The Failure of the Founding Fathers: Jefferson, Marshall, and the Rise of Presidential DemocracyHarvard University Press, 30 Jun 2009 - 400 halaman Based on seven years of archival research, the book describes previously unknown aspects of the electoral college crisis of 1800, presenting a revised understanding of the early days of two great institutions that continue to have a major impact on American history: the plebiscitarian presidency and a Supreme Court that struggles to put the presidency's claims of a popular mandate into constitutional perspective. Through close studies of two Supreme Court cases, Ackerman shows how the court integrated Federalist and Republican themes into the living Constitution of the early republic. |
Dari dalam buku
Hasil 1-5 dari 86
Halaman 8
... judicial power , it was part of a large strategic retreat , rationalizing a stunning judicial con- cession to the Republicans ' proud claim to a mandate from the People . To glimpse the bigger picture , consider William Marbury's very ...
... judicial power , it was part of a large strategic retreat , rationalizing a stunning judicial con- cession to the Republicans ' proud claim to a mandate from the People . To glimpse the bigger picture , consider William Marbury's very ...
Halaman 9
... judicial independence. On this crucial matter, it was the presidentialist revolution of 1800, not the Founding of 1787, that served as the basis for future constitutional development. If we look at what the Marshall Court did, and not ...
... judicial independence. On this crucial matter, it was the presidentialist revolution of 1800, not the Founding of 1787, that served as the basis for future constitutional development. If we look at what the Marshall Court did, and not ...
Halaman 10
... judicial independence would survive and perhaps the justices might make good on Marbury's claim to power at some remote moment in the future. Act V: Judicial Synthesis. Marshall did not live to see the day when the Court would follow up ...
... judicial independence would survive and perhaps the justices might make good on Marbury's claim to power at some remote moment in the future. Act V: Judicial Synthesis. Marshall did not live to see the day when the Court would follow up ...
Halaman 49
Anda telah mencapai batas penampilan buku ini.
Anda telah mencapai batas penampilan buku ini.
Halaman 76
Anda telah mencapai batas penampilan buku ini.
Anda telah mencapai batas penampilan buku ini.
Edisi yang lain - Lihat semua
The Failure of the Founding Fathers: Jefferson, Marshall, and the Rise of ... Bruce Ackerman Pratinjau terbatas - 2005 |
The Failure of the Founding Fathers: Jefferson, Marshall, and the Rise of ... Bruce Ackerman Tampilan cuplikan - 2005 |
The Failure of the Founding Fathers: Jefferson, Marshall, and the Rise of ... Bruce ACKERMAN Pratinjau tidak tersedia - 2007 |
Istilah dan frasa umum
Aaron Burr Adams’s amendment American Annals appointment authority ballot Bayard Bruce Ackerman campaign candidate Chase chief justice choice circuit court circuit judges circuit riding claim commission Congress congressional consider constitutional Convention count created crisis decision declared district judge effort election of 1800 electoral college electoral votes executive faction February federal Founders Gallatin Georgia Hamilton History Horatius House runoff impeachment interim president James Jeffer Jefferson and Burr Jeffersonian John Adams John Marshall judicial powers judiciary act jurisdiction lame-duck legislative legislature letter Madison majority mandate Marbury Marbury’s March Marshall Court Marshall's ment midnight judges nomination opinion Papers partisan party Paterson Philadelphia Philadelphia Convention Pinckney plebiscitarian political popular presidential principles question Randolph refused repeal Republicans revolution of 1800 Samuel Chase Senate Senate president session statute story Stuart Supreme Court Thomas Jefferson tion tional trial unconstitutional United vice president victory Washington Federalist