The Constitution in ConflictBelknap Press, 1992 - 462 halaman Lincoln was not alone in believing that the Constitution could be interpreted by any of the three branches of the government. Today, however, the Supreme Court's role as the ultimate arbiter of constitutional matters is widely accepted. But as Robert Burt shows in his provocative new book, this was not always the case, nor should it be. In a remarkably innovative reconstruction of constitutional history, Burt traces the controversy over judicial supremacy back to the founding fathers, with Madison and Hamilton as the principal antagonists. The conflicting views these founders espoused--equal interpretive powers among the federal branches on one hand and judicial supremacy on the other--remain plausible readings of "original intent" and so continue to present us with a choice. Drawing extensively on Lincoln's conception of political equality, Burt argues convincingly that judicial supremacy and majority rule are both inconsistent with the egalitarian democratic ideal. The proper task of the judiciary, he contends--as epitomized in Brown v. Board of Education--is to actively protect minorities against "enslaving" legislative defeats while, at the same time, to refrain from awarding conclusive "victory" to these minorities against their adversaries. From this premise, Burt goes on to examine key decisions such as Roe v. Wade, U.S. v. Nixon, and the death penalty cases, all of which demonstrate how the Court has fallen away from egalitarian jurisprudence and returned to an essentially authoritarian conception of its role. With an eye to the urgent issues at stake in these cases, Burt identifies the alternative results that an egalitarian conception of judicial authority would dictate. Thefirst fully articulated presentation of the Constitution as a communally interpreted document in which the Supreme Court plays an important, but not predominant, role, The Constitution in Conflict has dramatic implications for both the theory and the practice of constitutional law. |
Dari dalam buku
Hasil 1-3 dari 11
Halaman 57
... treaty and that subsequent violative enactments would be judicially respected notwithstanding that they were treaty violations , which clearly implies that he was referring to laws enacted by the states as parties to the treaty rather ...
... treaty and that subsequent violative enactments would be judicially respected notwithstanding that they were treaty violations , which clearly implies that he was referring to laws enacted by the states as parties to the treaty rather ...
Halaman 159
... treaty arrangements but was defended by Jacksonians on the ground that , as a result of the state jurisdictional claims , the federal government could best pro- tect the tribes by expediting their removal.18 Jackson himself told the ...
... treaty arrangements but was defended by Jacksonians on the ground that , as a result of the state jurisdictional claims , the federal government could best pro- tect the tribes by expediting their removal.18 Jackson himself told the ...
Halaman 160
Robert A. Burt. have helped to vindicate federal treaty obligations . But Jackson's objection was not made on ... treaties with Indian tribes as if they were sovereign nations . As military commander , he repeatedly advocated unilateral ...
Robert A. Burt. have helped to vindicate federal treaty obligations . But Jackson's objection was not made on ... treaties with Indian tribes as if they were sovereign nations . As military commander , he repeatedly advocated unilateral ...
Isi
White Bosses | 1 |
The Constitutional Question | 9 |
Madisons Institutional Answer | 34 |
Hak Cipta | |
11 bagian lainnya tidak diperlihatkan
Edisi yang lain - Lihat semua
Istilah dan frasa umum
abortion acknowledged action Amendment American appeared authority basis blacks branches Brown Civil claim clearly conception concern conclusion conflict Congress congressional constitutional Convention course criticism death penalty decision direct directly effect election enacted enforcement equality existence federal Federalist follow force founders fundamental ground Hamilton House ideal identified immediate imposed Indians institutional interpretation invalidating issue Jackson Jefferson John judges judicial judicial authority judiciary Justices least legislative legislature letter Lincoln Madison majority Marshall Marshall's master means ment moral moreover mutual North observed opinion original party political possibility practical premise President Press principle protect question race racial reason regarding relations remained Republican resolution resolve response role rule segregation Senate slave slavery social society South southern specific statute subjugative supremacy Supreme Court tion ultimate Union United Univ Virginia vote whites York