooper v. Telfair 105 Gordon v. United States

188 Crowninshield, Sturges v. 268 | Green v. Commonwealth



373 n.

146 n. 373 n.

[blocks in formation]

Co. v.

354 n.

50 n. 354 n.



S. Lechmere, Winthrop r.

34 Livingston, North River Steamboat Sanborn, In re

187 266 Sandford, Dred Scott v. v. Van Ingen 266 Saunders, Ogden v'.

155 n. Loan Association v. Topeka

169 Savadge, Day v. Logan v. United States

313 Scott, Dred, v. Sandford Louisiana, Hans v. 293 Serè v. Pitot

349 New Hampshire 2.

302 n. Ship-Money, Case of Loughborough v. Blake 349 n Siebold, Er parte

326 Luther v. Borden 192, 254 Singleton, Den d. Bayard v.

78 Sinking Fund Cases

155 n. Smith, Commonwealth v.

155 n. M. Sproule r. Fredericks

250 Stanton, Georgia v.

201 McBride, State v. 263 State ». McBride

203 M'Culloch v. Maryland 271 v. Wheeler

103 McPherson v. Blacker

158 n. Stewart, Adm’rs of, Adm’rs of Byrne Madison, Marbury v. 107

154 Marbury v. Madison 107 | Sturges r. Crowninshield

208 Martin v. Hunter's Lessee

123 Suffolk Insurance Co., Williams v. 258 Maryland, M'Culloch v.

271 Middleton, Bowman v. Mississippi v. Johnson

T. Monopolies, Case of

15 Mormon Church v. United States 361 Tavlor r. Place

159 Munn v. Illinois 170 | Telfair, Cooper v.

105 Tennessee v. Davis

316 Texas, United States v.

310 N. v. White


Thorpe v. Rut. & Burl. R. R. Co. 157 Neagle, In re 335 Tiernan, Giozza v

158 n. New Hampshire, Louisiana v. 302 n. | Ting, Fong Yue, 2. United States 374

[ocr errors]

53 n.


Page 63

Todd's Case
Tonnage Tax Cases
Topeka, Loan Association v.
Trevett v. Weeden



United States v. Baker

v. Ferreira
Fong Yue Ting v.
v. Forty-three Gallons
Gordon v.
Jones v.
v. Kagama
Logan v.
Mormon Church v.
r. Old Settlers
v. Texas


105 n.
157 n. Waddington, Rutgers v.
169 Watkins v. Holman
73 Weeden, Trevett v.

Wellington et al., Pet'rs.
Wellman, Chic. & G. T. Ry. Co. v.
Wells v. Bain

Wheeler, State v.

258 | White v. Hart 105 n., 160

Texas v. 374 Williams, Houston v. 373 n. Williams v. Suffolk Insurance Co.

188 Wilson, Callan v.

361 Winter, N. 0. v.
363 n. Winthrop v. Lechimere

313 Woods's Appeal

361 191 n. 310


73 155 n.

170 228 163 259 302 184 258 358 350

31 239

105 n.


Van Ingen, Livingston v. Virginia, Cohens v.

Yale Todd's Case

266 285








[ocr errors]

A CONSTITUTION has been well defined as “ L'ensemble des institutions et des lois fondamentales, destinées à règler l'action de l'administration et de tous les citoyens.” It is often, as in England, an unwritten body of custom, though, since the assertion of the “ rights of man” which preceded the French Revolution, the written enactment of such fundamental principles has been not uncommon, as well on the European continent as in America. A written constitution usually contains provisions which make innovation less easy than in the case of customary constitutions, such as that of England, any part of which may be modified by an ordinary Act of Parliament.? - HOLLAND, Elem. Jurisp. (6th ed.) 323.

In every form of government (Toliteia) there are three departments (uópia), and in every form the wise law-giver must consider, what, in respect to each of these, is for its interest. If all is well with these, all must needs be well with it, and the differences between forms of government are differences in respect to these. Or these three, one is the part which deliberates (rò Boulevóuevov) 8 about public affairs; the second

1 Ahrens, Cours, iii. p. 380.

2 Ahrens, Cours, iii. p. 381. Mr. Bryce has suggested the use of the terms “rigid” and “flexible” to express this distinction. See Dicey, Law of the Constitution, p. 84, and Professor Dicey's own instructive and ingenious applications of the distinctions, 16. pp. 114-125.

3 The Greek legislature of the present day, a single chamber, is called The Boulè. - ED.

VOL. I. -1

« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »