CONSTITUTIONS. Colo. Const. Art. 2. § 25.... 173 Colo. Const. Art. 5, § 1..... 414 Colo. Coust. Art. 5. § 30.b47, 175 Colo. Const. Art. 6, § 1. .b47, 174 Colo. Const. Art. 10, 5..b30, 144 Colo. Const. Art. 14. § 7. .b47, 175 Colo. Const. Art. 14. 14.b47, 169 MILLS ANN. CODE. Mills Ann. Code, § 11...... 156 98 98 414 73 Mills Ann. Code, § 404...... 74 Mills Ann. Code, § 406..... 282 Mills Ann. Code, § 406a.... 80 Mills Ann. Code, § 406d.... 282 MILLS ANN. ST. VOL. I. 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 169.... 342 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 195.. 342 1 Mills Ann. Stat. 433.... 36 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 473... .131 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 491.... 360 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 508.... 342 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 855.... 73 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 855.... 414 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 970.... 73 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 1086.... 55 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 1089.... 495 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 1303... 13 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 1433.. 88 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 1553... 169 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 1556.. 14 100 414 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 1723.... 100 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 1724.... 101 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 1732.... 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 1973.... 154 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 2025.... 299 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 2547... 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 2556.... 414 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 2557.... 414 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 2583... 414 1 Mills Ann. Stat. § 2585.... 414 MILLS ANN. ST. VOL. 2. 2 Mills Ann. Stat. § 2552.... 286 2 Mills Ann. Stat. § 2590.... 87 2 Mills Ann. Stat. § 2794.... 314 2 Mills Ann. Stat. § 2907.... 360 2 Mills Ann. Stat. § 2935.... 479 2 Mills Ann. Stat. § 2962.... 479 2 Mills Ann. Stat. § 3766.... 144 2 Mills Ann. Stat. § 3839.b22, 115 2 Mills Ann. Stat. § 3841.b22, 116 2 Mills Ann. Stat. § 3894.... 68 2 Mills Ann. Stat. § 3901... 3 Mills Ann. Stat. § 2529.... 382 3 Mills Ann. Stat. § 2606.... 99 3 Mills Ann. Stat. § 2609.... 527 3 Mills Ann. Stat. § 2611.... 99 3 Mills Ann. Stat. § 2618a... 84 3 Mills Ann. Stat. § 2704d... b21 3 Mills Ann. Stat. § 2957.... 527 3 Mills Ann. Stat. § 3888.... 68 3 Mills Ann. Stat. § 3888.... 64 3 Mills Ann. Stat. § 3900.... 64 CODES. Code '77, § 227.. REVISED STATUTES, R. S. '68, pp. 91-102... § 234. SESSION LAWS. 414 414 23 35 414 68 59 2 Mills Ann. Stat. § 3953. 2 Mills Ann. Stat. § 3989... 2 Mills Ann. Stat. § 4369. 2 Mills Ann. Stat. 4373.... 23 2 Mills Ann. Stat. § 4373.... 2 Mills Ann. Stat. § 4375... MILLS ANN. ST. VOL. 3. 48 24 REPORTS OF THE DECISIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. September Term, 1901. [Nos. 4382 and 4405.] THE PEOPLE EX REL. ADAMS ET AL. V. THE DISTRICT COURT OF ARAPAHOE COUNTY AND PALMER, JUDGE. I. PROHIBITION. The writ of prohibition is not one of right. It may issue in extraordinary cases in the exercise of a sound discretion of the court to which the application therefor is addressed, but never where the ordi nary remedies by law are applicable and adequate. Neither should it be permitted to supersede the ordinary functions of an appeal or writ of error. Where a party who has been convicted before a police magistrate and in the county court of violating a city ordinance from which conviction he has taken the case on error to the supreme court, and pending the appeal he applied for and obtained an injunction from the district court restraining the municipal authorities from enforcing the ordinance against him on the ground that it is unconstitutional, which judgment of the district court was removed to the supreme court by the municipal authorities for review, the supreme court will not upon appliVol 29-1 (1) cation of the municipal authorities issue a writ of prohibition to the district court to prevent the enforcement of the injunction. 3. SAME. Where a party applied for and obtained from the district court a writ of injunction restraining the municipal authorities from enforcing a city ordinance against him on the ground that the ordinance did not apply to him, and the municipal authorities appealed to the court of appeals the supreme court will not interfere with the jurisdiction of the court of appeals by issuing a writ of prohibition to the district court to prevent the enforcement of the injunction. Original Proceedings. Applications for Writs of Prohibition. Mr. H. M. ORAHOOD, Mr. N. B. BACHTELL and Mr. H. L. RITTER for relators. Mr. MILTON SMITH for respondents. Per Curiam.-These proceedings are the outgrowth of two actions commenced in the district court of Arapahoe county to prevent the police authorities of the city of Denver from enforcing certain ordinances. The judgments being adverse to the petitioners, they ask for writs of prohibition from this court commanding the respondents to desist from further proceedings, or enforcing such judgments. From the petitions filed and other sources of information of which we take judicial notice, the material facts to consider are briefly as follows: One Daniel Cronin was arrested for a violation of the wine room ordinance and fined before the police magistrate of the city of Denver. From this judgment he appealed to the county court of Arapahoe county, where he was again found guilty, and that from this judgment he has brought the case to this court for review on error; that pending his appeal to the county court he instituted proceedings in the district court |